I 100% agree with you. Your analogy should point out how silly CGC's stance really is. BTW, I really like the cracked windshield analogy. Serious question, how do we go about presenting our argument to CGC ? I was impressed, a few years back, when CGC listened to the Boards and changed their stance on tape. I think it took some influence from big customers on tape to get the attention of Paul Litch but it did get done. I can't believe the hobby, in general, wants to see bindery flaws ignored. Of course the submitter likes it but once it gets into the marketplace it's a turd.