When you receive a different CGC book than was pictured

[N/A]

Take a nap and miss the fun.

 

For the "shady" comment I offer no hassle returns. Nothing shady when a buyer is completely covered long before eBay had their returns policy.

 

"posse" - Using this as a way of dismissing other opinions is just silly. It falls into the same logic as someone talking negative about a title must not have any or someone talking positive must be sitting on 100 copies.

 

Disclosure - I am usually a big fan of this but at the same time it is too open to interpretation. Some buyers seem to think there is a big difference between the book they're getting and the picture when I state this. I suppose if I received sufficient feedback I may revisit this.

 

Darkstar - you will use stock photo for a raw but not a CGC. That seems very silly to me and you only stated it to get a rise. With a raw you have the opportunity to show very detailed scans that you can't with a CGC. A CGC comic has their opinion of the grade and likely your opinion leading to the submission. The raw comic has only your opinion. Strange.

 

 

 

 

I sell almost exclusively brand new moderns. I sell Rachel Rising #1 and some 9.8 copies have a rub on the side which warrants a separate picture. 99% of all other books the multiples are essentially the exact same quality.

[cousin itt]

What's open to interpretation about whether or not you are using a stock photo? Either it's a photo of the item for sale or it isn't. That isn't a matter of opinion.

[N/A]

What's open to interpretation about whether or not you are using a stock photo? Either it's a photo of the item for sale or it isn't. That isn't a matter of opinion.

 

Did you read the post?

[kav]

We need some cuddly, little fun bombs....

[cousin itt]

What's open to interpretation about whether or not you are using a stock photo? Either it's a photo of the item for sale or it isn't. That isn't a matter of opinion.

 

Did you read the post?

 

Yes.

[N/A]

What's open to interpretation about whether or not you are using a stock photo? Either it's a photo of the item for sale or it isn't. That isn't a matter of opinion.

 

Did you read the post?

 

Yes.

 

Then I can't help you.

[N/A]

We need some cuddly, little fun bombs....

 

I get in trouble when I throw those around.

[Darkowl]

Take a nap and miss the fun.

 

For the "shady" comment I offer no hassle returns. Nothing shady when a buyer is completely covered long before eBay had their returns policy.

 

"posse" - Using this as a way of dismissing other opinions is just silly. It falls into the same logic as someone talking negative about a title must not have any or someone talking positive must be sitting on 100 copies.

 

Disclosure - I am usually a big fan of this but at the same time it is too open to interpretation. Some buyers seem to think there is a big difference between the book they're getting and the picture when I state this. I suppose if I received sufficient feedback I may revisit this.

 

Darkstar - you will use stock photo for a raw but not a CGC. That seems very silly to me and you only stated it to get a rise. With a raw you have the opportunity to show very detailed scans that you can't with a CGC. A CGC comic has their opinion of the grade and likely your opinion leading to the submission. The raw comic has only your opinion. Strange.

 

 

 

 

I sell almost exclusively brand new moderns. I sell Rachel Rising #1 and some 9.8 copies have a rub on the side which warrants a separate picture. 99% of all other books the multiples are essentially the exact same quality.

 

If you were to look up, "posse" in the dictionary, It wouldn't say, "a way of dismissing other opinions". I loosely used that word in the correct context.Keep in mind that I even put quotation marks around It to emphasize the slight sarcasm. Perhaps you don't know what the word means?

 

"Disclosure - I am usually a big fan of this but at the same time it is too open to interpretation. Some buyers seem to think there is a big difference between the book they're getting and the picture when I state this. I suppose if I received sufficient feedback I may revisit this."

 

Usually? Why am I not surprised? You've already received negative feedback from good-standing board members just within the last hour or so. You ever stop to wonder why some buyers seem to think there might be a big difference between the book they're getting and the display picture? Apparently some people do need to receive sufficient feedback to reconsider their methods.

 

 

 

[Darkowl]

What's open to interpretation about whether or not you are using a stock photo? Either it's a photo of the item for sale or it isn't. That isn't a matter of opinion.

 

Did you read the post?

 

Yes.

 

Then I can't help you.

 

Is that what you say to your unsatisfied customers?

