PGM X-men #6

[jeranimal]

Nice glossy front cover with some frayed edges. Back cover needs a little more help. Let me know how you would grade it! Thanks

 

[burntboy]

this is a toughie...........maybe that's why no one is opining..........structurally it looks well-maintained with just some minimal spine stress and that rough upper edge to contend with on the FC. the BC has the same rough upper edge and a bit more spine stress is visible due to the miswrap.

 

but the BC has an overall dirty look (general ink transfer?) that makes it look a bit unattractive. hard to say, but i'd guess in the 7.0 - 7.5 area due to the minimal structural defects,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

[Point Five]

Exactly where I came out... 7.0/7.5 neighborhood. Nice one!

[Dad&Son-migration]

I'd say 7.0 !! Nice copy you have there.

[jeranimal]

7.0/7.5 - That's about what I expected. The back has some ink transfer but I think the scan makes it look worse than it does "in hand." There is, however, a small tear in the top of the comic near the upper right corner.

 

Thanks for the grades.

[Aces]

7.0

[jeranimal]

Anybody else want to take a guess? Do I need bigger scans?

[sterlingcomics]

Bigger is better.

 

I'd personally call this a FN+, that damn Marvel chipping turns me off.

[jeranimal]

I rescanned them but photobucket still resizes them. Thanks for the grades.

 

Does CGC take off alot for the chipping?

[sterlingcomics]

I rescanned them but photobucket still resizes them. Thanks for the grades.

 

Does CGC take off alot for the chipping?

 

That's a good question. No experience there...anybody?

[Dr_Neff]

5.5-6.0 may not be able to encapsulate if there is overhang at the top

 

pretty nice copy of a HTF book though

 

I don't think chipping would affect your grade, especially if the chipping origin was production flaw and not wear and tear so to speak...

 

Also has the book been trimmed on the right?

[Inhuman Fiend]

6.0

[action1kid]

5.5