ADAMANTIUM

I agree cause the lousy excuse for video's , I mean cases didn't have to be perfect to get through cgc quality control. Got it! Thanks

I bought those 2 asm together as a bundle too, just to have copies. Similar grade and appreciation, like-minded I hope you enjoy, and if you crack them have nostalgia memories enjoying the print in your hand!

I'm going to start reporting your replies, cause that is not close to what I said. I posted the questions once. The Jan 3rd doesn't explain why cert numbers are being crossed off the list, nor any explanation of details whether they have been cleared and today @CGC Mike answered those questions. You're not onky baiting but getting your facts wrong. Good day

@MattTheMexican posting here for the thread attention, will be on the look out!

@Lightning55 where were you on page 535? No worries I haven't read everything either and had to prove I wasn't an insufficiently_thoughtful_person for not doing so, by admitting that videos explaining how to pull off the cgc scam is good info and doesn't post a legal threat to cgc, because it is a fact. Fact is I wouldn't have done it

I literally asked all these questions 5 pages back and no one answered me, but had the same questions I had. How soon we forget, these refreshers of cgc Mike answered those questions that no one answered. Therefore it checked my boxes

When Was I not?

That checks my boxes

I was expecting the white to be doing better

How would it affect the optics to have it printed or I wonder where they'd apply it? Seems like a small price to pay though. I haven't cracked out a lot of slabs, but is the area of the inner well around the comic large enough to be imprinted without obscuring the comic?

I'm off today, with plumbing problems and a vehicle that is experiencing a battery draw from a fuse that if I pull it, it stops the drain but also kills the driving gauges, and it just keeps getting piled on from there. Big thanks to @Kramerica who I chose in the raffle, sending with utmost care! Even throwing in some extras that make it extra worthy of a day like Friday!!

anyway @agamoto It was just my 1st impression of these videos, same as it was weeks ago when 1st posted. I wasn't trying to argue, stated that it was imo, and that hasn't changed. No need for convincing for either of us. Possibly CGC wouldn't have a case, but I would still think they've thought of how to respond to them. I'm glad you are confident enough to pay no never mind Just something I wouldn't feel cause nor justified to do. I had missed your post on true "intent" and myself thought of 1st amendments and intent, I still think given the seriousness that it is not something that helps. Just my Opinion not worth a hill of beans, as stated

Thank you for the clarity

ya The pitchforks I've heard of keeping your wicks trimmed, I guess people have their own more important views

That's all well and good I never had a problem with that If CGC doesn't have legal repercussions then it DOES make me look to be spitting down wind, although I'm not hoping anyone gets it stuck to them. Never said that, but it ain't up to me it IS up to CGC and it is just something that "I wouldn't do" that I stated was imo in the 1st post I posted

Well I at least thank you for being cordial Rather than telling me my arse is dislocated by a country mile with no alternative facts suggested, only that I'm a The people "in the know" have continued to say "I know a secret" and post random instructional entertainment videos of how a current scam is being pulled off. Somehow I'm the bad guy

It won't be you who gets their back up though I'm just curious how "CGC views them" You know since THEY'RE the ones that hired investigative services Just another post in the wind

Ok then it was instrctional or teaching? So I'm not just out of my gourd? Do you feel that you needed to know? (i didn't and is where I'm coming from) Did you think "oh that is how to extract a raw copy or how to scam cgc swap a book reseal a case?"

It was the no intent that got me thinking about it, but if a religious entity was the boss and an employee was somehow outed then terminated due to "facts" or in otherwise involving termination of employment due to "facts" (struggled for an example) I thought a certain party could be sued. Though I also struggle if that would be by the (former) employee against the employer or informant, or both. I'm just spitballing anyway

Oh that might be it I'm not looking to give legal advise either, nor am I in any kind of way to advise either. Just I didn't need these videos "to prove what the scammer did" It was already obvious, and IMO which I stated in my 1st post of this, ahem, they only exacerbate the problem. I've tried to move on several times, no one will care what I think, but even that is meant as lighthearted. I've heard justice is passionate and I don't want to interrupt that train of thought nor get in the way. The videos do nothing to help only hurt. IMO

I only took case with the videos, not comments. never said otherwise, if it is on you're mind that way, then just take a breath and reassess

and that's all I said! If those inclined had made the videos before the scam, CGC would have taken issue, and I don't see how now is any different. That and everyone wants it back at square one, wants to prosecute the scammer, but not the other people "providing entertainment" because "shame on CGC!" It made me scratch my head. hypocrites are nothing new

lighten up dork

If it is none of their business then yes. I'll admit I am stuck for an example, but if you tell someone then they in turn act but weren't in the need to know kind of thing