• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

brute_nm

Member
  • Posts

    102
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by brute_nm

  1. On 2/17/2024 at 9:11 AM, brute_nm said:

    Let me rephrase the question so @CGC Mike can more clearly ask the team: what is the difference between strike-thru, new grade date with blank grade, and new grade date with old grade

    I thought strike-thru meant the book has been rechecked but this is not the case.  Here is a list of all the books that have new grade dates (in 2024).  The yellow highlighted books were regraded in 2024 but do NOT have a strike-thru on CGC's list.  There is no consistency with books that have strike-thru and REMOVED grades.  There is no consistency with books that have strike-thru and VERIFIED grades.

    strike-thru.thumb.png.eaa0d54a7862d8a022722105db698fda.png

    Further, what is the protocol for these books?  Are all legit books given new cert numbers?  Do some maintain their old cert number?  Are all fraudulent books left on census but with grades removed?  Are they re-graded to have correct grades and new cert numbers?  What does it mean to have a new grade date but old cert number?  What does it mean when the grade is vacated?  Why does this have to be so complicated ???  Can we get a simple list from CGC of all books that have been checked so far, which were deemed legit, and which were deemed fraudulent.

    We need some consistency and transparency with how these books are being handled to start rebuilding confidence in ALL cert numbers.

     

    @CGC Mike :bump: for any new info

  2. On 2/19/2024 at 2:05 PM, sledgehammer said:

    I just took a look at the summary on page one, to see if that azwildcatz520, eBay user ID has been noted before.

    I might have missed you noting it in one of your other posts, but that certainly seems like it would be another iteration of his user ID names.

    @brute_nm

    Thanks for the heads up! I had overlooked that.

    I added azwildcatz520 to the thread summary post. If you or @comicwiz has a better idea of timeframe this username was active on eBay, please let me know and I'll update that, too.

    Edit: I added it as unconfirmed until we find more corroborating evidence, because he may have just recycled scamboy's picture for that ASM 300 sale.  Please let me know if you find other listings or sales with our favorite rug background.  The eBay account has been around since 2007 and has great feedback selling cards, so I don't want to falsely accuse and tarnish an innocent seller's reputation.

  3. On 2/16/2024 at 1:26 PM, Nick Furious said:

    Curious if anyone knows what ever became of the Mark Jeweler book that started this whole thread?  

    4277700004 Amazing Spider-Man #252 9.8 Mark Jewelers is still out there. It has not been sent back to CGC and is therefore still on the census.

    I can't imagine the buyer doesn't know. Maybe they're waiting for the storm to blow over so they can resell. Or let it live in infamy as "the book that started it all" or something. Or maybe pursuing charges of their own and don't want to surrender the evidence to CGC. (shrug)

  4. On 2/13/2024 at 10:29 AM, KCOComics said:

    Kenny Sanderson! PM me and I can give you contact info.  

    He's the best in the business and will have it to you in less than 14 years,  guaranteed!!!

    This 1000x, @paulailp. If there's anyone who can salvage this mess, it's Kenny. Check out sanderson_studios on IG - he has great progress posts (pics and video clips) where you can see his amazing work.

  5. On 2/10/2024 at 4:29 PM, sledgehammer said:

    What a submission. (worship)

    None of them on the list.

    October 4, 2023

    5 copies of ASM 300. Each one 9.8

    This one of them goes up for auction on comiclink on 2/15.

    4336086005

     

     

    Here's a submission. Neither book has a custom label  grade date  11/28/2023.

    Auction starts for 001 on comiclink, Thursday.

    ASM 252  9.8 direct. On the list

    https://www.cgccomics.com/certlookup/4357311002/

    ASM 252  9.8 newsstand. Not on the list

    https://www.cgccomics.com/certlookup/4357311001/

    When are they going to explain WHY??

     

     

    @COMICLINK how can y'all guarantee authenticity of these slabs given a) they were submitted by a known scammer, b) they were in the same submission as other suspected fraudulent books, and c) they have not been sent back to CGC for verification

  6. On 2/9/2024 at 7:16 AM, jas1vans said:

     

     

    Wait, what!?

    So, since the early 2000's there have been people who have had special access to get to skip the process? To certify valuable collectables? And this is only the second time there has been a big, somebody's been slabbing comics that might not match the label scandal? (Trimming being the first one. I only read about it, didn't live through it.)

    I am not shocked that there is a group of people with special access. I am surprised there isn't more vocal backlash against it, especially after reading the venom that flew around in some of those older threads.

    @CGC Mike, can we get an updated statement? Any comment on the 2 lawsuits? What's the status of the hot 350 list? When can affected people expect to get paid or their book(s) back? Bueller? Bueller?

    The rumor mill is kicking into overdrive.

  7. On 2/8/2024 at 2:25 PM, Panda2 said:

    Well, just got the notification that my book had indeed been tampered with - now I guess we wait and see what happens.  The email states it may be a few weeks before I hear anything further.

    Thanks for keeping us in the loop! I imagine CGC may make you sign an NDA at some point, but I think it's important to hear how the process works. So thanks for telling us what you can.

  8. On 2/7/2024 at 7:57 AM, I like pie said:

    If he was the best we had, of course I'd want him out there. Even more so via your scenario. 

    If CGC is short talented graders, it's up to Matt to decide if it better serves the company delegating his duties or getting his hands dirty.

    My magic 8-ball theory is Matt Nelson will "decide" to go back to being the head grader, maybe with some PR story about him going back to his true passion or something. Then Blackstone will announce his replacement: some corporate businessperson to oversee the operations and growth opportunities, a position that requires no experience in grading/resto.

    It would be a move to save face (Matt Nelson no longer president after these scandals happened on his watch), while also not losing such vital comic book expertise (retained at company in different capacity).

    Just a thought.

  9. On 2/4/2024 at 8:40 AM, sledgehammer said:

    Looks like there is another action against them, filed on 12/23, by an unrelated company in vermont.

    https://www.bizapedia.com/vt/lakoda-mountain-house-llc.html

    I think that's them creating a business (LLC) in VT.

    They also just opened one in Scottsdale, AZ on 2-Jan: https://opencorpdata.com/us-az/23624236

    Is this some way of hiding liability under their LLC(s)? i.e., if they knew CGC was onto them and they'd eventually end up in court, is this a preemptive attempt at limiting their own personal liabilities? 

  10. On 2/2/2024 at 1:24 PM, BeardedBubba said:

    I've worked for companies that required me to get someone to unlock a cabinet so I could get supplies like pens and paper.  It's shocking if CGC blindly trusted all employees around our books.  The phrase "keeping them honest" comes to mind here.

    "If you want to take a Hulk 1 back to your desk, submit as your own, maybe even make a new label to bump its grade, FINE. But keep your STINKIN' hands OFF the padfolios"

  11. On 2/2/2024 at 6:02 AM, dbcn said:

    I hope CGC can issue some kind of public statement about this & control the narrative a bit - otherwise this is going to go rumor/conspiracy theory heavy quick.

    @CGC Mike

    On 2/2/2024 at 7:17 AM, Mayor006 said:

    Anyone know what this means for Comiclink having sold books that were misrepresented?

    @COMICLINK

    Any comments?