[youmechooz]

[N/A]

What's open to interpretation about whether or not you are using a stock photo? Either it's a photo of the item for sale or it isn't. That isn't a matter of opinion.

 

Did you read the post?

 

Yes.

 

Then I can't help you.

 

Is that what you say to your unsatisfied customers?

 

Don't have any.

 

The answer to his question is in the same post that prompted his question.

[N/A]

Take a nap and miss the fun.

 

For the "shady" comment I offer no hassle returns. Nothing shady when a buyer is completely covered long before eBay had their returns policy.

 

"posse" - Using this as a way of dismissing other opinions is just silly. It falls into the same logic as someone talking negative about a title must not have any or someone talking positive must be sitting on 100 copies.

 

Disclosure - I am usually a big fan of this but at the same time it is too open to interpretation. Some buyers seem to think there is a big difference between the book they're getting and the picture when I state this. I suppose if I received sufficient feedback I may revisit this.

 

Darkstar - you will use stock photo for a raw but not a CGC. That seems very silly to me and you only stated it to get a rise. With a raw you have the opportunity to show very detailed scans that you can't with a CGC. A CGC comic has their opinion of the grade and likely your opinion leading to the submission. The raw comic has only your opinion. Strange.

 

 

 

 

I sell almost exclusively brand new moderns. I sell Rachel Rising #1 and some 9.8 copies have a rub on the side which warrants a separate picture. 99% of all other books the multiples are essentially the exact same quality.

 

If you were to look up, "posse" in the dictionary, It wouldn't say, "a way of dismissing other opinions". I loosely used that word in the correct context.Keep in mind that I even put quotation marks around It to emphasize the slight sarcasm. Perhaps you don't know what the word means?

 

"Disclosure - I am usually a big fan of this but at the same time it is too open to interpretation. Some buyers seem to think there is a big difference between the book they're getting and the picture when I state this. I suppose if I received sufficient feedback I may revisit this."

 

Usually? Why am I not surprised? You've already received negative feedback from good-standing board members just within the last hour or so. You ever stop to wonder why some buyers seem to think there might be a big difference between the book they're getting and the display picture? Apparently some people do need to receive sufficient feedback to reconsider their methods.

 

 

 

You're just being silly. Carry on.

[Darkowl]

Take a nap and miss the fun.

 

For the "shady" comment I offer no hassle returns. Nothing shady when a buyer is completely covered long before eBay had their returns policy.

 

"posse" - Using this as a way of dismissing other opinions is just silly. It falls into the same logic as someone talking negative about a title must not have any or someone talking positive must be sitting on 100 copies.

 

Disclosure - I am usually a big fan of this but at the same time it is too open to interpretation. Some buyers seem to think there is a big difference between the book they're getting and the picture when I state this. I suppose if I received sufficient feedback I may revisit this.

 

Darkstar - you will use stock photo for a raw but not a CGC. That seems very silly to me and you only stated it to get a rise. With a raw you have the opportunity to show very detailed scans that you can't with a CGC. A CGC comic has their opinion of the grade and likely your opinion leading to the submission. The raw comic has only your opinion. Strange.

 

 

 

 

I sell almost exclusively brand new moderns. I sell Rachel Rising #1 and some 9.8 copies have a rub on the side which warrants a separate picture. 99% of all other books the multiples are essentially the exact same quality.

 

If you were to look up, "posse" in the dictionary, It wouldn't say, "a way of dismissing other opinions". I loosely used that word in the correct context.Keep in mind that I even put quotation marks around It to emphasize the slight sarcasm. Perhaps you don't know what the word means?

 

"Disclosure - I am usually a big fan of this but at the same time it is too open to interpretation. Some buyers seem to think there is a big difference between the book they're getting and the picture when I state this. I suppose if I received sufficient feedback I may revisit this."

 

Usually? Why am I not surprised? You've already received negative feedback from good-standing board members just within the last hour or so. You ever stop to wonder why some buyers seem to think there might be a big difference between the book they're getting and the display picture? Apparently some people do need to receive sufficient feedback to reconsider their methods.

 

 

 

You're just being silly. Carry on.

 

Is that all you got, buddy?

