• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

theCapraAegagrus

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    28,429

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by theCapraAegagrus

  1. theCapraAegagrus
    I'm no expert, but I think it will be fine.
  2. theCapraAegagrus
    Yeah... No. TOS39 and Iron Man #1 in CGC are 33% more expensive than in CBCS. As are all "keys". Any Modern that I've ever wanted is always cheaper in a CBCS case. It's not a matter of "belief".
  3. theCapraAegagrus
    I'm not saying that they're "not helpful", but they're of the past. "Too high" for you may be the current market value, if people are willing to pay twice the price, though. That's all. You can't expect comic prices to stagnate. Sometimes they'll double with supply and demand.
  4. theCapraAegagrus
    WTTB, Ashton.
  5. theCapraAegagrus
    No thanks.
  6. theCapraAegagrus
    Projecting much? Here's a safe way to peruse and contribute to a forum: Infer positive tones rather than negative ones. You asked me questions - I answered them. Have conversations in good faith and you won't infer "aggression". Saying "conversation over" does not actually end the conversation, either. Trying to be an authority doesn't really work when you have no authority. FTR: These are all matter-of-fact statements with no emotions invested or implied.
  7. theCapraAegagrus
    What...? You responded to my reply and I replied to that. Your confrontation is unnecessary - and surprise! - won't be welcomed by many (if any). Are you asking questions without expecting answers, or what...?
  8. theCapraAegagrus
    Quite possibly this one:
  9. theCapraAegagrus
    Almost everyone that I know goes to comic cons without buying anything. As blob says - it's an experience. There's nothing wrong with that, though.
  10. theCapraAegagrus
    Her personality is like a 3, though, so she's an all-around 5. Well within your league.
  11. theCapraAegagrus
    Yes.* *Despite the fact that digital suxxx.
  12. theCapraAegagrus
    I think you mean: 9.2 ± 0.2
  13. theCapraAegagrus
    "Movie critics" are not "experts". They're paid to share opinions. No idea what "expert opinion" on books you're referring to. I've even openly admitted that the movie critics opinions on comic book movies are almost always wrong. They're criticizing based on empty slates - rather than considering source material. So their opinion is almost entirely moot.
  14. theCapraAegagrus
    Hockey Ultimate Team - game mode in NHL 20.
  15. theCapraAegagrus
    That's a poor umption. Grading is subjective. So, you may see an old SA book graded 9.4 that you think is a 7.0, but I'm guessing that most of us will agree with the "experts".
  16. theCapraAegagrus
    Sometimes a comic may receive things like "Golden Age Bump", but there will never be such a discrepancy as you've alleged (9.4 vs 7.0).
  17. theCapraAegagrus
    I've gotta play less HUT on the weekends... I have read 0 so far...
  18. theCapraAegagrus
    Last time I checked - CGC does like profitability.
  19. theCapraAegagrus
    "CGC" is a business incapable of original thought. The company employs many people. That's the dilemma with your question. Can you give me/us an example of how/why you would think that CGC is a "big fan" of Marvel?
  20. theCapraAegagrus
    Walking Dead I guess?
  21. theCapraAegagrus
    This story is one of the best things to happen in Comics General in a while.
  22. theCapraAegagrus
    7.0 IMO.
  23. theCapraAegagrus
    3.5 IMO.
  24. theCapraAegagrus
    4.5 IMO.
  25. theCapraAegagrus
    6.5 IMO.