• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

ASM #252 CGC 9.8 Record Sale - something fishy going on? - Holder Tampering Incident confirmed by CGC
50 50

9,028 posts in this topic

On 12/26/2023 at 2:26 PM, Paul III said:

Might have already been posted, but finally a reply from CS. As expected, but they are definitely aware.

 

Thank you for contacting us. I would like to confirm for you we are currently going through a full investigation into this situation. At this time we do not have more information regarding this. Rest assured once we have more information we can share we will let our customers know. I am sorry we currently do not have a timeline for when we will be able to offer more insight. Thank you for your understanding. 
 
I would also just like to personally thank you for reaching out to us via email. While the original post on our boards (now over 130 pages since it was posted this month) was a huge benefit to bringing this to our attention, we truly appreciate you and so many others contacting us directly via email regarding this. If you have any other questions, please let us know. Thank you!

Just want to clarify, and perhaps this is stated elsewhere and I missed it.  Who is "CS"?  You indicate receiving a reply from CS, who is that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2023 at 5:17 PM, agamoto said:

I did, yeah... Let me find the post.

As mentioned earlier, this is only including the sales he's had on eBay. He may very well have sold other copies on other venues he's confirmed to have his books moved, ie. comiclink, insta, consignment via facebook, possibly shortboxed, etc.

 

Keep in mind that he may not have tried to sell the books on Comiclink at all or anywhere else at all.  Those sales and attempted sales may be from people looking to unload something they bought.  We saw that with the Promise Collection how some books purchased through Heritage wound up on Comiclink months later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2023 at 6:06 PM, silent06 said:

Based on what I have read in this thread and understand so far regarding the fraud and deception that are being used to execute this scam, my concern is that the ASM 238s I purchased are possibly either green label qualified books that do not contain the tattoos or have had the tattoos married to the book to create the ASM 238 Newsstands containing the tattoos, Not sure sure if the books used are truly 9.8s of some variation of the books I just mentioned as after he creates them and sends it to CGC the scans of his created 9.8 are what show up on CGC site when you query the certification number on the CGC cert verification website

It's doubtful he is marrying books as he would need to crack open the inner well and get it regraded rather than reholdered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2023 at 4:21 PM, MatterEaterLad said:

I'm not talking about a Blue book being switched with lesser quality Blue book. This Hulk 181 was originally given a Green label, then regraded to Blue, in one working day. You could argue this was a mistake, but that same mistake has happened with 5 other Hulk 181s all sold by the same person. The switch of either the book or the label happened at CGC.

I think what people are saying is that the actual 2/23/2023 grading date of the qualified book is correct. This book was graded by CGC on that date, no questions asked. However, an unrestored copy of Hulk #181 was graded 2/26/2023, but it could be a completely different book inside the case. Once the scammer bought this book (or perhaps he was the original submitter) let's say in mid March. He then did the whole switcheroo, submitted the book back to CGC in late March, but because it was a straight reholder, it kept the original grading date of 2/26, but with a different book in the case.

Edited by skybolt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2023 at 5:28 PM, skybolt said:

I think what people are saying is that the actual 2/26/2023 grading date of the qualified book is correct. This book was graded by CGC on that date, no questions asked. However, an unrestored copy of Hulk #181 was graded 2/26/2023, but it could be a completely different book inside the case. Once the scammer bought this book (or perhaps he was the original submitter) let's say in mid March. He then did the whole switcheroo, submitted the book back to CGC in late March, but because it was a straight reholder, it kept the original grading date of 2/26, but with a different book in the case.

If I were going to try and pull off something like this, I would want to control both the original and donor(s) to maximize cash flow.

-bc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2023 at 3:28 PM, skybolt said:

I think what people are saying is that the actual 2/23/2023 grading date of the qualified book is correct. This book was graded by CGC on that date, no questions asked. However, an unrestored copy of Hulk #181 was graded 2/26/2023, but it could be a completely different book inside the case. Once the scammer bought this book (or perhaps he was the original submitter) let's say in mid March. He then did the whole switcheroo, submitted the book back to CGC in late March, but because it was a straight reholder, it kept the original grading date of 2/26, but with a different book in the case.