[N/A]

Take a nap and miss the fun.

 

For the "shady" comment I offer no hassle returns. Nothing shady when a buyer is completely covered long before eBay had their returns policy.

 

"posse" - Using this as a way of dismissing other opinions is just silly. It falls into the same logic as someone talking negative about a title must not have any or someone talking positive must be sitting on 100 copies.

 

Disclosure - I am usually a big fan of this but at the same time it is too open to interpretation. Some buyers seem to think there is a big difference between the book they're getting and the picture when I state this. I suppose if I received sufficient feedback I may revisit this.

 

Darkstar - you will use stock photo for a raw but not a CGC. That seems very silly to me and you only stated it to get a rise. With a raw you have the opportunity to show very detailed scans that you can't with a CGC. A CGC comic has their opinion of the grade and likely your opinion leading to the submission. The raw comic has only your opinion. Strange.

 

 

 

 

I sell almost exclusively brand new moderns. I sell Rachel Rising #1 and some 9.8 copies have a rub on the side which warrants a separate picture. 99% of all other books the multiples are essentially the exact same quality.

 

If you were to look up, "posse" in the dictionary, It wouldn't say, "a way of dismissing other opinions". I loosely used that word in the correct context.Keep in mind that I even put quotation marks around It to emphasize the slight sarcasm. Perhaps you don't know what the word means?

 

"Disclosure - I am usually a big fan of this but at the same time it is too open to interpretation. Some buyers seem to think there is a big difference between the book they're getting and the picture when I state this. I suppose if I received sufficient feedback I may revisit this."

 

Usually? Why am I not surprised? You've already received negative feedback from good-standing board members just within the last hour or so. You ever stop to wonder why some buyers seem to think there might be a big difference between the book they're getting and the display picture? Apparently some people do need to receive sufficient feedback to reconsider their methods.

 

 

 

You're just being silly. Carry on.

 

Is that all you got, buddy?

 

Hard to argue with crazy.

[Iceman399]

Take a nap and miss the fun.

 

For the "shady" comment I offer no hassle returns. Nothing shady when a buyer is completely covered long before eBay had their returns policy.

 

"posse" - Using this as a way of dismissing other opinions is just silly. It falls into the same logic as someone talking negative about a title must not have any or someone talking positive must be sitting on 100 copies.

 

Disclosure - I am usually a big fan of this but at the same time it is too open to interpretation. Some buyers seem to think there is a big difference between the book they're getting and the picture when I state this. I suppose if I received sufficient feedback I may revisit this.

 

Darkstar - you will use stock photo for a raw but not a CGC. That seems very silly to me and you only stated it to get a rise. With a raw you have the opportunity to show very detailed scans that you can't with a CGC. A CGC comic has their opinion of the grade and likely your opinion leading to the submission. The raw comic has only your opinion. Strange.

 

 

 

 

I sell almost exclusively brand new moderns. I sell Rachel Rising #1 and some 9.8 copies have a rub on the side which warrants a separate picture. 99% of all other books the multiples are essentially the exact same quality.

 

If you were to look up, "posse" in the dictionary, It wouldn't say, "a way of dismissing other opinions". I loosely used that word in the correct context.Keep in mind that I even put quotation marks around It to emphasize the slight sarcasm. Perhaps you don't know what the word means?

 

"Disclosure - I am usually a big fan of this but at the same time it is too open to interpretation. Some buyers seem to think there is a big difference between the book they're getting and the picture when I state this. I suppose if I received sufficient feedback I may revisit this."

 

Usually? Why am I not surprised? You've already received negative feedback from good-standing board members just within the last hour or so. You ever stop to wonder why some buyers seem to think there might be a big difference between the book they're getting and the display picture? Apparently some people do need to receive sufficient feedback to reconsider their methods.

 

 

 

You're just being silly. Carry on.

 

Is that all you got, buddy?

 

Hard to argue with crazy.

 

Not impossible...give it a try

[N/A]

 

If I thought his last post was in any way serious then I would have. I gave it a good go didn't I?

[Darkowl]

Take a nap and miss the fun.

