TheLiamSturgess Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 It's crazy, but they must have a scenario in their grand plan that accounts for the return of the FF properties. Silver Surfer, Galactus and even just Richards could all make leaps and bounds in moving the MCU forward beyond the Infinity War. It just seems so empty without them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miscellaneous Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 After seeing all these reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, I'm not sure if I even want to spend the money to see it on a Saturday now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantastic_four Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 What reason do these reviewers even have to not break review embargoes? Clearly some of them could care less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VintageComics Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 It's highly possible that the ones breaking the embargo are doing so because they want word to get out. So is it considered negative if I call the movie a stinker now that people have seen it and agree? I swear, I could just tell from early on that it wasn't going to be good. Call it my special talent. I'm pretty decent at telling apart a good movie from a bad one with just a little info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spideyfan68 Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 I want it to fail, because I want to see this : I remember buying this one on the newsstand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Point Five Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 Came to this thread for the scathing reviews. Stayed for the memes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broke as a Joke Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 Come on now...we all knew this was going to suck right? I mean, if it was acclaimed I would have been shocked, not the other way around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLiamSturgess Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 The guy's name is Trank. Not Trask. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisInBaltimore Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 Yea I didn't think it was Trask... Clearly people just associated Trank with a super villain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monsterbento Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr 9.8 Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 I didn't know Nick was Robin!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr 9.8 Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 (edited) Think about this, if not for the sympathy of one reviewer this would be %0. BTW It's now %17 percent. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/fantastic_four_2015/ Edited August 5, 2015 by Mr 9.8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadOne Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 I want it to fail, because I want to see this : I'm going to steal this and send to my brothers. (thumbs u Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 Think about this, if not for the sympathy of one reviewer this would be %0. BTW It's know %17 percent. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/fantastic_four_2015/ I knew this was probably goona suck way back on page one, but when I saw they made the Thing a nudist I knew for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monsterbento Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 Think about this, if not for the sympathy of one reviewer this would be %0. BTW It's know %17 percent. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/fantastic_four_2015/ It's 0% with top critics right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjrjr Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 I liked AoU but felt that there was a lot missing (much of which is fixed in the Directors Cut) Come on I always see Marvel movies like a week before release You know that. Wanted to punch Miles Teller (spelling?) in the face the whole time. Michael B. Jordon I have to give a lot of credit to, he was really good. The girl who played Sue (Kate Mara?) was interesting. Played the roll more "motherly", which I felt was better than Alba's take. There is no director's cut for AOU. The director stated as much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HouseofComics.Com Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 3 movies, all out at the same time: Trainwreck, Antman, Fantastic Four One is titled "Trainwreck", One has a giant trainwreck in it, and one is going to be a giant trainwreck. I like it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zosocane Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 Think about this, if not for the sympathy of one reviewer this would be %0. BTW It's now %17 14 percent. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/fantastic_four_2015/ Updated it for you. FF 2015 is now well, well below Green Lantern's RT score of 26%, and is vying for the title of Worst Comic Book Film Ever Made. Thank you Mr. Trank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco685 Posted August 5, 2015 Author Share Posted August 5, 2015 The guy's name is Trank. Not Trask. Oh my! That made this morning thread visit so worth it. We all know who it really was behind the scenes. I didn't know Nick was Robin!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince Namor Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 It's highly possible that the ones breaking the embargo are doing so because they want word to get out. So is it considered negative if I call the movie a stinker now that people have seen it and agree? I swear, I could just tell from early on that it wasn't going to be good. Call it my special talent. I'm pretty decent at telling apart a good movie from a bad one with just a little info. Well there ARE some signs a movie is going to have problems, and when those signs all continue to add up for the same movie, it's almost a SURE bet that movie is going to be a dud. -bad reactions to early advertisements -slow at putting a trailer out showing the action -stories of director's drug use -stories of director's ego -stories of director being replaced behind the scenes -stories of the director being replaced on a future high profile movie -DENIAL of all of those things -pushing the release date forward -shooting additional footage after the wrap -unhappy advance buzz -changing the focus of the endless number of trailers -review embargo Commenting on these things, despite being called negative for doing so, was a burden some of us were willing to share with the CGC 'community', to try and warn them of the empending TURD that was getting ready to be dropped on their head. We weren't negative. We were right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
