• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

What the Heck Happened to this Superman #12?
2 2

25 posts in this topic

Now, that's just greedy.  Comic grading's version of Icarus flying too close to the sun.  If I ever had a book that costly and with that high a grade, I doubt I'd have it touched.  That being said, this person did almost make most of his money back, I guess... almost.

That being said, I was looking at the grader notes on them and noticed the 8.5 reincarnation got knocked for spine and staple issues that I don't believe the 9.2 did.  The 8.5 on the lower staple seems to show issues that the 9.2 doesn't, but it's hard to tell for sure.  I'm wondering if the cleaning and possible pressing caused those issues or not.

Flippin' ain't easy. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think the book “looks better” as the YouTuber implies. Sure the slight shadow is gone, but the colors on the cover are considerably faded from the 9.2 to 8.5, most especially in the Superman logo. I don’t blame someone for taking a shot like they did though. I mean sometimes you take a shot, just didn’t pan out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/16/2023 at 7:47 PM, Dr. Love said:

Could be anybody, Jeff, but my first thought was Ritter.  He has been known to buy big grade books, do his thing, and roll the dice on a submit.  Ask him when you see him next. If he hesitates, bingo!

I'm less interested in the who than the how.  I've always been under the impression that eliminating a dust shadow required a wet cleaning.  If that's the case, how did CGC miss it?  Or is there a new method I haven't heard about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/16/2023 at 7:23 PM, nearmint said:

I suspect the color variation is just scanner settings.  

I was thinking that at first, but I don’t know. That looks considerably faded to be a scanner thing. I mean definitely possible, but if that’s the case auction house took a horrible photo lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/16/2023 at 10:04 PM, nearmint said:

I'm less interested in the who than the how.  I've always been under the impression that eliminating a dust shadow required a wet cleaning.  If that's the case, how did CGC miss it?  Or is there a new method I haven't heard about?

I've seen instances where dust shadows were removed from books and still come back with a blue label - there's a video of a modern comic originally graded as a 9.6 with a dust shadow on it which gets removed using water (or maybe peroxide) and the blue light treatment, pressed, and then sent off to get re-graded.  It comes back with a 9.8 blue label.  I've also seen/read several people claim the process to remove dirt/dust shadows can cause the purple label.  It may be a situation of, if they catch it, they'll bust you for it.  How they catch it, I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/17/2023 at 11:18 AM, Telegan said:

That being said, I was looking at the grader notes on them and noticed the 8.5 reincarnation got knocked for spine and staple issues that I don't believe the 9.2 did.  The 8.5 on the lower staple seems to show issues that the 9.2 doesn't, but it's hard to tell for sure.  I'm wondering if the cleaning and possible pressing caused those issues or not.

For reference

9.2: light cover tanning, light shadow full right of front cover, very light crease right bottom of front cover

8.5: crease right bottom of front cover, tanning interior cover, small spine stress lines, very light staple tears

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/16/2023 at 9:04 PM, nearmint said:

I'm less interested in the who than the how.  I've always been under the impression that eliminating a dust shadow required a wet cleaning.  If that's the case, how did CGC miss it?  Or is there a new method I haven't heard about?

There is a fairly large cadre of people out there experimenting with stain removal.  There's even a book you can get.  From what I understand it doesn't work nearly as well on older books (especially big GA books), so if someone was trying it on a book like this you could see how you might end up worse off.  But if you're buying bronze/copper stuff...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/17/2023 at 8:34 AM, october said:

Cover whitening with peroxide baths is also a thing. 

There's a reason I am more comfortable buying raw books at this point. If they are manipulated, at least I can reliably spot it. Too many squashed spines and other unfortunate stuff hiding behind slab plastic. 

Peroxide, distilled water, or blue LED. There are at least 2 proprietary cleaning mixes also. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/17/2023 at 7:39 AM, october said:

Last time I saw him at a show, he had a raw Prize I'd been after marked a 5.5. Took about five seconds on my phone to find the significantly lower grade slab he had cracked it out of. 

Not someone I feel at all comfortable buying from. 

That's really disappointing to hear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/17/2023 at 10:43 AM, nearmint said:

These are procedures that if caught by CGC, would result in a purple label, correct?  

Not really.  The telltale signs of a cleaning aren't typically seen.  Most people are getting blue labels.  Some people are taking it too far and ending up with purple labels, but those are pretty egregious examples where the books don't look natural.  It's not an aqueous/solvent bath like cleaning has been historically.  You'd be really surprised by what people are doing.  That being said, it's out there in the wide open for anyone to find or see.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/17/2023 at 9:49 AM, buttock said:

Not really.  The telltale signs of a cleaning aren't typically seen.  Most people are getting blue labels.  Some people are taking it too far and ending up with purple labels, but those are pretty egregious examples where the books don't look natural.  It's not an aqueous/solvent bath like cleaning has been historically.  You'd be really surprised by what people are doing.  That being said, it's out there in the wide open for anyone to find or see.  

I haven't kept up on all this.  I need to educate myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
2 2