• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

jimbo_7071

Member
  • Posts

    4,401
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jimbo_7071

  1. On 3/21/2024 at 11:27 AM, EastEnd1 said:

    This is my recollection too... numerous videos of people being "shocked" that they'd gotten PLODs for simply "cleaning" the book with these techniques.  This is the thread I was thinking of covering this topic...

    https://boards.cgccomics.com/topic/520982-problems-with-cgc-grading-a-cleaned-and-pressed-book-with-a-purple-label-my-thoughts/#comments 

    It's good to know that they're catching it some of the time—although I suspect that it's often missed.

    Have you heard anything to suggest that CGC can detect light-only lightening? I don't know of any way that they could do that.

  2. On 3/20/2024 at 9:24 PM, buttock said:

    CGC is absolutely treating this as restoration with a PLOD.  It's not always detected, but when it is it gets a purple label.  

    Using blue light with peroxide may be considered restoration in theory, but as I understand it, it's only detectable if someone messes up and blisters the paper—so there are presumably many, many blue-label books out there that have had this treatment.

    Blue light is also being used without peroxide, i.e., blue light only. I don't believe that that is detectable at all. If it's used on non-white areas, it will cause fading, but CGC can't detect fading, anyway (unless it's severe). I don't think that CGC has ever claimed to be able to detect light-only whitening.

  3. On 3/20/2024 at 1:27 PM, EastEnd1 said:

    I thought CGC was treating this technique with PLODs.  There were a number of vidoes that were posted about it maybe summer of last year?

    No, that treatment will not result in a PLOD. I don't even think CGC can detect it.

  4. The latest technique is using blue light to lighten comic book covers, especially the white parts of the covers. (I have no idea whether that was done to this comic.)

    CGC isn't treating it as restoration, probably because they don't have a way to detect it.

    Here's one video on it:

     

  5. On 3/17/2024 at 8:55 PM, batman_fan said:

    A few I was watching/bidding on.  Made someone pay a lot more for one of them.

    Screenshot 2024-03-17 at 6.51.42 PM.png

    Those were all very strong results, but this one is especially shocking. When I looked at it, my first thought was, "They gave a 6.0 to a book with that big of a stain?" Sure enough, it used to be a 4.5.

    I wonder how many of these books went to people who knew Jon personally and wanted to own the books for that reason. It's hard to understand those prices otherwise.

    Wonderworld27.JPG

  6. On 3/17/2024 at 7:14 PM, lou_fine said:

    Did you win this one here as it went for the bargain basement pittance of a price of just a tad over $12K with the 15% BP juice tossed in there?

    I was not a bidder (except for maybe a $1 or $5 tracking bid). It went far beyond my initial guess. In an auction like this one, with many of Jon's personal friends bidding, etc., it was able to command a very strong price, but I think that the pool of prospective buyers would likely be small on any given day. I'm too risk averse to ever buy something like that unless it were to stay really cheap—but it's a treat just to see one that nice.

    (I wonder if a boardie bought it! I'd love to see it cracked out.)

  7. On 3/17/2024 at 4:55 PM, lou_fine said:

    [L]ooks like the action and bids have really picked up on the comic book lots, especially for the late Jon Berk copies at least.

    This is one that I'm watching. It's not exactly in my wheelhouse, but I'm curious to see what it'll sell for. For people interested in the history of the hobby, it's an important proto-comic, and you don't see copies pop up every day.

    Wow2.JPG

  8. On 3/10/2024 at 3:18 PM, OtherEric said:

    Fair enough; although I don't think Bob Bolling did either.  I could be wrong on that point, I frequently am.

    According to his Wikipedia page, Bolling started freelancing for Archie Comics in '54. If that's true, then he just barely squeaks in as a pre-code artist. Since it's Wikipedia, it may or may not be true.