• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

New Poster ?-pencil and ink marks on cover

30 posts in this topic

Hi everyone, I'm totally new to posting, but have been reading these boards avidly for awhile now. Question, how do people feel about pencil or ink marks on covers of golden age books? Do they cut into the desirability of an otherwise high-grading book? Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, I'm totally new to posting, but have been reading these boards avidly for awhile now. Question, how do people feel about pencil or ink marks on covers of golden age books? Do they cut into the desirability of an otherwise high-grading book? Thanks!

 

It depends. I can only speak to my own personal preference/tastes here, but pencil marks are usually less of an issue than ink. Also, arrival date notation, in the form of an unobtrusive pencil/pen mark or store stamp can actually be desirable to pin-point the history of a particular book (in some cases providing a verifiable pedigree), but scribbled owners names and filled in coupons don't hold much appeal for me (even on pedigreed books).

 

Of course, everyone's mileage varies and a lot depends on the rarity and condition of the book or books in question. (shrug)

 

Hope that helps, and BTW, ...WTTB! (thumbs u

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, I'm totally new to posting, but have been reading these boards avidly for awhile now. Question, how do people feel about pencil or ink marks on covers of golden age books? Do they cut into the desirability of an otherwise high-grading book? Thanks!

 

Many of the very best copies of GA books come from pedigree collections that are identified by their distributor or owner markings. As such there is considerable tolerance for them and many collectors actually prefer copies with these types of markings. Not all markings are desirable such those that are considered defacing and other examples cited in other posts in this thread.

 

Welcome to the Boards! :hi:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, I'm totally new to posting, but have been reading these boards avidly for awhile now. Question, how do people feel about pencil or ink marks on covers of golden age books? Do they cut into the desirability of an otherwise high-grading book? Thanks!

 

It depends. I can only speak to my own personal preference/tastes here, but pencil marks are usually less of an issue than ink. Also, arrival date notation, in the form of an unobtrusive pencil/pen mark or store stamp can actually be desirable to pin-point the history of a particular book (in some cases providing a verifiable pedigree), but scribbled owners names and filled in coupons don't hold much appeal for me (even on pedigreed books).

 

Of course, everyone's mileage varies and a lot depends on the rarity and condition of the book or books in question. (shrug)

 

Hope that helps, and BTW, ...WTTB! (thumbs u

 

time for one of our non-scientific and largely b.s. polls. on the following back cover of an early jo-jo, in VF shape, vote "yes" if you'd prefer it WITH the writing, or "no" if you'd prefer it blank.

 

i'll start: YES. 1-0 in favor of "yes" currently

 

jojocoupon.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a tough call, but it stands at 2-1. hm

 

Given similar condition I'd still prefer collecting the book without the original owner's signature scribbled on it (front, back and/or interior), pedigree notwithstanding.

 

That said, from a dealer's or investor's standpoint I can certainly understand why the Recil Macon pedigree is prized, but I'm more motivated to collect based upon the apparent condition of books. The closer a comic is to it's newsstand appearance the better I like it.

 

So, I'll stand by my earlier comments. From a purely subjective POV, some pedigree markings are more desirable than others. :sorry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a tough call, but it stands at 2-1. hm

 

Given similar condition I'd still prefer collecting the book without the original owner's signature scribbled on it (front, back and/or interior), pedigree notwithstanding.

 

That said, from a dealer's or investor's standpoint I can certainly understand why the Recil Macon pedigree is prized, but I'm more motivated to collect based upon the apparent condition of books. The closer a comic is to it's newsstand appearance the better I like it.

 

So, I'll stand by my earlier comments. From a purely subjective POV, some pedigree markings are more desirable than others. :sorry:

 

With Steve's vote, I'll agree and make it 4-1. (thumbs u

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(thumbs u I don't mind being in the minority, ...that just means four collectors are competing for the same book while I buy an orphaned non-pedigree VF book. :whistle:

 

we see your books; your "minority" position is looking pretty damn good!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like my books to have a little character. I'd rather have the copy of Batman #15 that

Doiby Dickles posted in the War Bond thread than a straight-up 4.0 copy (the one with

"Don Zabel" and "Baton Rouge" stamped all over the cover). It's not a pedigree, but it

makes it a little bit more interesting to me. I have a beat-up copy of Doll Man #21 with

"Len Wein" stamped all over it that I see no reason to upgrade for the same reason.

 

So I'd vote yes, but my vote should be thrown out 'cause I've never been accused of

being a high-grade collector (getting back to the original poster's question).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take it, too. I don't have one of Recil's books yet. I do have one of Eldon's.

 

i wonder if there's an eldon with a coupon filled out? i'd love to have one.

 

6-1 [without my ballot stuffing].

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a tough call, but it stands at 2-1. hm

 

Given similar condition I'd still prefer collecting the book without the original owner's signature scribbled on it (front, back and/or interior), pedigree notwithstanding.

 

That said, from a dealer's or investor's standpoint I can certainly understand why the Recil Macon pedigree is prized, but I'm more motivated to collect based upon the apparent condition of books. The closer a comic is to it's newsstand appearance the better I like it.

 

So, I'll stand by my earlier comments. From a purely subjective POV, some pedigree markings are more desirable than others. :sorry:

 

I don't mind distrbutor codes or arrival dates if not too distracting. The White Mountain date is OK......names on the front I don't care for, inside is OK. I suppose that makes it 6.5-1.5 lol GOD BLESS....

 

-jimbo(a friend of jesus) (thumbs u

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a tough call, but it stands at 2-1. hm

 

Given similar condition I'd still prefer collecting the book without the original owner's signature scribbled on it (front, back and/or interior), pedigree notwithstanding.

 

That said, from a dealer's or investor's standpoint I can certainly understand why the Recil Macon pedigree is prized, but I'm more motivated to collect based upon the apparent condition of books. The closer a comic is to it's newsstand appearance the better I like it.

 

So, I'll stand by my earlier comments. From a purely subjective POV, some pedigree markings are more desirable than others. :sorry:

 

I don't mind distrbutor codes or arrival dates if not too distracting. The White Mountain date is OK......names on the front I don't care for, inside is OK. I suppose that makes it 6.5-1.5 lol GOD BLESS....

 

-jimbo(a friend of jesus) (thumbs u

 

did you vote for barack mccain?

Link to comment
Share on other sites