Signatures and avatars have been getting a little too racey

[Mushroom]

I agree with Joanna as well.......but then I turned avatar's and sig lines off almost a year ago.

[blutobc]

As a father to a 12 year old it is hard to preach proper internet activity to her when she could walk by my computer screen and see 1/2 naked gals gyrating on the screen. But Mushroom's idea of simply turning off the sig lines works for me. Just turned them off and it makes reading the threads so much easier to scroll through.

Think I'll go ahead and delete my sig line too...it wasn't very clever anyway. Corny, yes..clever, no.

[towards2112]

is my avatar acceptable?

 

Yes, very clever, or....well never mind.

 

Let's also address all you weasels that are cruising the web

while at work. Hmmm,,,, screwing off on the company nickel.

Now that's a really adult attitude. Great team player....

No wonder you have to look over your shoulder. If I was

breaking one off in the boss, I'd look over the shoulder

expecting one broke off in me..

 

I suppose my posting a woman's , one that I find very

beautiful, beautiful enough that I married it, AND the rest of

the package, brains, guts, and ambition, might just offend

some of the sac-less, politically correct among you. Well toughschnitz.

One of the whitless brain trust here had the balls to insult my

wife by saying she resembled a tramp from some porn

magazine. I fired off a scathing redfaced flaming remark.

Whoever the mod at the time was pulled it almost immediately

and I am ashamed that I posted it now, but I still am pissed

by this jerks half wit statement.

 

If the mods want a less risque avatar so be it.

BUT my opinion is if you want to participate in this great

venture, then dive in, if not, go play in the kiddie pool.

 

I'm done. Gee.... I'm almost as pissed now as I was then....

I

[Joanna]

For what it's worth, towards, I could look at that DC logo forever and a day. It has wonderful associations for me.

 

-- Sac-less

[casey1870]

I'm not offended whatsoever.Can't these be turned off in your personal preferences?...................

[THE_BEYONDER]

Joanna,

 

Do you consider GA bondage covers offensive?

 

Drawings. Just drawings.

 

- Joanna

 

Then you weren't offended/annoyed when I had this image in my sig line?

 

 

 

I kinda miss it....

[s-man]

Joanna,

 

Do you consider GA bondage covers offensive?

 

Drawings. Just drawings.

 

- Joanna

 

Then you weren't offended/annoyed when I had this image in my sig line?

 

 

 

I kinda miss it....

 

Gotta love that art book of his!

[THE_BEYONDER]

Joanna,

 

Do you consider GA bondage covers offensive?

 

Drawings. Just drawings.

 

- Joanna

 

Then you weren't offended/annoyed when I had this image in my sig line?

 

 

 

I kinda miss it....

 

Gotta love that art book of his!

 

I'd love to find the original art to that Kitty pic...

[Joanna]

Then you weren't offended/annoyed when I had this image in my sig line?

 

 

 

I kinda miss it....

 

Not offended, but it sure takes up a lot of room. I should probably turn off avatars and sigs, but I really like some of them.

[OldGuy]

I should probably turn off avatars and sigs, but I really like some of them.

 

Two words: Firefox Adblock

[Architecht]

Still getting some concern about a few specific avatars (coughbrockleycough).

[deathlok]

Fair is fair, Arch (coughGmancough)

[Ares]

the architech av looks a little racy....

 

with creeps like me it conjurs all sorts of images in my head leading me to temptations