• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

jokiing

Member
  • Posts

    853
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jokiing

  1. On 7/26/2022 at 12:04 PM, dikran1 said:

    and shipped. I AM getting back a bunch of 8.0-9.2s ^^. It is what it is, most of the grades were on the lower side of estimates (not expecting many 9.8s in this batch), maybe 1-2 higher.

    I've noticed that graders are loving the 9.2 these days.

  2. I noticed the change in form just the other day when I had to return 22 out of 25 books for various reasons. Since none of them involved clerical errors only choice was Damaged in Transit and I described the issue with each as I entered them via cert #.

    No other changes to procedure as far I can tell. CGC picked up shipping and should do the same sending them back. Three books were damaged so hopefully I'll hear from CGC before they ship them back. Rest of the slabs had excessive Newton Rings, some both front and back.

  3. Well, CGC is not going to have a button suggesting that they caused the damage or missed QC issues so given the choice one just describes the issue and hope it's fixed. They know were the problem lays but adding a third "Reason for return"  button isn't in their interest. I use a sharpie to circle the problem on the slab so that they can't miss it or forget to fix it.

     

  4. On 6/28/2022 at 8:11 PM, Jon Thor said:

    Thank you @onlyweaknesskryptonite ,  i'll send them to CGC with a note explaining my preferences.   Signatures are very clear and readable.    This will be a good experiment.  I will follow up in a handful of months, as to what happened.

    Odds are in your favor that CGC will mention artist's name on label. I sent in a comic book with sig on page 1 that I forgot was there and Artist's name ended up being mentioned on blue label.

  5. On 7/22/2022 at 11:54 AM, JohnCarter1912 said:

    This statement is untrue.

    If no buyer sold a copy of Action Comics #1... that they first bought on the newsstand back in 1938... and they held it all this time... the meaningful dollar value would not be determined by 10 cents in 1938.

    It would be determined by whatever price seller chose to sell at TODAY! And Buyers, if they wanted it, would have to make deal with Seller's price as benchmark... I thought this was common knowledge

    10¢ in 1938 equals 3.5M in today's dollar

  6. On 7/18/2022 at 12:01 AM, Mutieloverx said:

    Reason I would want to do this is that there are many books that 9.8s are just too expensive. I can get 3 9.6s for the price for 1 9.8. Would It be worth it?  Could I crack and press and get 2 9.8s for the price of 1.

    Ya gotta ask yourself, do you feel lucky.... second question should be has the book already been pressed?

    The defects between a 9.8 and 9.6 are so minute that, unless this is a long term investment, it may be worth the savings for a book that displays just as well, if not better than, the all holy 9.8.

  7. Just opened a box of 25, fresh off the UPS truck. No scuffs (well, one small one) on the cases. Big improvement there.

    (22) with Newton Rings

    (2) 9.8 X-Men 1 (1991) cover pulled away from bottom staple on both. Too tight an inner well perchance.

    (1) 9.8 Thor 372 bent lower front corner.

    Also need to return Ronin 6 for the third time. First it was debris, next it was Newton Rings and now it's Newton Rings and debris.  :facepalm:

    IMG_3738.jpg

    IMG_3739.jpg

  8. On 7/17/2022 at 5:08 PM, Sand1man said:

    Incorrent.  During my phone call, CGC remarked "tape pulled from cover" and that the matter will be investigated.  Nevertheless - there never was any tape in the 1st place.

    On 7/17/2022 at 4:26 PM, Sand1man said:

    Notes.jpg

    Just 'cause I feel like.....:deadhorse:... Although the rep said "tape pulled from cover", that's not what the Grader Notes read nor how I would interpret it. First thing that came to mind was if the bag was sealed with tape(?) and when book was removed the tape snagged to bottom of the book. Very common mishap that I'm sure sends shivers down the spines of quite a few collectors upon reading this. Anyway, pretty odd situation. Guessing CGC has the book in hand to review and hopefully it will work out in your favor.