 

For the "shady" comment I offer no hassle returns. Nothing shady when a buyer is completely covered long before eBay had their returns policy.

 

"posse" - Using this as a way of dismissing other opinions is just silly. It falls into the same logic as someone talking negative about a title must not have any or someone talking positive must be sitting on 100 copies.

 

Disclosure - I am usually a big fan of this but at the same time it is too open to interpretation. Some buyers seem to think there is a big difference between the book they're getting and the picture when I state this. I suppose if I received sufficient feedback I may revisit this.

 

Darkstar - you will use stock photo for a raw but not a CGC. That seems very silly to me and you only stated it to get a rise. With a raw you have the opportunity to show very detailed scans that you can't with a CGC. A CGC comic has their opinion of the grade and likely your opinion leading to the submission. The raw comic has only your opinion. Strange.

 

 

 

 

I sell almost exclusively brand new moderns. I sell Rachel Rising #1 and some 9.8 copies have a rub on the side which warrants a separate picture. 99% of all other books the multiples are essentially the exact same quality.

 

If you were to look up, "posse" in the dictionary, It wouldn't say, "a way of dismissing other opinions". I loosely used that word in the correct context.Keep in mind that I even put quotation marks around It to emphasize the slight sarcasm. Perhaps you don't know what the word means?

 

"Disclosure - I am usually a big fan of this but at the same time it is too open to interpretation. Some buyers seem to think there is a big difference between the book they're getting and the picture when I state this. I suppose if I received sufficient feedback I may revisit this."

 

Usually? Why am I not surprised? You've already received negative feedback from good-standing board members just within the last hour or so. You ever stop to wonder why some buyers seem to think there might be a big difference between the book they're getting and the display picture? Apparently some people do need to receive sufficient feedback to reconsider their methods.

 

 

 

You're just being silly. Carry on.

 

Is that all you got, buddy?

 

Hard to argue with crazy.

 

I guess this means you surrender.

[N/A]

Yup. You were completely and I walked away. With your ongoing misinterpretations I suppose that equals surrender.

[Iceman399]

Take a nap and miss the fun.

 

For the "shady" comment I offer no hassle returns. Nothing shady when a buyer is completely covered long before eBay had their returns policy.

 

"posse" - Using this as a way of dismissing other opinions is just silly. It falls into the same logic as someone talking negative about a title must not have any or someone talking positive must be sitting on 100 copies.

 

Disclosure - I am usually a big fan of this but at the same time it is too open to interpretation. Some buyers seem to think there is a big difference between the book they're getting and the picture when I state this. I suppose if I received sufficient feedback I may revisit this.

 

Darkstar - you will use stock photo for a raw but not a CGC. That seems very silly to me and you only stated it to get a rise. With a raw you have the opportunity to show very detailed scans that you can't with a CGC. A CGC comic has their opinion of the grade and likely your opinion leading to the submission. The raw comic has only your opinion. Strange.

 

 

 

 

I sell almost exclusively brand new moderns. I sell Rachel Rising #1 and some 9.8 copies have a rub on the side which warrants a separate picture. 99% of all other books the multiples are essentially the exact same quality.

 

If you were to look up, "posse" in the dictionary, It wouldn't say, "a way of dismissing other opinions". I loosely used that word in the correct context.Keep in mind that I even put quotation marks around It to emphasize the slight sarcasm. Perhaps you don't know what the word means?

 

"Disclosure - I am usually a big fan of this but at the same time it is too open to interpretation. Some buyers seem to think there is a big difference between the book they're getting and the picture when I state this. I suppose if I received sufficient feedback I may revisit this."

 

Usually? Why am I not surprised? You've already received negative feedback from good-standing board members just within the last hour or so. You ever stop to wonder why some buyers seem to think there might be a big difference between the book they're getting and the display picture? Apparently some people do need to receive sufficient feedback to reconsider their methods.

 

 

 

You're just being silly. Carry on.

 

Is that all you got, buddy?

 

Hard to argue with crazy.

 

I guess this means you surrender.

 

You gunna let him get away with that

[Darkowl]

Yup. You were completely and I walked away. With your ongoing misinterpretations I suppose that equals surrender.

 

You walked away, only to return!