• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

PROBATION DISCUSSIONS
21 21

Started by alwaysbronze,

36,203 posts in this topic

chrisco37

chrisco37

Posted
Posted
Roy, I think it's admirable that you consistently try to be the moral conscience of the board, but unfortunately all too often you conveniently overlook the facts or even worse you don't understand the facts at all.

 

Recently in another thread, completely out of the blue, you inexplicably came to the defense of the most moderated member of this board and it was very clear that you had no clue in regards to the totality of the circumstances.

 

Hence the backlash you often receive - such unreasonable altruism is destined to generate negative comments from those you annoy by repeatedly injecting yourself into these types of situations.

 

This isn't a witch-hunt against Chip, it's a collective expression of frustration combined with a desire to finally gain some measure of justice.

 

Nailed it. 100% nailed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Logan510

Logan510

Posted
Posted
What a scatamonious load of tripe.

 

Context? ???

See who I replayed to.
Casey is slow

 

He says the same about you

 

Would you defend me? :baiting:

 

No but I'll carry your books home from school

 

(tsk)

 

ride_zpskuajf98p.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
topofthetotem

topofthetotem

Posted
Posted
Roy, I think it's admirable that you consistently try to be the moral conscience of the board, but unfortunately all too often you conveniently overlook the facts or even worse you don't understand the facts at all.

 

Recently in another thread, completely out of the blue, you inexplicably came to the defense of the most moderated member of this board and it was very clear that you had no clue in regards to the totality of the circumstances.

 

Hence the backlash you often receive - such unreasonable altruism is destined to generate negative comments from those you annoy by repeatedly injecting yourself into these types of situations.

 

This isn't a witch-hunt against Chip, it's a collective expression of frustration combined with a desire to finally gain some measure of justice.

 

Nailed it. 100% nailed it.

But is that "patient and reasonable" enough for Roy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jsilverjanet

jsilverjanet

Posted
Posted
What a scatamonious load of tripe.

 

Context? ???

See who I replayed to.
Casey is slow

 

He says the same about you

 

Would you defend me? :baiting:

 

No but I'll carry your books home from school

 

(tsk)

 

ride_zpskuajf98p.gif

 

I've been drinking milk and stopped smoking cigarettes

 

I'm sure I've grown an inch or two since you last saw me

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chrisco37

chrisco37

Posted
Posted
Roy, I think it's admirable that you consistently try to be the moral conscience of the board, but unfortunately all too often you conveniently overlook the facts or even worse you don't understand the facts at all.

 

Recently in another thread, completely out of the blue, you inexplicably came to the defense of the most moderated member of this board and it was very clear that you had no clue in regards to the totality of the circumstances.

 

Hence the backlash you often receive - such unreasonable altruism is destined to generate negative comments from those you annoy by repeatedly injecting yourself into these types of situations.

 

This isn't a witch-hunt against Chip, it's a collective expression of frustration combined with a desire to finally gain some measure of justice.

 

Nailed it. 100% nailed it.

But is that "patient and reasonable" enough for Roy?

 

I thought that comment was a load of BS. I'm not one to make snap decisions (at least, I don't think I am). I try to see both sides of a situation before I come to my conclusion. I had seen more than enough over the years regarding Chip. I'm not a big fan of the "whoa is me" act.

 

As I said to someone else in a PM, no less, there always was some issue, always some problem, always drama. But one common denominator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
topofthetotem

topofthetotem

Posted
Posted
Roy, I think it's admirable that you consistently try to be the moral conscience of the board, but unfortunately all too often you conveniently overlook the facts or even worse you don't understand the facts at all.

 

Recently in another thread, completely out of the blue, you inexplicably came to the defense of the most moderated member of this board and it was very clear that you had no clue in regards to the totality of the circumstances.

 

Hence the backlash you often receive - such unreasonable altruism is destined to generate negative comments from those you annoy by repeatedly injecting yourself into these types of situations.

 

This isn't a witch-hunt against Chip, it's a collective expression of frustration combined with a desire to finally gain some measure of justice.

 

Nailed it. 100% nailed it.

But is that "patient and reasonable" enough for Roy?

 

I thought that comment was a load of BS. I'm not one to make snap decisions (at least, I don't think I am). I try to see both sides of a situation before I come to my conclusion. I had seen more than enough over the years regarding Chip. I'm not a big fan of the "whoa is me" act.

 

As I said to someone else in a PM, no less, there always was some issue, always some problem, always drama. But one common denominator.

