• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Comics, Pulps, and Paperbacks: Why such a discrepancy in values?
25 25

7,343 posts in this topic

On 4/4/2024 at 8:35 PM, OtherEric said:

I don't have that one would be why.  But it's going on the list for sure...

Raymond Johnson's cover run at Avon in the early 1950's was astonishing.

Belarski at Popular was the only comparable dynasty, and I love his run, but Johnson broke everything out of the confines of the cover space with huge figures in off-set layouts with bright colors and that smooth shading 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/4/2024 at 8:48 PM, Surfing Alien said:

Raymond Johnson's cover run at Avon in the early 1950's was astonishing.

Belarski at Popular was the only comparable dynasty, and I love his run, but Johnson broke everything out of the confines of the cover space with huge figures in off-set layouts with bright colors and that smooth shading 

When I first started paperback collecting, there was Belarski and Not-Belarski

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/4/2024 at 8:54 PM, moonpool said:

When I first started paperback collecting, there was Belarski and Not-Belarski

Some would say Avati and not Avati back then hm 

But I always loved the slightly cartoonish renderings of the pulp influenced artists rather than the "gritty realists" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
25 25