another batman #1 ebay that loks too goos to be true

[nmtg9]

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/BATMAN-1-COMIC-SPRING-1941-ORIGINAL-COMIC_W0QQitemZ250306518770QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item250306518770&_trkparms=39%3A1%7C66%3A2%7C65%3A3%7C240%3A1318&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14

 

THERE IS NO WRITTING ON ANY PART OF THE

 

COMIC

 

 

NOT IN A SHABBY CONDITION

 

unlike his spelling

[Count]

Seems to be a consignment :shrug:

[Duffman_Comics]

"loks too goos"

 

Dimensions as stated are OK, but the No PayPal means a major Red Flag. It just doesn't take that long to get verified (took minutes in my case) so why not hold off on selling a big book like this until it happens?

 

Hasn't sold anything for more than 90 days, so it's impossible to check what the seller has been dealing in, with the exception of a neg for (alleged) fake autographs. This was Sept 07 and doesn't show in his feedback statistic.

 

Only other lots up at the moment are signed footballs and a Ryder Cup Autograph book. Didn't Danny D. get his start in collectibles in the sports autograph business?

 

Spelling? Oh yeah, there's another warning. Deceased Estate? At least it is a variation on the "Grandpa's Attic" theme.

 

If I was in the UK, and wanted this book I'd certainly be looking at a personal pickup. Otherwise I wouldn't touch it.

 

My 12c

[evilsly]

if anyone can get an address out of the seller more specific than just 'north england'

 

I'd be happy to check the book out if anyone was likely to be interested in it

 

 

 

[Forsythe P Jones]

Looks like a Famous First Edition.

 

[Pitboss]

"loks too goos"

[greggy]

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/BATMAN-1-COMIC-SPRING-1941-ORIGINAL-COMIC_W0QQitemZ250306518770QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item250306518770&_trkparms=39%3A1%7C66%3A2%7C65%3A3%7C240%3A1318&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14

 

THERE IS NO WRITTING ON ANY PART OF THE

 

COMIC

 

 

NOT IN A SHABBY CONDITION

 

unlike his spelling

I wouldn't talk about spelling after looking at your subject title.

[PokerKid]

Looks like a Famous First Edition.

 

 

Famous Firsts don't have the red buildings on the left.

[Lebowski]

Looks like a Famous First Edition.

 

 

Famous Firsts don't have the red buildings on the left.

 

Actually, I think you're referring to the Millenium edition. The Famous First edition does indeed have the red building ledge silhouette to the left. In the Milennium edition, it is (for the most part) cut out.

[nearmint]

I think that copy has had extensive resto, and was a total rag prior to that. Pretty sure detective27kid warned me off of the copy some time back.

[greggy]

Looks like a Famous First Edition.

 

 

Famous Firsts don't have the red buildings on the left.

 

Actually, I think you're referring to the Millenium edition. The Famous First edition does indeed have the red building ledge silhouette to the left. In the Milennium edition, it is (for the most part) cut out.

Despite this, it's not a FFE, as I checked my copy.

[Lebowski]

Also, outside of the "no Paypal" thing, it's a pretty tempting auction...not that I have the scratch for it. Hopefully, someone across the pond can go check out the book and let us know the deal.

[djpinkpanther67]

Looks like a Famous First Edition.

 

 

Famous Firsts don't have the red buildings on the left.

 

Actually, I think you're referring to the Millenium edition. The Famous First edition does indeed have the red building ledge silhouette to the left. In the Milennium edition, it is (for the most part) cut out.

Despite this, it's not a FFE, as I checked my copy.

[ArAich]

Could be just me ...but it looks like extensive color touch on the cover...

 

oh...and it does lok too goos to be true...

[greggy]

Could be just me ...but it looks like extensive color touch on the cover...

 

oh...and it does lok too goos to be true...

[ArAich]

[thirdgreenham]

My momma always told me "if it loks too goos to be true, chances are it is".

[Kenglo1]

Darn--the listing has been removed

[Lebowski]

Hmmm...peculiar. Certainly reinforces any suspicions people had.

[szelim]

Probably pulled because of a listing violation: said no paypal in description despite showing paypal accepted as an option.