• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

William-James88

Member
  • Posts

    4,693
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by William-James88

  1. On 1/7/2020 at 3:25 PM, The Lions Den said:

    Interesting response!

    But please check out this book currently listed on eBay: Sub-Mariner #7 CGC 5.5. It's not Qualified, and judging by the lower case printing notation on the label, it wasn't meant to be anything other than a Universal blue label. 

     

    CGC just got back to me about this. The notation does not distinguish the difference between a centrefold which was never attached (so mistake at manufacturing) and a centrefold which was once detached and now detached. So both scenarios would give the same notation of "detached centrefold". However, the grade for each scenario is very different. A loose centrefold can still get a decent grade. Overstreet says you can get up to 6.0 and CGC might give it more if the book looks much better than a 6.0 (since the defect is not due to wear). 

    So that means that unless we have grader notes, we can't really compare how much a "centrefold detached" notion takes away from a grades based on the slabs alone.

  2.  

    2 hours ago, Callaway29 said:

    hm some might say that’s an opportunity 

    For qualified books due to a signature, sure, but not for the ones with a defect. A 9.0 with major defect can never be worth as much as a 9.0 without the defect, so its not like your getting a deal by paying less for a qualified book. The green label is just so that you can have a higher number on the slab that reflects what the book looks like in a slab rather than have the actual grade incorporating the defect. And the market will treat it as such, so its basically ceteris paribus.

     

    2 hours ago, BlowUpTheMoon said:

    There's always the option to resubmit the book and ask for a blue label.  May work out for you depending on the reason for the green label. 

    From what I gather, the person has already lost money due to having spent more for the book than what it will be assessed to be worth. They then spent more money getting it graded a first time. I would suggest cutting one's losses here instead of spending more money to get a blue label, since the person attested to this being a rather low grade book to begin with.

  3.  

    10 hours ago, Tessio68 said:

    I hear ya. It's the chance you take when getting something graded. It's one opinion vs. another.

    What are the opposing opinions in this case? Are you suggesting CGC is mistaken about the stain? Their legitimacy as a business (and your repeat business) depends on it being there.

  4. 1 hour ago, lou_fine said:

    Well, since we are talking about investment and your love for Iron Man, had your income increased to the level that you was the lucky winner of this book here:  :screwy:

    iro1.5897a.jpg

    https://www.comicconnect.com/item/689571

    Looking back now a few years later on this auction result of $15K for this relatively common book (other than grade), I believe the consignor made out a lot better than the eventual winner of this copy here.  hm  :tonofbricks:

    But it's the only 9.8 in the UNIVERSE!

  5. 46 minutes ago, catman76 said:

    How many copies per issue? I would think Walt Disney's Comics and Stories would hold that record since it was selling over 2 or 3 million copies a month for a couple decades. The Uncle Scrooge and Donald Duck titles too were selling over a million a month for many years.

    Right right, I was only thinking of Superhero comics. And the estimated copies per issue were upwards of 2 million. Makes sense, comics predate television for a scheduled medium of entertainment for kids.

    Anyways, now that I think of it, Captain Marvel Adventures had probably more copies per issue than anything we mentionned since Fawcett would brand it with the notion of "largest circulation of any comic magazine" (check the top right corner). 

    2550197%5D&call=url%5Bfile:product.chain

     

     

  6. 4 hours ago, RonS2112 said:

    Yes, thank you.  This is the exact scenario I think I'm looking at.  Except I bought the book "un-slabbed" and despite posting pictures of the exterior and interior on eBay, the seller had nothing in either the photos or the write-up to indicate anything missing.  I didn't notice any issue on looking through the book, which indicates to me that a page has likely been neatly removed.

    The seller most probably didn't notice anything either.

    Please post a pic of the slab when you get it back.

  7. 12 minutes ago, theCapraAegagrus said:

    I haven't ever really looked at Q labels that exist to expound on a "large defect". That's new to me.

    Those tend to sell for a lot less. Here is an example with Amazing Spider-man 13 (picked at random). A 6.0 in 2016 would go for $417 and it's a key book, so a slabbed book of that would have no problem fetching that price. But it sold for $155, only 37% of it's guide price. 

    https://comics.ha.com/itm/silver-age-1956-1969-/the-amazing-spider-man-13-marvel-1964-cgc-qualified-fn-60-white-pages/a/121715-12182.s?ic4=GalleryView-Thumbnail-071515

    So that's what the person means by Green Slab of Death. If it's not because of a signature, then that green slab indicates that there is something really wrong with your book and it becomes near worthless by comparison. So, extrapolating that, a Fantastic Four 52 with a green label, which would fetch around 350 if it were blue, will instead be more in the ballpark of $100 (assuming it comes back as a 3.5 green label). 

    amazing spidey.jpg

  8. 19 minutes ago, Deadpoolica said:

    5.0

     

    4 hours ago, theCapraAegagrus said:

    5.5ish IMO.

    Thanks! If I were to get this pressed, it would fix the spine roll and creases, making the staple tears the biggest defect. Would the grade increase at all or do staple tears reduce it to these same grades regardless?

  9. 2 hours ago, theCapraAegagrus said:

    I've seen in-demand comics go for close to their universal counterparts.

    I'm not an expert on Qualified books, though. That's just my experience looking at some stuff.

    On my end, I can only talk about golden age, which I look at closely. And It does depends. I was only referring to Qualified books where they are qualified due to a defect detracting from an otherwise nice grade, which is the issue the original post was about. They usually sell for less. But yeah, there are cases where the green is used just for an unverified signature and those are the same, if not more like in the case of some Michael Turner signatures I saw.

  10. 26 minutes ago, Tessio68 said:

    According to the grader note  "stain right center of front cover"  

     

    That will do it. It's something I had an argument here on the boards with someone saying that the severity of the defect plays a part. It does, but only in making the grade lower, not higher. A small defect (like in this case) is still a defect and CGC will deduct accordingly. It sucks but that's how CGC goes.

    And I do see the stain. it's the darker patch next to Steve Austin's face at the right. It's a bit camouflaged by the inkwash effect on the yellow cover, but you don't see that type of shade anywhere else on the comic. Oh man, that means the case itself is worth more than the comic, that sucks hard.

  11. On 1/17/2020 at 10:37 AM, comicginger1789 said:

    Yeah ASM #129 has always been a valuable book because people have loved the character since his inception. Personally, I find it weirder to see Moon Knight spiking in popularity because he was never wildly popular but now you see first and early appearances that are very expensive (back in the early 2000s, his solo app in Marvel Spotlight was maybe a $5-10 book). 

     

    With Moon Knight, it's speculation. We are seeing the same thing with Shang Chi. Since previous books went up in demand for people to resell due to movies in the recent past (both FF 52 and Aquaman 29 come to mind), the fact that there is buzz surrounding him means people want to get that book in case it goes up. And since everyone wants it at the same time, the price goes up. But I don't think that has to do with them liking the character more now than they did before. It's just speculation on their behalf. Things can quiet down later as it did for Daredevil 168, Preacher 1 and Marvel Premier 15. 

     

    TO answer the original question in this thread, ASM 129 was always key, it's the first appearance of a popular Marvel hero. Plus, the spider-man title is the most collected title in terms of people completing the whole run, so you get a demand on two fronts.

  12. 3 hours ago, Krismusic said:

    interesting book there seeing this GA books makes me want to be a GA collector and get some archie's, romance, horror EC books.... maybe if I win the lottery I can become a GA collector at this point in my life.... :tonofbricks:

    Collecting midgrade GA can be cheaper these days than collecting midgrade early silver age Marvel books. Depends on the books of course.