• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

ASM #252 CGC 9.8 Record Sale - something fishy going on? - Holder Tampering Incident confirmed by CGC
50 50

9,030 posts in this topic

On 12/28/2023 at 11:03 AM, BrashL said:

Good to see them finally respond, and not surprised as Mike's statement was definitely run by some lawyers before he posted. Liability has to be a huge concern right now. As others have stated, a few hundred books may be related to one individual but realistically the number probably can never be known due to the ease at which the slabs can be opened and switched out. I think we have to assume the worst. 

The changes to the case people have suggested are all good and something must be changed, but that still leaves the issue of all the books in older cases which would rightly be devalued against the new ones. I think a reasonable compromise is CGC should offer discounted reholdering for any slab with checks for tampering either in the case itself or in the chain of custody. If issues are found they can compensate the difference (in cash, not CGC bucks!) and if not the book will now have the correct market value. Slowly you'd clean up the supply and do right by customers. It's probably gonna cost them but there's no way around that at this point.

Yeah, this also ran through my mind when news of the scam broke. There are ways of fixing the cases to make them tamper proof, but the thousand or so cases I already own will no longer be as desirable. That is a critical part of this story moving forward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/27/2023 at 9:51 PM, skybolt said:

Starting at 1:30:18 and 1:33:18 in this video, 9.9newsstand provides some very interesting insight on the scammer.

 

So if we believe the video, the guy doing this is a dealer. 

Probably worth exploring if certain dealers get special treatment at CGC. I always assumed big dealers can get books pushed to the front of the grading line. But are they given a pass on regrading? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2023 at 11:10 AM, BrashL said:

I don't think changes to the case of that nature are the answer anyway, it just creates a new arms race and no system is unbreakable, at least not at a cost that makes the business viable. The solution here is pretty simple actually and I hope they implement something similar:

  • Every book gets Grader Notes, every single one (OK maybe not a 10)
  • Every single book gets a high res picture front and back
  • Every note related to the cover or back of the book is annotated in the picture, with the defect circled, marked, whatever

Essentially create a unique fingerprint for every comic, which is essentially what this board has been doing for a week now. Not only do you ensure the integrity of the slab, you ensure the integrity of the grade itself. This would take a little more time, but to be honest this is the bare minimum of what a grader should be doing now considering how much value they are adding (or subtracting) from a book. If they did this, I could care less how easy the case is to open. 

This is most likely the way to go.   Hi resolution scans of both front and back showcasing indicators might be the only viable solution. 

Now, the next step is to improve the wifi and the cellular problems at shows lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2023 at 11:05 AM, Dr. Balls said:

Thermochromic pigment will fade over time when exposed to UV (which, arguably, no one should be doing in the first place), but I don't know if there is a discoloration involved as time goes on. Worth finding out, though - because no one would want that - however, if the pigment was applied to the post inserts and post, there would likely be not much of an issue - as long as the discoloration did not appear to be the same shade as the "tamper" color.

I have stated it before, and it is just my suggestions.  Every inner well has the certification number and possible the book and issue etched or stamped on it. Possibly include an RFID chip on the label as well as inside the inner well to help identify the book. Increase the overall strength of the welding of the case insuring it will break if opening is attempted. Make all reholders subject to regrading. High grade publically availible images of all submitted books, and full records every time CGC handles the book, or makes changes to the label and case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2023 at 9:10 AM, BrashL said:

I don't think changes to the case of that nature are the answer anyway, it just creates a new arms race and no system is unbreakable, at least not at a cost that makes the business viable. The solution here is pretty simple actually and I hope they implement something similar:

  • Every book gets Grader Notes, every single one (OK maybe not a 10)
  • Every single book gets a high res picture front and back
  • Every note related to the cover or back of the book is annotated in the picture, with the defect circled, marked, whatever

Essentially create a unique fingerprint for every comic, which is essentially what this board has been doing for a week now. Not only do you ensure the integrity of the slab, you ensure the integrity of the grade itself. This would take a little more time, but to be honest this is the bare minimum of what a grader should be doing now considering how much value they are adding (or subtracting) from a book. If they did this, I could care less how easy the case is to open. 

I’d also add every book that has been reholdered has a date of when the reholder took place, preferably with images before and after of the reholdered book. Not to demonize all books that have been reholdered, I’ve done it to a chipped slab or two in my PC but at least as a buyer you have as much information as possible and can take whatever risk you’re willing to take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2023 at 10:10 AM, Stefan_W said:

Yeah, this also ran through my mind when news of the scam broke. There are ways of fixing the cases to make them tamper proof, but the thousand or so cases I already own will no longer be as desirable. That is a critical part of this story moving forward. 