This has been a long discussion and I might be wrong but wasn't the mental health issue brought up by on of the "excusers" and not one of the "accusers"?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
greggy

greggy

Posted
Posted
Roy, I think it's admirable that you consistently try to be the moral conscience of the board, but unfortunately all too often you conveniently overlook the facts or even worse you don't understand the facts at all.

 

Recently in another thread, completely out of the blue, you inexplicably came to the defense of the most moderated member of this board and it was very clear that you had no clue in regards to the totality of the circumstances.

 

Hence the backlash you often receive - such unreasonable altruism is destined to generate negative comments from those you annoy by repeatedly injecting yourself into these types of situations.

 

This isn't a witch-hunt against Chip, it's a collective expression of frustration combined with a desire to finally gain some measure of justice.

 

Nailed it. 100% nailed it.

But is that "patient and reasonable" enough for Roy?

 

I thought that comment was a load of BS. I'm not one to make snap decisions (at least, I don't think I am). I try to see both sides of a situation before I come to my conclusion. I had seen more than enough over the years regarding Chip. I'm not a big fan of the "whoa is me" act.

 

As I said to someone else in a PM, no less, there always was some issue, always some problem, always drama. But one common denominator.

Roy?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Logan510

Logan510

Posted
Posted
Roy, I think it's admirable that you consistently try to be the moral conscience of the board, but unfortunately all too often you conveniently overlook the facts or even worse you don't understand the facts at all.

 

Recently in another thread, completely out of the blue, you inexplicably came to the defense of the most moderated member of this board and it was very clear that you had no clue in regards to the totality of the circumstances.

 

Hence the backlash you often receive - such unreasonable altruism is destined to generate negative comments from those you annoy by repeatedly injecting yourself into these types of situations.

 

This isn't a witch-hunt against Chip, it's a collective expression of frustration combined with a desire to finally gain some measure of justice.

 

Nailed it. 100% nailed it.

But is that "patient and reasonable" enough for Roy?

 

I thought that comment was a load of BS. I'm not one to make snap decisions (at least, I don't think I am). I try to see both sides of a situation before I come to my conclusion. I had seen more than enough over the years regarding Chip. I'm not a big fan of the "whoa is me" act.

 

As I said to someone else in a PM, no less, there always was some issue, always some problem, always drama. But one common denominator.

This has been a long discussion and I might be wrong but wasn't the mental health issue brought up by on of the "excusers" and not one of the "accusers"?

 

You're not wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shark

Shark

Posted
Posted
Roy, I think it's admirable that you consistently try to be the moral conscience of the board, but unfortunately all too often you conveniently overlook the facts or even worse you don't understand the facts at all.

 

Recently in another thread, completely out of the blue, you inexplicably came to the defense of the most moderated member of this board and it was very clear that you had no clue in regards to the totality of the circumstances.

 

Hence the backlash you often receive - such unreasonable altruism is destined to generate negative comments from those you annoy by repeatedly injecting yourself into these types of situations.

 

This isn't a witch-hunt against Chip, it's a collective expression of frustration combined with a desire to finally gain some measure of justice.

 

Nailed it. 100% nailed it.

But is that "patient and reasonable" enough for Roy?

 

I thought that comment was a load of BS. I'm not one to make snap decisions (at least, I don't think I am). I try to see both sides of a situation before I come to my conclusion. I had seen more than enough over the years regarding Chip. I'm not a big fan of the "whoa is me" act.

 

As I said to someone else in a PM, no less, there always was some issue, always some problem, always drama. But one common denominator.

 

Voted.

 

If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck....or a Chip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chrisco37

chrisco37

Posted
Posted
Roy, I think it's admirable that you consistently try to be the moral conscience of the board, but unfortunately all too often you conveniently overlook the facts or even worse you don't understand the facts at all.

 

Recently in another thread, completely out of the blue, you inexplicably came to the defense of the most moderated member of this board and it was very clear that you had no clue in regards to the totality of the circumstances.

 

Hence the backlash you often receive - such unreasonable altruism is destined to generate negative comments from those you annoy by repeatedly injecting yourself into these types of situations.

 

This isn't a witch-hunt against Chip, it's a collective expression of frustration combined with a desire to finally gain some measure of justice.

 

Nailed it. 100% nailed it.

But is that "patient and reasonable" enough for Roy?

 

I thought that comment was a load of BS. I'm not one to make snap decisions (at least, I don't think I am). I try to see both sides of a situation before I come to my conclusion. I had seen more than enough over the years regarding Chip. I'm not a big fan of the "whoa is me" act.

 

As I said to someone else in a PM, no less, there always was some issue, always some problem, always drama. But one common denominator.

Roy?

 

lol

 

meh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
21 21
Go to topic listing