MCMiles

I'll have theses available sometime this weekend with scans and prices and offered here on the boards first. Tales of Suspense 71 Universal 9.6 OFF-WHITE TO WHITE Tales of Suspense 97 Universal 9.6 WHITE Tales of Suspense 97 Universal 9.4 WHITE ( x2 ) Iron Man and Sub-Mariner 1 Universal 8.0 WHITE Tomb of Dracula 1 Universal 9.4 WHITE X-Men 45 Universal 9.2 OFF-WHITE TO WHITE Amazing Spider-Man 64 Universal 9.8 WHITE Captain America 117 Universal 9.0 WHITE Captain America 100 Universal 7.5 OFF-WHITE Sugar and Spike 80 12/68-1/69 Universal 9.6 OFF-WHITE TO WHITE Daredevil 13 Universal 8.5 OFF-WHITE TO WHITE X-Men 100 Universal 9.8 WHITE

It appears as though the OP may not even know all of this discussion went on in the thread.

You were probably just being snarky. Oh, sorry about the jinx smackdown I put on the horns last night. I think you just moved to the front of the Bedrock groin punch line.

off. Is that considered contributing in a positive manner? If so, off and yo' mama can off too.

I love the CGC boards. People are awesome.

Well, this obviously gets a thumbs up from me. Three Exciting #9s.

, but true.

Two threads are fine IMO.

(thumbs u

That particular issue is considered scarce. The 75 cent price variant for that same issue is considered rare. Here's a link to Doug Sulipa's website listing those issue which are rare, scarce and uncommon: Doug Sulipa's Whitman Comics Page Thanks for the links. It will be helpfull. I bought a collection that has about 50 or Whitmans from the same time frame. It has most of the later (60 cent) pre pack issues, but none of the earlier rare issues.

It might be under Walt Disney's Peter Pan or something like that? I know the Cinderella issue I bought for my daughter had a weird name like that. Yeah, I checked all of those posibilities.

Anyone have this one? I can't find a listing for it in the Overstreet.

They might all be pressed - might not. I suppose only the seller and a potential customer that wants to ask will know. You are neither of those, and your post in the sales thread was not a legitimate question. It was an azz backward or chikin way of posting what you finally posted above. You wanted to tell everyone that they are all pressed and being sold without disclosure. Neither of which you have any proof of. Assume that , maybe, they all have been pressed. Even at that point, they are only being listed without pro-active disclosure. That doesn't mean proactive disclosure isn't taking place before any sales are finalized. It definitely does't mean that disclosure doesn't take place if a buyer pro-actively shows concern. (takes responsibility for themselves and asks). It was intended to be thread crappping, and uncalled for. Even monstro's pissant attempt at being the grammar police was nothing more then thread crappping. He doesn't like pressing so he thought he found a reason to belittle someone he doesn't like because they don't share his view on pressing. If you feel like you really need to be the board watchdog over pressing, then take it to PM, and stay out of the threads. Absolutely not true. I'm beginning to think sellers of pressed books are paranoid. Again, you don't even know if the books are pressed or not. It would be more correct to say people that aren't against pressing. My apologies if that is not true. I guess your goal was to prove Abraham Lincoln correct.

They might all be pressed - might not. I suppose only the seller and a potential customer that wants to ask will know. You are neither of those, and your post in the sales thread was not a legitimate question. It was an azz backward or chikin way of posting what you finally posted above. You wanted to tell everyone that they are all pressed and being sold without disclosure. Neither of which you have any proof of. Assume that , maybe, they all have been pressed. Even at that point, they are only being listed without pro-active disclosure. That doesn't mean proactive disclosure isn't taking place before any sales are finalized. It definitely does't mean that disclosure doesn't take place if a buyer pro-actively shows concern. (takes responsibility for themselves and asks). It was intended to be thread crappping, and uncalled for. Even monstro's pissant attempt at being the grammar police was nothing more then thread crappping. He doesn't like pressing so he thought he found a reason to belittle someone he doesn't like because they don't share his view on pressing. If you feel like you really need to be the board watchdog over pressing, then take it to PM, and stay out of the threads.

Thanks Nick. Always a pleasure.

One of my favorites. You sure have been turning up some nice books Steve.

That's fruity, even for me. That was posted specifically for you! Got the rest of the run? I had never heard of the darn thing before. It showed up in a large collection. You want it? Depends if I have to pay for it.

I've actually had these back a while, but just got around to scanning them.

Some quality members in '06 - all downhill from there.

2002 FlyingDonut, gman, ArAich, greggy, fingfangfoom, Chromium 2003 Scrooge, Earl 2004 xsmanx, JordanScott, Stronguy, namisgr,Currin Comics 2005 kingofrulers, Crows, Cryptkeeper59 2006 joeypost, nepatkm, lookwhoitis, MCMiles 2007 BlowUpTheMoon, MacMan, Count, blue808, Mr. Diggler, trmoore54, cheetah, bosco685 2008 Comicopolis, Boozad, Nmtg9,Dollarbill, PEP, Black Lantern 2009 slym2none, ashsaytr