Mr.Mcknowitall

We still need the R equation.....

Well, once upon a time there was 2 posts, the first post, and then the edited post one minute after. And lo and behold, the Blond Prince copied the the first post (it was scary boys and girls), thinking if it was changed by the Knowitall Monster, he would be able to time trap him. The Monster had actually already protected his lair, 6 minutes before, because he saw the Blonde coming a mile away. The Blond Prince was by the Knowitall Monster, and never hunted Knowitalls forever after. The End

Yea,...... no. Time counter shows your post after correction. 6 minute math fail. Time to go back to pickup sticks. I will have you know it is Mc, before that Knowitall....Royalty and all that, old chap. One should know ones' place in society. , because you never know around here.

Are you by any chance Blond?

See Edit

Blonds.......

GxR_ is missing R = Rarity R5 = 1-5 COPIES R4 = 6-10 COPIES R3= 11-15 COPIES. Etc.

GxR_ is missing R = Rarity R5 = 1-5 COPIES R4 = 6-10 COPIES R6 = 11-15 COPIES. Etc.

4 out of 5 Doctors recommend the Stan Estate.....

Generally, and I certainly am not casting aspersions, people don't aspire to Spam as a 1st choice food group. Poll after poll supports this. Spam afficiandos are often described as enviously jealous of people with more normal tastes. An experiment would be: change the picture high to a picture of a KC barbecued Prime cut steak, and we can track if post likes increase..........., because you never know around here.

Stu???

Thank you. Suspension vs. Strike does not negate my questions directed to Mr. Logan, because he has not disclosed his present or past status with the entity, when it occurred, and whether or not he is still in a hold pattern with the entity. This, to me, indicates nondisclosure to the OP, when he stated the comments concerning you to the OP, and did so for fair and balanced reasons. It does cause me to suspect a false flag was being presented to the OP. That is never honorable behavior.

Misdirection and avoidance. All this does is exhibit your intentions were disingenuous, and you were misleading the OP. You again avoid the questions I asked. Why? Why be intentionally determined to avoid simple questions that would not leave a cloud of suspicion about your reasons for mentioning RMA, but not your own fall from grace with the entity? It is of course your Right to have the possibility of a cloud darkening opinions of your integrity and honesty on the Boards and dealings with other members, and their opinions. I don't understand the reason for doing so, but if you want to avoid the issue and misdirect the converstion, that is up to you.

Thank you. Then that would be fair and balanced information that should be disclosed, if the goal is fair and balanced information, as Mr. Logan states was the reason for mentioning your standing with the entity. To me, this certainly makes his comments suspect. Is it possible the terms of the suspension may be preventing Him from offering an opinion on the entity, especially if it is negative?

Avoidance and misdirection. Intentional disinformation, by omitting fair and balanced in formation. Were you banned by the same entity? Setting that aside, why are you avoiding straight forward opinion about the entities....as asked by the OP? Would you not agree that would be fair and balanced information, which you claim is your objective. Do you or don't you have a reason to disparage RMA, other than a dislike for him? Concerning the issue of your banning from the same entity, would you be willing to disclose why, if true, and why your opinion of RMA would not be as suspect?

SS

I agree. Especially information and opinion concerning the question being asked.

Humblebrag....

That is best.

Very negative, for a person seeking information and opinions, and supposedly wants valid information. It is a public forum. I do not see you making the same requests concerning posts having to do with non-specific issues. that is a bit selective. I have an opinion. I stated same. Have you received an opinion from the member that gave the opinion of another member, and did so without giving you an opinion of the targeted subject of your post? No, he has not. I am starting to wonder if you have an ulterior motive for your request.

I do think it is necessary. He stated the subject of 'fair and balanced" being of importance. Why would you not want his opinion about the question you presented? I think it does make progress, and I think it does add additional information, in that now you are not just assuming it is valid that a member is possibly spiteful and suspect in stating truthful comments. After all, he was banned, according to some members, by the same entity. That is a valid consideration that is equal to the weight you have given to the commentary about RMA, is it not? That does provide new information for you to consider, i would think.

Then it may have been better to have posted your own opinion about the business entity, instead of remarking on the possibly suspicious post by another member. You would be then be presenting a fair and balanced opinion...the most desirable method of evaluation of a subject, instead of posting what can be interpreted as, and has the appearance of, negation of what may be a valid assessment, by using accusatory commentary...re-direction, if you will. What is your opinion of the entities? That is what the original question is. You have not offered one, as of now.

I think it was already personal. Mr. Logan can address that. I do not find the comments of Mr. Logan valid, and have stated why. i do not know or have personally met either Mr. Logan or RMA. I have never read any post by RMA that transmits negative information based on spite or retribution. Maybe you should read the post history of both members, before stating that you will have to re-evaluate the comments of RMA based on being banned. That would be your choice. Maybe your request to not make it personal should have been addressed to the post by Mr. Logan, as opposed to implying I am making it personal. I am not.

I may be interpreting incorrectly... are you stating that RMA was banned (I don't know one way or another), and accordingly anything he posts on the subject is suspect, and therefore not "fair and balanced".....implying lack of honesty and integrity and valid opinion concerning the OP question ('s)? Or, is this your personal comment that he is suspect, based on any Board feud you have....real or imagined, because I don't know (or care), which if it is, makes your observations concerning his integrity and honesty a bit higher level of suspect. That would be very disappointing. I have not read any post by RMA that is intentionally spiteful for the purpose of fabrication and intentionally disparaging a manufacturer without cause. i hope you are not stating your opinion for personal reasons of differences with RMA having noting to do with the subject. I am not qualified to comment on the business entity or their quality and/or lack thereof, but I would certainly be interested in your opinion.

Looks like the comic isn't the only thing that slipped...which might have caused the whole comic to slip. babuuumffff.( Will be all weekend ).