I hear ya Sky, I do. I'm not talking about that book.

Read what comicwiz shared on page 126. 

A green book was originally graded on 2/24, then regraded with a blue label on 2/28 (over the weekend). It's the same green book, switched to a blue label, with a DIFFERENT cert#. 

This is making my head hurt. :frustrated:

Edited by MatterEaterLad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2023 at 4:35 PM, MatterEaterLad said:

I hear ya Sky, I do. I'm not talking about that book.

Read what comicwiz shared on page 126. 

A green book was originally graded on 2/24, then regraded with a blue label on 2/28 (over the weekend). It's the same green book, switched to a blue label, with a DIFFERENT cert#. 

This is making my head hurt. :frustrated:

My apologies for getting the dates wrong, but my comment stands. What I'm saying is the book graded on 2/28 is not the same book in the universal holder now. That one was a legitimate universal 6.5.  if the scammer switched this book with green label one and sent it in for reholdering a month later, the grading date would remain as 2/28, but with the green label book in there now. 

Edited by skybolt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2023 at 3:58 PM, skybolt said:

My apologies for getting the dates wrong, but my comment stands. What I'm saying is the book graded on 2/28 is not the same book in the universal holder now. That one was a legitimate universal 6.5.  if the scammer switched this book with green label one and sent it in for reholdering a month later, the grading date would remain as 2/28, but with the green label book in there now. 

Ahhh... I see what you're saying. I thought it was the same book. :facepalm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2023 at 4:21 PM, MatterEaterLad said:

I'm not talking about a Blue book being switched with a lesser quality Blue book. This Hulk 181 was originally given a Green label, then regraded to Blue, in one working day, so no time for it to be sent to the seller for the switch. You could argue this was a mistake, but that same mistake has happened with 5 other Hulk 181s all sold by the same person. The switch of either the book or the label happened at CGC.

The 7.0 qualified and 8.5 universal were both graded in February. The photos show the 7.0 qualified being paired with the 8.5 universal label. That pairing was done after the initial grading of each book. The scammer re-submitted the 7.0 qualified copy with the 8.5 universal label for a re-holder and/or label update after the initial grading in February. The book wasn't re-graded which is why the grade date remains unchanged from the February date. 

It is impossible logistically for a CGC employee to be running this scam, there are simply too many steps in CGC's process for one person to be playing overwatch during all of them and on specific shipments no less.

The submitter has figured out how to either swap books or swap labels on books while doing minimal damage to the case so that his re-submissions don't always trigger a re-grading by the person inspecting his submissions. Other than that he might be marrying qualified and/or restored copies to frankenstein into universal copies, but that's all this is.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2023 at 3:10 PM, sledgehammer said:

Did Joe already catch this one? I don't know, but it sold twice after heritage (2017),  in 2021.  @comicwiz

June 3rd $12,500

September 12th  $8,592.

Be interesting to see if the history can show when it changed.

This book doesn't appear to have crossed-over into my searches.

Edited by comicwiz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

On 12/25/2023 at 9:59 PM, Sam T said:

I'm actually pretty sure Occam would be on my side in this 🤣

 

What's simpler, a scam that involves sitting at your computer and generating fake data with fake accounts or a scam that involves the kind of trial and error, insider information and/or physical craftsmanship that would be required to come up with a method of swapping and resealing?

 

If a person generates an ebay account with fake information and fake/stolen payment information, they can simply rack up debt on an ebay account without it mattering. Also, I don't think I've been charged auction fees for auctions that buyers don't actually pay for. When an auction ends, it pops up in "sold listings" immediately. It does not require payment actually going through. The only version of this where the ebay scammer has to pay fees is the version where he's only willing to do one kind of scam. But the guy who does counterfeiting will also do identity theft. Internet crimes are easier and simpler than real world crimes. It's has to be easier to generate fake accounts on ebay than it is figure out the secrets to CGC's encapsulation process.

