• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

C**S ... is it true?
6 6

126 posts in this topic

On 8/28/2022 at 9:30 AM, CGC Mike said:

There will be no links to the competitors site, no images of competitors slabs, or no promoting our competitors.  I have seen the first 2.  I allow a ton of stuff to be posted on this forum.  I draw the line on these 3 things.   I don't think that is too much to ask.  This thread is still here.  Carry on with it, and keep the 3 things I mentioned in mind before posting.  

 

I absolutely agree with these guidelines

Links allow cross contamination, and its a prudent policy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/27/2022 at 11:35 PM, FlyingDonut said:

Are you actually reading the posts? Everything in this thread about your competitor is bashing them and saying how crappy they are. These posts are akin to someone coming on a Chevy forum and saying Ford sucks. Get a little thicker skin.

Yea, there is plenty of insulting of the people on the other forum and even a grade school "small genitals" comment, you're right.  But.. there's a high level of insecurity here when it comes to competition, well beyond simply posting pictures of a competitor's label.  Notice how people have to edit the names of the companies by replacing letters with asterisks?  It's all very strange.

Maybe **C just feels vulnerable with all the major embarrassments they've suffered in the news lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/28/2022 at 12:24 AM, MAR1979 said:

PSA is the Gold or Platinum standard for Sports Card grading currently, like it or not and I don't but it is them.   Beckett carries a negative cachet for a solid majority buyers and sellers compared to PSA.   About 15 years ago for short time Becket was on top in terms of perception then they put on clinic of what not to do and how to dilute a brand.   Not that PSA is any great shakes but they are firmly #1 and SGC and Beckett are niche so too is CGC card grading.   PSA to card what CGC currently is to Comics, but things can change and I sure hope they do.

Do people still call CGC "the PGX of card grading"?  I know they were for quite a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/29/2022 at 8:11 AM, Nic8612 said:

Well, you're wrong. But keep protecting the fragile feelings of your overlords. All heil Blackstone!

The policy of forbidding competitor books, news, links, and anything else by name has existed since long before CGC was taken over.  It's a reasonable policy for a company to hold, in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
On 8/29/2022 at 8:11 AM, Nic8612 said:
On 8/28/2022 at 9:30 AM, CGC Mike said:

  I don't think that is too much to ask.  

 

Well, you're wrong. But keep protecting the fragile feelings of your overlords. All heil Blackstone!

.

On 8/29/2022 at 8:32 AM, Nic8612 said:
On 8/29/2022 at 8:26 AM, Lord Gemini said:

Good Lord, the whining and tantrums over a simple rule. :eyeroll:

A rule based on nothing but the insecurities of the owners. Can you imagine if Facebook banned everyone that mentioned Twitter? It's a small, pathetic way to run a business. 

You have been repeatedly going into several threads with the sole intent to bash CGC.  This disrupts the natural conversations in threads.  I am going to put this one and only warning right here, that you are walking on this ice.  I want it to stop right now, or I will make it stop.  

THE PHILOSOPHY USED TO MODERATE THESE BOARDS

CGC encourages free thinking and open discussion of the comic book collecting hobby among users of the Boards, including constructive criticism. CGC values its members and Boards users as part of a joint effort to protect and improve the collectibles market. Nonetheless, while diverse views and alternative perspectives are welcome here, the Boards are not the place for negative or persistent agendas against other users or CGC’s services.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/29/2022 at 8:57 AM, CGC Mike said:

.

You have been repeatedly going into several threads with the sole intent to bash CGC.  This disrupts the natural conversations in threads.  I am going to put this one and only warning right here, that you are walking on this ice.  I want it to stop right now, or I will make it stop.  

THE PHILOSOPHY USED TO MODERATE THESE BOARDS

CGC encourages free thinking and open discussion of the comic book collecting hobby among users of the Boards, including constructive criticism. CGC values its members and Boards users as part of a joint effort to protect and improve the collectibles market. Nonetheless, while diverse views and alternative perspectives are welcome here, the Boards are not the place for negative or persistent agendas against other users or CGC’s services.

Whatever helps you sleep better at night, big guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/29/2022 at 8:46 AM, namisgr said:

The policy of forbidding competitor books, news, links, and anything else by name has existed since long before CGC was taken over.  It's a reasonable policy for a company to hold, in my opinion.

I'm aware. It was dumb then and it's dumb now. If you're stifling the speech and opinions of others to protect someone giving you money, it doesn't matter your reasoning. You're the bad guy. Always.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/29/2022 at 6:55 AM, Sigur Ros said:

Yea, there is plenty of insulting of the people on the other forum and even a grade school "small genitals" comment, you're right.  But.. there's a high level of insecurity here when it comes to competition, well beyond simply posting pictures of a competitor's label.  Notice how people have to edit the names of the companies by replacing letters with asterisks?  It's all very strange.

Maybe **C just feels vulnerable with all the major embarrassments they've suffered in the news lately.

Maybe people are jholes no matter where they are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/28/2022 at 1:28 AM, The Meta said:

Not to mention the forum is run by tiny people with tiny genitalia 

Its hard core clique based and no ability to retain any sense of continuity or relevant knowledge 

Oh, and the clique abhors CGC, though not sure if the bashing has subsided since someone left

Quite funny to read given mod’s frequent actions in this thread :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
6 6