• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

500Club

Member
  • Posts

    17,472
  • Joined

Posts posted by 500Club

  1. 18 hours ago, thehumantorch said:

    It's been selling near that price forever, Dave.  I fished two out of your dollar bin and got 8K apiece for them. :gossip:

  2. On 9/5/2020 at 12:38 PM, Bosco685 said:

    Agreed. That first movie was action gold. No matter what the books reflect.

    It's like if folks really reflected on Tony Stark in the comic books is 6'1" tall, yet Robert Downey JR is 5'9" tall. Where the pitchforks then over this height concern?

    For me it wasn’t the height.  5’6” Stallone can be made to look much bigger.

    Reacher is described as a rough hewn man.  NOBODY reading the books pictures facial features like Tom Cruise.

  3. 2 hours ago, littledoom said:
    17 hours ago, comixry said:

    Yup, time to unload those Suicide Squad villains (again). Has it been already four years since the first one?

    Why is there an announcement?

    Companies like to announce these things (SS 2 movie cast) to build excitement, rather than just having them magically appear in a theater near you one Friday. :grin:

  4. 15 hours ago, Crops068 said:

    I like what I see of Virus thus far, I hope he has staying power and is a good villain for Brock.  That said speculation originally was that he was Jack o'Lantern, but that seems too obvious, now people are more for Lee Price.

    Put me down for Phil Urich. 2c

  5. 3 hours ago, bellrules said:

    It was also in a bunch of other titles that month. I saw someone say that those didn't count as a first appearance as it was a preview/pre-print. (I think people are just making up these terms now) To me, those 9 pages of the first issue preview counts as their first appearance.

    The market has turned its back on this line of thinking.  Besides, if you're going to call that a first appearance, why stop there?  The Previews had an earlier appearance.

  6. 6 hours ago, Hollywood1892 said:

    I remember how I stopped collecting around those times...I was 15 so I knew nothing of day trading, stocks, market crashes, inflation, collectibles crashes. I'm 41 and I still no very little about it...

    But I do know this...when something dies as the OP has said, it generally stays dead...so did the comic book industry die until movies started coming out? Or did CGC help resurrect it?

    It didn't 'die', per se.  It just took a huge haircut.  By 1996, the gimmick books, the supply glut, the distributor wars, the cover price increases and the drop in quality of the books had chased many long time collectors away.

    As the decade ended, some collectors crept back, with the rise of eBay, CGC, the movies, and pockets of increased quality.

  7. 18 hours ago, kav said:

    He also just said, when I told him I made a thread:
    "I was big into both markets when that happened. I was there. I give no credence to anyone that disagrees".

    He's right.   From '91-'93, if you went into sports card stores, you started to see stacks of that week's hot new releases showing up on display tables, and sections of the card stores being devoted to comic books.   Things like Valiant, the Batman back breaking issues, the Marvel hologram covers, and the polybagged return of Superman books were everywhere.

  8. 14 minutes ago, Lazyboy said:
    2 hours ago, Corona smith said:

    So it’s a time displaced Tim Drake in a Batman Beyond costume?!

    (shrug)

    But I can't imagine why Bruce would call Batman "Tim" if it was Terry in the suit.

    It’s like the Seinfeld when George bought the car that ‘John’ Voight had owned. :gossip:

    Sometimes I go by Tim... sometimes I go by Terry...’

  9. 13 hours ago, Hey Kids, Comics! said:

    Almost...South Carolina.

     

    From StackExchange:

    To sum up:

    Modal stacking is not sloppy, meaningless, or redundant; linguistically, it is a systematic process (which I think is really cool!). It is just non-standard in English — something one would avoid using outside of this particular dialect group, especially because (like many features of Southern English) it carries a certain stigma outside of where it is used. But within that group, it is a productive and useful construction.

    I asked a sister, a brother, a wife and a husband from SC, and they both agreed.