 

On 12/25/2023 at 10:34 PM, Lightning55 said:

And what is the supposed motivation to create this fake data, or fake eBay activity. I don't see a way to monetize it. 

Is it to create fake market data, influence prices? Quite involved for that, to drive up values on books you are holding.

 

On 12/26/2023 at 11:14 AM, Sam T said:

You can say it's "more involved" but any plan that ONLY involves online shenanigans is a whole lot easier than a plan that requires a sonic welder.

 

My point isn't actually trying to prove that it's "a fake auction scam" vs a "fake slab scam" my point is that we don't need the conspiracy theory about and inside man in their reholdering department to hold CGC accountable. If people can make their own slabs or swap and reseal with the finished product looking so good that CGC can't even tell, then the real problem is so much bigger than "a conspiracy to reholder". If slabs aren't tamper proof then graded books no longer deserve to carry a premium in the market. And when CGCing a book doesn't provide value to the customer, their business becomes unsustainable. When that happens, whoever they're getting their plastic from is just going to bring 'em to market and sell empties, further eroding the value of CGC'd books.

 

There are 3 possible problems that fit the facts I've seen:

1. Slabs are not tamper proof or people are counterfeiting slabs (sonic welders aren't that rare). They look so good that that even CGC can't tell they've been tampered with during their reholdering process.

2. A bunch of questionable, high value sales of bronze age mega-keys were faked on eBay.

3. A grader at CGC employee during the reholdering process is upgrading and removing listed defects from books that either he or an associate plan to sell on eBay.

 

I keep seeing people talking about CGC needing to fix their reholdering process but that's not where any of these problems are actually coming from. Problem #1 originates from their slabbing process. Problem #2 originates from eBays flawed user verification process. And the conspiracy angle, Problem #3 doesn't start @ reholdering, it starts at hiring. CGC would have had to hire a fraudster and then given him no oversight at all for several years for #3 to be the problem.

 

Problem #3 is the Swagglehaus version and it means that CGC is a hive of villainy, a place where fraudsters are given the resources and room to grow and flourish...but I honestly don't believe that's the case. But problem #1 represents the real biggest threat to CGC. #1 being the case would be an existential threat that CGC could not survive. Personally I think #2 is the most likely, that this is a just bunch of dudes spiraling about fake data they found on social media websites (ebay included). I just think out of the possibilities of "fake slabs", "fake sales" or "inside man", #3 is the least likely and the most inflammatory allegation against CGC. You're ascribing the company itself has having the intent to defraud and that's just kinda implausible.

So for your #2, your favored theory, tons of faked auctions on eBay. For what purpose? Attention? This sounds like more of a conspiracy than the conspiracy you claim #3 is the inside man. 

Hard to be fake when some are landing in the hands of posters here. 

I'll go with "anything is possible". But your #2 supposition is last in line. Last among all the possibilities, not just these 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2023 at 5:12 PM, agamoto said:

I've looked pretty close at all the 238's and I think you're ok there, but holy hell in a handbasket are you ever in your right to question the legitimacy based on what's going on with the seller you're dealing with. I am VERY surprised CGC hasn't jumped in and reached out to you with an offer to compensate you for those books so they can be the ones to crack them out and verify. 

I think this is something that absolutely needs to happen

:applause: to all the detectives here, completely fascinating watching this all unfold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/27/2023 at 4:15 AM, MatterEaterLad said:

The dates in the grader's notes are hard to explain away.

A Hulk 181 was graded Green on a Friday and then Blue on the following Tuesday. There's no way someone got their book shipped to them, did the switch, and shipped it back for grading in one working day (Monday). There's someone doing this at CGC, then someone else doing the selling.  

And making some huge bank from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
50 50