• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Has anyone seen a picture of the Blue label 9.2 Detective comics #27 on the census?
1 1

143 posts in this topic

1 minute ago, sfcityduck said:
4 minutes ago, Gotham Kid said:

I was thinking of this one ...

https://www.ageofcomics.store/

Capture.thumb.JPG.b161e1fa9e8ed7c44b6004bd58ebfe79.JPG

Where's the WW 1 Solicitation Copy and ashcan?  They should be next to those two!

I think they only bought those two. They chose not to buy the WW 1 9.0 when all 3 were offered on ebay. At least I have never seen it mentioned on their site.

Edited by Gotham Kid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

btw the books are NOT sold (even though they are indicated as such ) : they are both available for anyone interested. Asking prices however are :whatthe:

iirc they wanted 2 Mil for the AS8

Edited by Gotham Kid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sfcityduck said:

My mistake.  I was thinking of this picture:

image.jpeg.2e0e0137bc1fecc6b8594c3cc103b306.jpeg

 

Did he actually add Gal Gadot to his collection? That is crazy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, DC Fan said:

The photo is also at the  top of page 3 of this thread.

image.png.f6b89d17f2105bf57a461ba9e25cfcb2.png

Beautiful book!  Those corners are sharp!

Wonder what it have graded at if there had been no erasure of the "C"[?] right of the issue number.  Does that erasure mark it down more than the slight (seems cleaned) dust shadow upper right?  To my eyes, I'd say yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, G.A.tor said:
1 hour ago, DC Fan said:

The photo is also at the  top of page 3 of this thread.

image.png.f6b89d17f2105bf57a461ba9e25cfcb2.png

I believe that’s a mock up and not the actual pic of the 9.2

even the serial number is not legit 

correct

Edited by Gotham Kid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, chrisco37 said:

The fonts are all wrong in the number and the title.  

It's like they hired an outside firm to do it- like they didn't know what the CGC label really looked like (or what a 9.2 Detective #27 looks like :insane:)

Edited by rob_react
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, rob_react said:

Poking around, it looks like the above was mocked up using the Heritage CGC 8.0. It's been trimmed and cleaned up in Photoshop, but the dust shadow is the same. 

 

 

image.png.f6b89d17f2105bf57a461ba9e25cfcb2.jpg

Bingo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
1 1