• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Albert Thurgood

Member
  • Posts

    853
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Albert Thurgood

  1. The OP asked about not closing flaps. There was some discussion a couple of months ago with some people saying to leave them open to allow ventilation from outgassed byproducts of oxidation. (We know that happens - you can see it from the yellowing of bags in long-term storage). But what do most here think about leaving the flaps open? Think of the savings on tape if nothing else ;-)
  2. Commiserations! That has happened to me, too. It was with a different auction house and with a book that I needed but is not of much interest to anyone else. I got sniped with literally 2 seconds to go. I wonder if it was a real snipe or a safeguard that a book does not sell for too low a price.
  3. You would think with all that money at stake, they would have better auction management software.
  4. Yes, I updated as recently as 3 minutes before the end. It is taken off now as it is no longer live. It is weird that the price didn't update for me. Maybe they knew I was not a chance to bid!
  5. Huh? It showed as $470k on my page with time counted down to zero. Anyway, that is good - I was wondering it would top the half million.
  6. AF#15 CGC 9.0 just sold in the C Link auction for $470,000! Just a bit outside my price range...
  7. The cover still has good eye appeal and a press will get rid of those wrinkles, maybe taking it to 3.5
  8. My thoughts were 6 without the staple pull, which we learnt from another one of your posts is worth a 1 point downgrade. So 5 it is. Thanks for posting!
  9. I agree with everyone else here. Looked way better than a 3. Seems that your "lucky" run with CGC fizzled out with this one! :-)
  10. You are having a great run with CGC. I thought that would be a 6... Congrats!
  11. A 5 for that is a good call - looks like they did not penalize the "10" in marker pen too much.
  12. I didn't see this first time around. I would have said 7 without the staple pull, so on my scale at least that was worth taking off a whole point.
  13. Could you provide a link to the best ie most trustworthy one(s) please?
  14. yes, it is too bad that the front cover got all the bad treatment while the BC emerged so nicely. I am a front cover guy (not interested in admiring ads on BCs) so 2.5 IMHO
  15. There's also that issue of Not Brand Echh where he is shown being thawed out of the iceberg. ;-)
  16. That's the worst tanning I have seen, but think it could be a 6... maybe 5.5 for the severity of tanning.