• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Ken Aldred

Member
  • Posts

    18,607
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ken Aldred

  1. I also thought that Krigstein and Frazetta were 'quite good' as well. I’d rate all three as Gem Mint, 10.0
  2. I just watched Jessica Jones Season 1. Great series, and noticed that the film's director also did its first episode. Not bad at all, but quite different to doing a big budget, CGI-heavy super-hero film, and an unsuccessful transition, in this case.
  3. He didn't like it, then? It's unclear.
  4. From what's been said so far, that shows an admirable degree of resilience to make it through to that point.
  5. Yup. There is, potentially anyway, some quality on the horizon this year, for a change. Two nicely-contrasting choices there, tonally speaking.
  6. I suppose we all have certain comics or writers and artists that we get carried away with a bit, and could do with a little more constraint and objectivity. Mine are the New Trend ECs, especially Weird Science and Weird Fantasy, which absolutely stunned me when I first read them in the early 80s as the Library hardcovers. Still some of my all-time favourite comics to this day. As you can tell.
  7. Yup. That's the problem with convincing EC fanboys like myself. We consider those books to be absolutely untouchable in terms of sheer quality. A short period of absolute brilliance in comics.
  8. The series did have some great talents working on them; Dave Stevens, Al Williamson, Bruce Jones, Richard Corben. True enough.
  9. I’ve always thought that The Batman sounds more respectful and ominous. Like The Spectre.
  10. And, they didn’t really work, let alone recapture the magic, even back then.
  11. I doubt it will replicate the magic of the original books. Product of their time. Some very good creators, but basically just indie SF / horror, not dissimilar to modern Image Comics, despite the label. Or, reminiscent of Twisted Tales and Alien Worlds from Pacific Comics.
  12. I'm always wary when a phrase like that is used. Especially when they're trying to outdo a creative genius like Kirby. A tall order. As a precedent again, Josh Trank brought a fresh perspective to the team, and that went really well.
  13. Or, to put it another way, following my bit of research about Bronze Age DC '48 pagers' ... 38 pages of new comics? 38 pages ? Back in my day, when I was a young 'un, we only got 25 ! You should be glad ! And, a Hostess Twinkie Ad. Occasionally by Neal Adams. And we were grateful.
  14. I've just had a look back at one of the DC "48 pages, All New !" comics from mid 1978, where the actual page count of new story material turns out to be 25 pages. The OP shouldn't get so worked up. Plus ça change.
  15. Yup. I just couldn't be bothered this afternoon to go on GCD to fine tune my post.
  16. 130’s to 140’s period, just after the Celestial Madonna storyline.
  17. Back in the 70s, if I’d been promised 20 pages of Frank Robbins artwork but the book only had 16 pages, I would’ve been quite relieved.
  18. Seems to be endemic at the supermarket these days.
  19. Perhaps not generally safe advice, as some fanboys may suffer abrupt newsprint odour withdrawal on sudden, unfamiliar exposure to fresh air.
  20. In the 21st century we have seen widespread examples of shrinkflation and perhaps have become somewhat numb to it.
  21. My advice is, just enjoy the comic. In the 70s, we were down to 16 or 17 pages of material.
  22. Or, as he’d be known if he was a modern comic book character, Sharknado.
  23. Sometimes I’ll post, my mood will change, and I’ll think it’s a bit rubbish and then remove it.