• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

KCOComics

Member
  • Posts

    4,766
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by KCOComics

  1. On 1/9/2024 at 7:38 PM, MultiSig Mike said:

    Apologies @zzutak not my area of expertise. Back to basics...you have 2 identical issues, one with a blue label and one with a purple label. What is the % difference if buying (or selling) either one? If there is no simple and direct answer then that is fine too.

    There is no direct answer because different Restoration is viewed differently. Also the Era of the book and rarity of the book matters. Lots of variables. 

    For example slight Color Touch generally is viewed more favorably than trimming. 

    Extensive resto would be worth far less than Apparant. 

    If you a modern restored book,  you might get $.10 on the dollar is your lucky. But if it's an apparant GA book with 15 on the census, it may get 75% a blue label. 

    If you have a specific example, it may be helpful. 

     

     

  2. On 1/9/2024 at 5:45 PM, RCheli said:

    I got this note from Sean's wife to share with the group:

    Thank you to everyone on the CGC boards who wrote such kind and eloquent posts about Sean. They were incredibly meaningful to me, our daughters, and the rest of our family. He really loved talking with all of you over the years, but I don’t think he would’ve expected this kind of outpouring.

    For those of you who really dug his Rick Geary Frank Zappa avatar, I thought you might like to see where we have the original hanging in our home. It’s on the wall next to an oversized Zappa poster that Sean bought at Cheap Thrills record store in New Brunswick NJ when he was a student at Rutgers c. 1988. I had it restored for him about 15 years after he bought it, and it’s been hanging on our wall since then. We were both psyched to have the 2012 Geary pen and ink accompany it.

    -Bonnie Wasielewski


     

    IMG_1618.jpg

    Please thank Bonnie for sharing this update. On an anonymous chat board,  it's nice to get a glimpse into people's lives! 

  3. On 1/9/2024 at 9:42 AM, comicsbuysell said:

    I'm curious on everyone's opinion about pressing an already high grade modern that I will send in to be slabbed. Does this help raise the likely-hood of receiving that 9.8? Thanks!

    You can post pictures in the spare a grade section here and folks will offer their opinions on pressing. 

     

    That Joey guy who just responded knows a thing or two about pressing. 

  4. On 1/9/2024 at 10:08 AM, nochips said:

    House of Secrets # 9 Good $ 10.00

    30085.jpg

    30085a.jpg

     

    On 1/9/2024 at 10:08 AM, nochips said:

    House of Secrets # 22 Good $ 10.00

    30086.jpg

    30086a.jpg

     

    On 1/9/2024 at 10:16 AM, nochips said:

    Man O' Mars # 1 Fair $ 15.00

    30103.jpg

    30103a.jpg

     

    On 1/9/2024 at 10:15 AM, nochips said:

    Journey into Unknown Worlds $ 59 Good $ 10.00

    30075.jpg

    30075a.jpg

     

    On 1/9/2024 at 10:09 AM, nochips said:

    House of Secrets #23 G/VG $ 12.00

    30087.jpg

    30087a.jpg

     

    Take

  5. On 1/7/2024 at 6:51 AM, Dr. Balls said:

    Dang, I missed all the action yesterday. Including more protestations of "the book was returned exactly like I sent it!" lol 

    I will share an unpopular opinion: there is not nearly enough public shaming going on in the world. I don't mind the dog piling. It serves a very social purpose that has gotten lost in modern societies way of thinking: if you're an assclown, and a great many people point it out - you have two choices: change your assclowney ways, or go somewhere else that may allow you to continue to be an assclown.

    This guy got dogpiled for being an utter turd of a seller, and he has now left the building. Worth it.

    I agree with @ThothAmon - we don't need anymore rules. However, maybe a slight modification to the General Rules on Returns would be helpful. Such as 'Return shipping on a damaged package paid by the Seller' or something like that. As others have pointed out, regardless of how good or bad you pack something, if the shipping company damages it, the Seller is still responsible to land it in the condition it was purchased in.

    It's a small thing, but I do read seller's return policies. And while this dingbat said "No Returns", I did not expect resistance upon receiving a damaged package. I don't know, nor care what this guy's problem was. I had a cool, inexpensive Sabrina 1, and he jacked it up by packing it poorly. 

    I don't know what else to cover, I consider all of this closed and am glad this dink has deleted his account and left. 

     

    I am big on personal accountability.  It's the biggest thing I work on with my kids. When you screw up,  don't deny it,  don't run away,  own it and fix it. 

    I see that lack of personal accountability everywhere! Work, society.  

    And I agree - he should have taken responsibility for this. He screwed up. He should have owned it. It was $5. He overreacted over a nothing issue. 

    But I still stand by my statement.  People should weigh in on the situation - who is right and defining how to make it right - I see that as helpful. It's when the comments turn towards getting demeaning that they become counter productive.  When you back people into a corner,  your less likely to get your desired outcome. 

  6. On 1/6/2024 at 2:59 PM, Get Marwood & I said:

    Some of the pile on posts that prompted me to post this morning appear to have been removed. There's one, at least, that I can recall. That makes it look like I'm over reacting and siding with the guy who couldn't pack, and who took it badly when it was politely pointed out to him. I'm not. My advice was that people should own their mistakes. Separate to that, I said I didn't like pile ons. That comment took into account the nature of the removed post(s) and where the dialogue was heading.

    I don't disagree with your sentiment. 

    Piling on can be counter productive and put  people on defense. Instead of "learning a lesson" - they say screw it, let's burn it down. 

    And look,  the self policing around here has done a pretty effective job at protecting a fee free selling venue for decades... so I'm not even telling anyone to change their ways. 

    I just think piling on over simple disagreements can be counter productive. 

    Piling on when it's out right fraud and deception - game on! 

  7. This resolution seems like an over reaction to a small situation. 

    On 1/6/2024 at 10:56 AM, ThothAmon said:

    I bought three books from this seller in an earlier sales thread for close to a grand. The packaging was Shiite and the books were “oversold” in my opinion. Worth half what I paid. As far as his treatment here?  His behavior is what led whatever stick he’s gotten. 
     

    As someone who buys here a lot no new rules please. No need for one unless it bans packing peanuts and excessive tape. 
     

     

    This post is actually more concerning to me. Overgrading and under packing.

  8. On 1/4/2024 at 10:10 PM, Andrew Clarke said:

    Arg - I guess asking how long it will be in storage is like asking how long a piece of string is - thanks for info.

    4 weeks feels like alot right now,  though i haven't personally submitted books in over a year. 

    I would give them a call.  

     

    During covid,  it was typical for books to sit unopened for months and months. The last I read from boardies it was moving relativity fast.