-
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
-
Posts
35,948 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
CGC Journals
Gallery
Events
Store
Everything posted by ADAMANTIUM
-
I bought those 2 asm together as a bundle too, just to have copies. Similar grade and appreciation, like-minded I hope you enjoy, and if you crack them have nostalgia memories enjoying the print in your hand!
-
I'm going to start reporting your replies, cause that is not close to what I said. I posted the questions once. The Jan 3rd doesn't explain why cert numbers are being crossed off the list, nor any explanation of details whether they have been cleared and today @CGC Mike answered those questions. You're not onky baiting but getting your facts wrong. Good day
-
@MattTheMexican posting here for the thread attention, will be on the look out!
-
@Lightning55 where were you on page 535? No worries I haven't read everything either and had to prove I wasn't an insufficiently_thoughtful_person for not doing so, by admitting that videos explaining how to pull off the cgc scam is good info and doesn't post a legal threat to cgc, because it is a fact. Fact is I wouldn't have done it
-
Moderns that are heating up on ebay!
ADAMANTIUM replied to thirdgreenham's topic in Modern Age Comic Books
I was expecting the white to be doing better -
When can we expect a totally redesigned holder from CGC?
ADAMANTIUM replied to Closet Avenger's topic in Comics General
How would it affect the optics to have it printed or I wonder where they'd apply it? Seems like a small price to pay though. I haven't cracked out a lot of slabs, but is the area of the inner well around the comic large enough to be imprinted without obscuring the comic? -
-
I'm off today, with plumbing problems and a vehicle that is experiencing a battery draw from a fuse that if I pull it, it stops the drain but also kills the driving gauges, and it just keeps getting piled on from there. Big thanks to @Kramerica who I chose in the raffle, sending with utmost care! Even throwing in some extras that make it extra worthy of a day like Friday!!
-
anyway @agamoto It was just my 1st impression of these videos, same as it was weeks ago when 1st posted. I wasn't trying to argue, stated that it was imo, and that hasn't changed. No need for convincing for either of us. Possibly CGC wouldn't have a case, but I would still think they've thought of how to respond to them. I'm glad you are confident enough to pay no never mind Just something I wouldn't feel cause nor justified to do. I had missed your post on true "intent" and myself thought of 1st amendments and intent, I still think given the seriousness that it is not something that helps. Just my Opinion not worth a hill of beans, as stated
-
That's all well and good I never had a problem with that If CGC doesn't have legal repercussions then it DOES make me look to be spitting down wind, although I'm not hoping anyone gets it stuck to them. Never said that, but it ain't up to me it IS up to CGC and it is just something that "I wouldn't do" that I stated was imo in the 1st post I posted
-
Well I at least thank you for being cordial Rather than telling me my arse is dislocated by a country mile with no alternative facts suggested, only that I'm a The people "in the know" have continued to say "I know a secret" and post random instructional entertainment videos of how a current scam is being pulled off. Somehow I'm the bad guy
-
It was the no intent that got me thinking about it, but if a religious entity was the boss and an employee was somehow outed then terminated due to "facts" or in otherwise involving termination of employment due to "facts" (struggled for an example) I thought a certain party could be sued. Though I also struggle if that would be by the (former) employee against the employer or informant, or both. I'm just spitballing anyway
-
Oh that might be it I'm not looking to give legal advise either, nor am I in any kind of way to advise either. Just I didn't need these videos "to prove what the scammer did" It was already obvious, and IMO which I stated in my 1st post of this, ahem, they only exacerbate the problem. I've tried to move on several times, no one will care what I think, but even that is meant as lighthearted. I've heard justice is passionate and I don't want to interrupt that train of thought nor get in the way. The videos do nothing to help only hurt. IMO
-
and that's all I said! If those inclined had made the videos before the scam, CGC would have taken issue, and I don't see how now is any different. That and everyone wants it back at square one, wants to prosecute the scammer, but not the other people "providing entertainment" because "shame on CGC!" It made me scratch my head. hypocrites are nothing new