• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

DrWatson

Member
  • Posts

    40,086
  • Joined

Everything posted by DrWatson

  1. So you agree with donut that the majority of young women are fixated on their appearance, but you just don't want men to point it out. Understood. is that a question? would it be safe to say that women should assume that majority of men are insecure about their p.e.n.i.s size becuase of what is seen in po.rn? or is that a horse of a different color? enlighten me...please You shouldn't have mentioned horses.
  2. These discussions are silly because we all instinctually hide our insecurities, and some people can hide them really well. I have dated some women that I thought were beautiful and extremely confident, only to find out about some seriously deep rooted insecurities much later in the relationship. To assume that people are secure because they don't openly display their insecurities is ludicrous, because as I said, our instinct is to hide them at all costs. To me, at least in this society, common sense dictates that the majority of women, particularly younger women, are fixated on their appearance, as evidenced by the plethora of fashion mags, the fact that plastic surgeons own Yachts, the fact that women spend in the 5 figures on makeup annually, and the fact that the fashion industry is largely catered to women. Would you kindly explain to me why you insist on going on about this? You are not a woman, nor will you ever be. Therefore, how can you know how all or majority of women feel? Because you have seen what society can do to women you know? I'm just a bit confused as to why you keep going on about this... Because he is a man who's in touch with his peter. Really, it is a mighty weapon. The peter is mightier than the sword. That's the pen is, Mr. Connery.
  3. These discussions are silly because we all instinctually hide our insecurities, and some people can hide them really well. I have dated some women that I thought were beautiful and extremely confident, only to find out about some seriously deep rooted insecurities much later in the relationship. To assume that people are secure because they don't openly display their insecurities is ludicrous, because as I said, our instinct is to hide them at all costs. To me, at least in this society, common sense dictates that the majority of women, particularly younger women, are fixated on their appearance, as evidenced by the plethora of fashion mags, the fact that plastic surgeons own Yachts, the fact that women spend in the 5 figures on makeup annually, and the fact that the fashion industry is largely catered to women. Would you kindly explain to me why you insist on going on about this? You are not a woman, nor will you ever be. Therefore, how can you know how all or majority of women feel? Because you have seen what society can do to women you know? I'm just a bit confused as to why you keep going on about this... Because he is a man who's in touch with his peter. Really, it is a mighty weapon.
  4. Sad but true in most cases. I can honestly say, not me. I put them on ignore and it stays that way.
  5. Who's not playing nice? I love Rick even when he's wrong. I have no malice toward him at all.
  6. Clever, my dear Watson, very clever. Am I alone in noticing the the last word in your post was "gullible", thus doubling the impact? I wasn't that clever, pov. that obvious huh I respect your friendly resolve and I'm well aware that it's there for me just like it would be there for you as well. However, if you believe that load of fertilizer, then you're still gullible, just not doubly so. my yard needs some fertilizer and turf builder, can I count on a visit from you and maybe some help spreading the cra.p around My dear sir, there is enough cr@p in this thread to fertilize the entire state of Florida.
  7. Clever, my dear Watson, very clever. Am I alone in noticing the the last word in your post was "gullible", thus doubling the impact? I wasn't that clever, pov. Clever, very clever my dear Watson. Am I alone in noticing the the last word in your post was "pov", thus doubling the sense of addressing me? I'm so glad you're back that I can not contain my joy.
  8. Clever, my dear Watson, very clever. Am I alone in noticing the the last word in your post was "gullible", thus doubling the impact? I wasn't that clever, pov. that obvious huh I respect your friendly resolve and I'm well aware that it's there for me just like it would be there for you as well. However, if you believe that load of fertilizer, then you're still gullible, just not doubly so.
  9. Clever, my dear Watson, very clever. Am I alone in noticing the the last word in your post was "gullible", thus doubling the impact? I wasn't that clever, pov.
  10. In this situation, I would say your last word on the subject is gullible. Right back atcha.
  11. In this situation, I would say your last word on the subject is gullible.
  12. How do you think I reacted to this? You lifted your skirt and got out of the way as suggested?
  13. Here's a summary for those who don't read 3rd grader: 1) You people have no life. 2) I have a life. 3) I'm known for my excellent customer service skills. 4) I sell a lot of comic books. 5) You people have no life. 6) I have a life. 7) I am human. 8) I got caught lying yesterday and I'm now desperately concocting another lie to cover up the first lie. 9) You people have no life. 10) You people are "derelict's". 11) Did I mention that I do have a life? You forgot: 12) I sold it to a customer from eBay. 13) I sold it at WonderCon. 14) I posted the wrong scan.
  14. The greatest griefs are those we cause ourselves. Female logic.
  15. Wow, I never knew one could mention the word "Frank" so many times in one post. I wonder if Vanna could sell you a pronoun? That's what I'm talking about! I ramped up the smartass just for you.
  16. Wow, I never knew one could mention the word "Frank" so many times in one post. I wonder if Vanna could sell you a pronoun?
  17. oh, I think it was resolved... Frank says the books are different, nothing wrong done, his closet board friends support him (although apparently privately, not publicly) 99% of the boards say the books are the same from the compelling visual evidence and frank has lost the trust of 99% of the board... pretty much sums it up Wrong! Not so fast, Gator!! One issue of vital importance remains unresolved. Why don't I ever receive the South Florida Posse newsletter? The SFP Herald Tribune used to arrive via London dispatch to my PO Box every other Wolf Moon, Hare Moon, Mead Moon, & Barley Moon. Now nothing & I wanna know why, damnit. Did you pay your union dues? Thats BS! I think they now have a discriminatory "Hair must be this ___ long to enter" policy. Shameful. Tupenny has no hair, so that can't be it.
  18. More deadpan. I prefer more smartass. Check out the gay Archie thread. (thumbs u The first part of the thread where it was fun with me and the_black_hand, not the crappy part that comes after that.