Shhh. Don't tell everyone!
I’m just trying to be fair, as more accurate grading is always better for both parties.
To balance that, I must admit that a few books in the FVF/VF- range appear very slightly overgraded, but it is hard to tell from scans only.
Andy’s grading is spot on (safely a bit undergraded, like I tend to do), but everyone has its "weak spot" where he undergrades. Mine tends to be in the G+ to VG- range – they are all G/G+ to me…
You are wrong. It won't get poofed. They clearly know one another and are merely conversing about grading books. This is what used to happen all the time before the selling threads became a freak show of kvetching, hand-wringing and teeth clenching. If you look for a ghost behind every tree, you'll find one.
closest thing I could find to a ghost behind a tree
to be fair, if I knew neither I would be hesitant to buy any books in this thread as someone already pointed out he's over grading.
to be fair #2 - i personally rely on my own grading despite what most folks put on along with their scans and these comments would not affect me nor would the others that have been posted
Regardless of threadcrapping, everybody is pointing to this about overgrading. Wasn't it about undergrading, and meant in a positive?
That's how I read it.
It started off saying hey that looks undergraded and then followed it with except I think your others are overgraded. looks like your grading skills are weak in that area. mine are strong in that area compared to yours.