• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

androolx

Member
  • Posts

    225
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by androolx

  1. 2 hours ago, Saint_Doyle said:

    I need to update my original post concerning the Marvel Star Thundercats reprints. Originally I had claimed there existed a very rare 3rd print of Thundercats #2.  Fellow boardie androolx located a second copy of the elusive "Third Print Thundercats #2."  After a bit of investigation we now believe this to be an ERROR printing of the 1st print, as opposed to a 3rd print.  Here is the evidence:

    • All ads (including the back cover, interior covers, subscription offer, and Marvel checklist) are all the identical and on the same page as in the 1st print DM/US Newsstand/CAN Newsstand editions.
    • This issue was dated Feb. 1986.  Regular Marvel titles had increased in cover price to the 75¢ / 50p / 95¢ shown on this printing in this month, however Marvel Star titles (including Thundercats) would remain at the previous Marvel pricing structure of 65¢ / 30p / 75¢ in Feb. '86 until changing along with the rest of Marvel the following month in Mar. '86.  
    • The 75¢ / 50p / 95¢ Thundercats #2 does not state that it is a reprint in the Indica.  This is not concrete proof of anything, as this was commonly omitted in reprints of this era, but is still worth a mention.

    These facts lead us to believe that this 75¢ / 50p / 95¢ Thundercats #2 is not a 3rd Printing as previously believed, but is instead an ERROR printing of the 1st Print Direct Market edition.  Androolx proposed a situation where the person assembling the cover for print forgot to use old price box and accidentally printed a few copies with the new price box before catching the error and correcting it for the rest of the run.  This is complete speculation, but seems plausible.   

    Do you see any reason to believe this 75¢ / 50p / 95¢ Thundercats #2 is actually a 3rd Print?  I feel confident it is an ERROR 1st printing, given the evidence.  Anything else I should look for?  

    This seems like an error printing similar to the Captain America #212 35¢ "no Marvel Comics Group banner" error printing, or the Marvel Spotlight #1 "no issue number" error printing, as opposed to the more common error printings where one color of ink was low for a fraction of the run.

     

    Thundercats 2 editions and prints.jpg

    One thing I would add is that the 75c/50p/95c pricing of the book at issue and of standard 02/1986 Marvel titles was unique to that month.  In 03/1986, the pricing of standard Marvel titles changed to 75c/40p/95c.  It is unlikely that Marvel would reprint a book with a pricing scheme that Marvel had stopped using.

  2. 4 hours ago, Garystar said:

    I don’t think this is right? My copies you can’t get the tattooz without ripping the paper wallet. 
    ECE8E13D-93AB-46F9-8265-3E8455603682.thumb.jpeg.ac5f223c98c63663042851dd9316cad8.jpeg

    2C5BBB7A-A10F-41FF-BE54-1BD8166FDAC0.thumb.jpeg.60a5a4a2b0e014b6ebbd9557435461b5.jpeg

    I don't want to deviate too much from the OP's original topic, but you did point out an incorrect generalization in my first post.  Thanks for doing that. I should have said the Tattooz insert opening is accessible on most of the inserts; some of the inserts were stapled in such a way that the opening is not accessible.

    I just checked 28 books with Tattooz inserts (none of which are ASM 238) and the insert opening is accessible on 26 of them.  I have found a couple books with the insert where the enclosed tattoo is partially outside the insert (see photo).

    20201107_075252.jpg

  3. The Tattooz insert was an unsealed envelope containing usually one tattoo; tattoos can be removed from or inserted into the insert without altering the insert.  Thus, there is no way to know whether a tattoo in any given Tattooz insert is original to that insert.  With that being the case, if a Tattooz insert is torn but a tattoo is present, could it not be considered as being the same as a torn page and get a Universal label?

  4. Based on my own dealings with the USPS regarding lost mail, I suggest you go to your local post office in person and interact with the postmaster or a supervisor regarding the lost package.  You should also request that a trace be put the package and that a lost item case be opened.  The USPS often has additional information regarding the scanning of a package than what appears in the tracking history available to you on the internet.

  5. A few of the more noteworthy 1st full appearances in Marvel 35 cent price variants are:

    Jocasta (Avengers #162)

    KISS (Howard The Duck #13)

    Machine Man (2001 #8)

    Rocket Racer (ASM #172)

    Starjammers (X-Men #107)

    Honorable Mentions

    1st Godzilla in comic book (Godzilla #1)

    1st Jack Of Hearts in color comic book (Incredible Hulk #214)

    1st Thanos solo story (Logan's Run # 6)

    1st White Tiger in a color comic book (Spetacular Spider-Man #9)

     

     

  6. Hi.  I would appreciate the collective wisdom of the boardies on grading this.  I believe the pics document all the defects, including:  Small tear FC top edge (which I believe occurred during the shipping of the book - grrr); large color-breaking bends/creases FC LLH corner and FC LRH corner; damage/tears to upper outside corner; obvious tanning; several large non-color-breaking bends FC (the long horizontal bend across the FC about 1/3 of the way down appears in some of the pics to break color, but it does not); some color-breaking spine stress.  Thank you

    HOS 92 300.jpg

    HOS 92b 300.jpg

    20200222_200834.jpg

    20200222_204454.jpg

    20200629_195439.jpg

    20200629_195457.jpg

    20200629_195504.jpg

    20200629_195508.jpg

    20200629_195540.jpg

    20200629_195627.jpg

    20200629_195739.jpg

  7. The Tattooz insert is an unsealed envelope which is supposed to contain a Tattooz (temporary tattoo).  The insert is usually inserted between the cover and first wrap so that the insert wraps around the spine and is stapled by the top staple.  The opening of the insert is usually accessible between the last page and the back cover (I say "usually" because I have a book where the insert is wrapped so that the opening of the insert is between the front cover and first page, making the contents of the insert inaccessible).  Therefore, in most cases where an insert is Tattooz-less, it is impossible to say whether the insert was produced without a Tattooz or the Tattooz was removed.  The attached photo is of a Tattooz insert which was never attached to a book, and shows the opening of the insert.

    20200414_204326.jpg