theCapraAegagrus

You want me to "show you" that I was wrong?* Why? Is your problem with people admitting they're wrong or people "proving they admitted they were wrong". They're kinda one and the same, kav. *When I can't even recall the exact topic, nonetheless. LOL.

Just recently there was a thread where I said, "I don't think anyone likes __________." Someone proved me wrong by claiming that they liked that thing. I can't remember the topic, or what it was, but I was wrong. I've been wrong about bigger subjects than that. Probably closer to when I was newer to posting.

I've read this dozens of times. Please move on from it. If you're using 1 other person's interaction with you to dictate how you have a conversation with me, does that sound fair to you...? Are you satisfied with being a hypocrite? Honest question - not trying to attack you. Because you wouldn't admit to being wrong during the previous interaction on this thread - when you objectively were. FTR: I have been wrong, and will be wrong. I've been wrong on these boards and admitted it. So that should have no bearing on how you approach me.

Progress: 26/1,000 I ended up reading nothing in January, but made some strides today. Hellboy: The Crooked Man #1 Jimmy Olsen #142 Suoerman Vol. 3 #32 Batman '66 #1 Batman (Rebirth) #1 Star Wars (2015) #1 Nothing of note to say regarding the above. Batman: Black & White #2 (22 mini-issues) The artwork is 50/50 good and lackluster. Nothing memorable outside of Ross' (and a few others') illustrations and a "POOP POOP POOP" sound effect...

And now the toxicity is seething into other threads. That's mature. I mean, I think he's an 'okay' guy, but the hypocrisy is flashing warning signs.

Never heard this before. @The Lions Den

I suggest L2R. "After clean and press." I suggest getting over yourselves. Jeez. The toxicity is seething.

I guess, since you can't harass via reactions anymore without potential report, you're just going to spam nonsense? Nonsensical and rule-violating, amirite? I really thought that you were better than this.

I didn't know it was possible to be so wrong, but dammit, you did it kav. You're simply wrong. Can't you just man-up to it? I lack beliefs. This is a fact. You can accept it, gracefully, and move on - or stew in a soup of misinformation and self-disillusioned perception that you're conveying right now. Your choice.

I get that you think you're some abstract literary genius, but, you're not. Spamming misconceptions about the word belief and its definition doesn't make any sense, artistically, or literally.

Incorrect. Facts are not beliefs. They are, again, 2 different words for a reason.

Incorrect. English language (the only factual authority in this distinction) dictates this.

You're 100% incorrect, kav. You can't gaslight me.

Thought is, factually, not equal to belief. They're different words for a reason.

Inference ≠ belief.

Again incorrect. Your belief that those without beliefs are below you is unbecoming IMO. I suggest opening your mind. Lacking beliefs is not a belief.

Incorrect, kav. Aside from the fact that the belief would actually be that a human or being is more valuable than one another, thought ≠ belief.

5.0-range IMO. I would think a clean/press pushes it 6.0+.

If I'm going to have a discussion with a brick wall, I may as well entertain myself. The brick wall ain't funny or informative. Try staying on-topic plz.

This is not a sentence.

It's just Stu. The username wasn't a dead-giveaway this time.

It's just an "informational"/"training" type of meeting. If I get a pop quiz, though, I'm screwed! I'm still giving this comic book a 2.5.

I can't bring myself to consider Spider-Man 3 on the "bad" side of comic book movies. Last time I re-watched it (within the past couple of years) I thoroughly enjoyed the first 90 minutes. The back-half is a let down, for sure, but I feel it's overall "good". Topher Grace was not a good fit for Venom. I agree that Sandman was very good.

That's ironic.

Try to stay on-topic. Posting drek isn't helping.