Whats a GA book everyone wants, that means noting to you? 6 6

[gino2paulus2]

2 hours ago, entalmighty1 said:

You really have some gorgeous stuff Gino!!

Right back at ya brother!! thanks!!

[originalisbest]

On 2/1/2018 at 11:41 AM, Sqeggs said:

PCH, including most ECs.  Most FH, including all but a couple of books in the Planet run.

Boooooooooooo!

[originalisbest]

22 hours ago, Gotham Kid said:

I would NEVER buy this book and sell it IMMEDIATELY if I came into possession of one.

With all the mega-classics, odds are I'd be forced to sell only because I'd have a better use for that much $. So for me the only answer is I need to find TWO of any given key. One to keep, one to sell!

[originalisbest]

13 hours ago, comicnoir said:

Injury to eye motifs. I love the Mister Mystery run, but #12 makes me wince.

That's the beauty of it! Uncompromising for uncompromising tastes!

[originalisbest]

On 2/2/2018 at 8:55 PM, batman_fan said:

 I need to retreat to my safe space.

I could live without Wonder, but not that Silver Streak. Different strokes I guess!

[originalisbest]

On 2/2/2018 at 11:35 PM, catman76 said:

Almost every one that everyone wants, I can't even think of an exception off the top of my head I have any interest in. Action 1, Detective 27, all those "keys" I have no interest in. Also, while not golden age, the first ones I thought of were the "log" issue of Gunsmoke or whatever it is and the Archie "beat off" cover. I absolutely hate that those are popular at all and people make a big deal out of them.

I can't help you out with the "log" (Richard can) but I could dig up a mid-grade "Beat off" around here somewhere...

[originalisbest]

On 2/3/2018 at 12:15 AM, Primetime said:

yep. I never wanted the 74 either. 

You're missing out!

[Primetime]

1 hour ago, originalisbest said:

You're missing out!

all good  . Probably cuz there's not enough pre code horror in me 

[Robot Man]

5 hours ago, originalisbest said:

I can't help you out with the "log" (Richard can) but I could dig up a mid-grade "Beat off" around here somewhere...

I should be ashamed of myself I know, but there is something just off the hook about books like this...

[Robot Man]

Oh, and one Rick likes a lot...

[Ricksneatstuff]

1 hour ago, Robot Man said:

Oh, and one Rick likes a lot...

[comicjack]

2 hours ago, Robot Man said:

I should be ashamed of myself I know, but there is something just off the hook about books like this...

Every time i see that Betty and Me i start humming that Michael Jackson song 

[N e r V]

6 hours ago, Robot Man said:

I should be ashamed of myself I know, but there is something just off the hook about books like this...

The Betty and Me might have been innocent at the time. Hard to tell because we know how some in the industry did like to insert things but I’m willing to give that one a benefit of a doubt at least.

We know for a fact what that issue of Eh was saying. They used a visual way to purposely say what the censors wouldn’t allow them to print. Not innocent.

Now I don’t care what year it was when that Rifleman Comic was released but there’s no way in hell they didn’t realize that that picture was wrong on so many levels. No one I know who reads or doesn’t read comics has thought that cover was not done intentionally. 

[KirbyJack]

On February 4, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Gotham Kid said:

I would NEVER buy this book and sell it IMMEDIATELY if I came into possession of one.

If I ever found myself in the position of being able to own big, golden age keys, I would value Marvel #1 more than any other comic bar none.

[Zolnerowich]

On 2/5/2018 at 7:41 AM, entalmighty1 said:

You really have some gorgeous stuff Gino!!

Super new sig line!!! (that was meant for entalmighty; but of course the same can be said for Gino!)

Edited February 7, 2018 by Zolnerowich
clarification

[sagii]

My absolute favorite of the Beat off covers, and double entendres abound here and not nice terms. 

And the line he says before beat off , that they're 'always '

How did they let that one slip?

[originalisbest]

On 2/6/2018 at 2:44 AM, N e r V said:

The Betty and Me might have been innocent at the time. Hard to tell because we know how some in the industry did like to insert things but I’m willing to give that one a benefit of a doubt at least.

We know for a fact what that issue of Eh was saying. They used a visual way to purposely say what the censors wouldn’t allow them to print. Not innocent.

Now I don’t care what year it was when that Rifleman Comic was released but there’s no way in hell they didn’t realize that that picture was wrong on so many levels. No one I know who reads or doesn’t read comics has thought that cover was not done intentionally. 

You can tell by the grins on both faces the Rifleman boys were yukking it up. EH! #4 is a great example and pretty overt, but Betty and Me #16 absolutely wasn't innocent, they knew exactly what they were highlighting; just couldn't go any further on an Archie cover.

[originalisbest]

On 2/7/2018 at 12:44 PM, sagii said:

My absolute favorite of the Beat off covers, and double entendres abound here and not nice terms. 

And the line he says before beat off , that they're 'always '

How did they let that one slip?

I would give this one the benefit of the doubt before Betty and Me #16; apart from the obvious potential in the word choices, there's nothing whatsoever titillating about the cover. Unless war can serve as a kinky turn-on, that is.