And now that they’re going to make “changes” going forward, you’d have to be nuts to submit a book before they are implemented. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2023 at 11:08 AM, drotto said:

I trust the individuals will be prosecuted, but stand by my initial statement.

I do respect your opinion, but what's not being said is there may be other entities involved already working with law enforcement agencies.  If more than one agency is involved, they would like to be aware of each other, etc.

CGC isn't the only victim in all of this and, honestly, there's enough evidence that this should be reported with or without their involvement.  Also, what if an individual victim is following this thread but unwilling to come forth publicly.  They may have already called the police/FBI/ebay/etc.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that comes to mind...

Will any upgrades to tamper proof it, will it become public knowledge?

@Buzzettas does cgc have to let us know? That thought crossed my mind to avoid scammers, but I don't know any legalities 

Edited by ADAMANTIUM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2023 at 11:21 AM, BrashL said:

And now that they’re going to make “changes” going forward, you’d have to be nuts to submit a book before they are implemented. 

Depends on what the changes are. If they find a retrofit solution using the current slabs and inner sleeves they can implement it quickly even as a stop-gap solution. If they do something like encasing the label in the sleeve it would involve a redesign of cases and sleeves followed by the manufacturing time to make the new product. That is not a short process. 

It will definitely be interesting to watch moving forward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2023 at 9:13 AM, drotto said:

I have stated it before, and it is just my suggestions.  Every inner well has the certification number and possible the book and issue etched or stamped on it. Possibly include an RFID chip on the label as well as inside the inner well to help identify the book. Increase the overall strength of the welding of the case insuring it will break if opening is attempted. Make all reholders subject to regrading. High grade publically availible images of all submitted books, and full records every time CGC handles the book, or makes changes to the label and case.

I like the RFID chip scenario - it will obviously increase the price, but that's likely going to happen anyway with whatever new security measures they put forth. If they created something that could be scanned and confirmed quickly (by a buyer) - that would go a long way, and not really be that big of a deal. I look up cert numbers on every slab I buy anyway to look at grader's notes, so one more step wouldn't be a hassle just to confirm what I'm buying.

Sealing the certification in the well is also a possibility, that way in order to switch labels, you'll have to ruin the integrity of the well to do so. It's been awhile since I cracked a case, I don't know if they already do that, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2023 at 10:26 AM, ADAMANTIUM said:

One thing that comes to mind...

Will any upgrades to tamper proof it, will it become public knowledge?

@Buzzettas does cgc have to let us know? That thought crossed my mind to avoid scammers, but I don't know any legalities 

I'm not really sure how they could do it without it becoming apparent to someone, and they'd probably like the public to know what to look for etc, just a thought

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2023 at 10:44 AM, ADAMANTIUM said:

Those awful tamper proof stickers on the sides of the case where it presses together would work.

If a drop happened and chipped a case, the likely hood of case separation wouldn't be all that likely, or not enough to make the tamper proof stickers separate (thumbsu

Sure you wouldn't be able to open the sides to remove newton rings, but one on each side in the middle where the case presses together anyway would work. If the sticker shows ware an automatic regrading needed.

Simple and effective, but idk, just a thought :) 

Ofttimes low tech and analog protections are the most difficult to defeat.

Seems to me CGC or any top Tier grading service needs a dept akin to what the US Secret Service does for the US Treasury and that is; prevent, detect, investigate and go after counterfeiters and rouge insiders.   If CGC does have one of those departments, then frankly they have failed

Edited by MAR1979
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2023 at 11:29 AM, ADAMANTIUM said:
On 12/28/2023 at 11:26 AM, ADAMANTIUM said:

One thing that comes to mind...

Will any upgrades to tamper proof it, will it become public knowledge?

@Buzzettas does cgc have to let us know? That thought crossed my mind to avoid scammers, but I don't know any legalities 

I'm not really sure how they could do it without it becoming apparent to someone, and they'd probably like the public to know what to look for etc, just a thought

I'm not sure how well it would go over if it was "we made changes, but we won't tell you about them". How many people would actually believe changes were made?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2023 at 9:29 AM, MAR1979 said:

Seem to me CGC or any top Tier grading service needs a dept akin to what the US Secret Service does for the US Treasury and that is; prevent, detect, investigate and go after counterfeiters.

The CGC Secret Service. I like it. Honestly, the company is large enough, with so much invested, that's really not that outlandish to suggest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2023 at 10:30 AM, wombat said:

I'm not sure how well it would go over if it was "we made changes, but we won't tell you about them". How many people would actually believe changes were made?

ya and if it was hush hush, they wouldn't be aware of any leaks to that info, I was just double checking :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
50 50