brasseye Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 You definitely made the right call... a vast improvement over the WM copy... and I'm guessing a few shekles less in the asking price (thumbs u Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffro. Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 I've been looking for a nice centered copy of this book for a while now. I went after the CLINK White Mountain 8.0 and I'm glad my offer was rejected as this one came along soon after with a cleaner right edge. I had the same thing happen to me. had an offer on CLink rejected and then within a week someone offered me the same book at about the same price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nik Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Very sweet, congrats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeypost Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 I've been looking for a nice centered copy of this book for a while now. I went after the CLINK White Mountain 8.0 and I'm glad my offer was rejected as this one came along soon after with a cleaner right edge. Holy *spoon* dude, nice pickup. I have a 6.5 copy and the prices 7.0's and up are getting I will have to wait for a rich relative to die in order to upgrade. p.s. I have no rich relatives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 I've been looking for a nice centered copy of this book for a while now. I went after the CLINK White Mountain 8.0 and I'm glad my offer was rejected as this one came along soon after with a cleaner right edge. pretty book. interesting that the notes about all the 1st appearances don't mention Bruce Banner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raphael Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 i dont think i've ever seen a nicer copy for that book before Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topofthetotem Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Great looking copy grails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlowUpTheMoon Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 I'll follow-up that fantastic Hulk with a less impressive one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbud73 Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Out maneuvered PI for this UXM 398 9.9 Always like that cover too - this is also IMO that last period where UXM was anything approaching a half decent book. Why I continue to buy it I have no idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofwhales Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 That #1 hulk is just crazy nice. (thumbs u Also nice book BUTM i like that cover. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 I'll follow-up that fantastic Hulk with a less impressive one. okay, explain the label on this one to me. reholder candidate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlowUpTheMoon Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 I'll follow-up that fantastic Hulk with a less impressive one. okay, explain the label on this one to me. reholder candidate? There's a discussion about this book HERE. Although the inner cover is a 9.6, the page quality knocks it down four full grades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MutantKeys Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 First time I see that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlowUpTheMoon Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 New to me too. I opened the CGC box this morning, tore away the packing material, saw the "interior cover 9.6" and thought I was golden. Called CGC and got the explanation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cd4ever Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Wow. That's a majpr hit for page quality, from 9.6 to 8.5 I wonder if they have a documented rule saying Light Tan can't be over 8.5 or if it's all subjective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greggy Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Wow. That's a majpr hit for page quality, from 9.6 to 8.5 I wonder if they have a documented rule saying Light Tan can't be over 8.5 or if it's all subjective. They've told me that there are limits on a grade depending on PQ. I've seen CGC light tan to OW and it's not pretty so I'm not surprised by the hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlowUpTheMoon Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Wow. That's a majpr hit for page quality, from 9.6 to 8.5 I wonder if they have a documented rule saying Light Tan can't be over 8.5 or if it's all subjective. They've told me that there are limits on a grade depending on PQ. I've seen CGC light tan to OW and it's not pretty so I'm not surprised by the hit. Greggy's right. That's the way the grader explained it to me this morning. I had no idea the downgrade would be so severe, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver Surfer Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 I'll follow-up that fantastic Hulk with a less impressive one. Hey I love this book. Let me know if you want to make a quick profit on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detroit MIke Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Thanks to Brent over at QualityComix... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWatcher Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Now that's a haul! Wow, huge congrats! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
