• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

ADAMANTIUM

Member
  • Posts

    35,948
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ADAMANTIUM

  1. but then why send it to cgc for reholder at all? If he was "good enough", he'd just sell them swapped resealed. Why send to CGC and risk getting caught?
  2. my bad someone in the other threads said they didn't need to fool cgc, so cgc needed a new case, but it wouldn't "fix it" due to someone still being able to swap the 20 years worth of cases out there. It is I who got sidetracked
  3. I don't think he was resealing well enough to pass anyone, (except the lax employee at CGC, which is @NewWorldOrder point. As for the processes That CGC has already "fixed?" I'm sure it sounded a lot like this
  4. Exactly. If he was so good at it? why was he then sending to CGC for a reholder, it and the greedy high sales is what got him caught. I think you're confusing swapping within the tamperproof case that it fooled the "eyes of whoever worked at CGC" But did he do that for his own good health? and repeatedly? that it ended up getting him caught due to CGC scanning the book? That doesn't make sense at all
  5. I think you're confusing swapping within the tamperproof case that it fooled the "eyes of whoever worked at CGC" But did he do that for his own good health? and repeatedly? that it ended up getting him caught due to CGC scanning the book? That doesn't make sense at all
  6. so I missed it, why did the person resend it to cgc in the 1st place if he didn't "have too" for the holder to not look broken out? Where is the proof of that?
  7. Meant to quote this I know right! It is just not something tangible so Idk if it will be good enough at "their word only" We'll see
  8. I think your right The problem with that thought is proving to the public "that particular safety feature" is now in place, when it is one that should have always been there. I've heard rumor that for "belief" a lot of people need something they can hold or see with their own eyes, in this case trust will have to be earned back. You're not wrong and maybe the monetary promise in the "guarantee" will smooth it over somewhat, but having also heard of youtubers, I just don't know if that will suffice. no worries I'll stick to posting in this thread @NewWorldOrder Just didn't want my last post in the other of the 3 threads to be a gif
  9. I think your right The problem with that thought is proving to the public "that particular safety feature" is now in place, when it is one that should have always been there. I've heard rumor that for "belief" a lot of people need something they can hold or see with their own eyes, in this case trust will have to be earned back. You're not wrong and maybe the monetary promise in the "guarantee" will smooth it over somewhat, but having also heard of youtubers, I just don't know if that will suffice.
  10. It was #41 from the boardie listed in screenshot if they haven't pm'd yet Glad to hear it's all good 👍
  11. Hope everything is ok? Did you at least find out what you got? I want to say it was #41 a mystery box
  12. in all fairness it seemed a little slack in randomness towards the end for people... Giving them something to help with the anticipation helps
  13. I didn't understand it either. Just waiting to see who picks mine to get deets
  14. I haven't been able to reach @WolverineX Lord willing cause I know he's soon, he'll show up and get a memo of what to do now. He had asked for updates
  15. ya I should have said something at the time, as it was still available, but you know me only if someone else gets it corrected haha I think shadroch was satisfied anyway