• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Microchip

Member
  • Posts

    1,781
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Microchip

  1. 37 minutes ago, ramrod44 said:

    Thank You. :foryou:

    I found the cgc 9.6 Daredevil #196 CPV on a comic website for $66! :whatthe: The cgc 9.6 Thor #337 CPV I scored for almost exactly what the 9.2 CPV sold for on CLINK. :acclaim: 

    Price wise, I would have expected the $400-500 for a 9.6 copy as well!   Thy pop up semi regularly lately, particularly graded in the 9.4 to 9.8 range.

    The DD's are like hen's teeth in the CPV's, for a high graded copy.

     

  2. 9 hours ago, rexinnih said:

    Well, since I have an Annual 14 and don't have 266, I'm a bit biased but curious to see where those 9.9's land. 

    It'll be very interesting to watch, it'd be worth laying down a few predictions on final prices...

    Annual 14. 6 9.9's

    X-men 266 there are 15 9.9's.

     

    Price range is anyones guess, but I'm thinking  they could go $10k up to $25k each.   The big thing here is the split.    Which one will go for more than the other.....

  3. 6 hours ago, Pantodude said:

     

    Those who only care about the cover often rely on scans, forgetting that CGC also evaluated the rest of the book, too (that mysterious stuff between the covers).  There might have been a small tear or stray mark on an intereior page, etc.  Too often, the "buy the book not the grade" mantra translates into "buy the cover, not the book"!   

    So, all things appearing equal from scans alone, even through well-rested eyes, there is good reason to pay extra for 9.8s.  CGC had more intimate knowledge of both books while grading them, and presumably much more experience differentiating between a 9.8 and 9.6.    

    The only point that can be added here, in relation to these two examples, is that point of grading for each book is over a decade between each of them.   

    CGC is like any environment, with continued learning, different graders, changes in personnel, market conditions, heck...even new glasses for some (myself included :cool:).   It all creates variables from one passage of time to the next.    

     It'd be interesting to see early SA issues graded at the same time for those .2 grade differences.   Not for the point of second guessing the process, but illustrating the differences that create the increments.   This something that is rarely seen, and properly understood.   Particularly in the SA, with 40-50 year old books.  

    Grading modern books at CGC has to be the easy gig in comparison ;)