joe_collector

Sure, but the problem is that NO ONE ever does (before being told) so that doesn't seem to work. Maybe we should make a "Comic Porn" sub-group?

More family-oriented fare in the Marketplace.

Not mentioning any names, but are there any board rules on selling comic porn/fetish stuff?

, I bet you think that Nixon, Carter, Reagan and Johnson actually appear in Point Break.

Seriously, how old are you, three? I think your Mommy is calling you for dinner!!

The actual Moon Knight never appears in the issue - it's an apparition/dream sequence caused by the real villain. Pretty clear-cut, especially as other issues with similar fake/dream/etc. non-appearances are noted as such. Do you think that this should be noted as a "Captain America Appearance"?

Okay, I've PM'ed Steve about the label error, but to be fair, that is a very old label and it may be corrected by now. The same thing happened with Iron Man 9, which was incorrectly noted as a "Hulk Appearance", which was subsequently corrected when brought to CGC's attention.

CGC and OS have made tons of mistakes similar to this, but as soon as they are highlighted, are usually quickly corrected. But like I said, it's an error on his 3rd appearance, so there's likely no hurry to correct it.

Does troll mean "say something you disagree with"? And you obviously haven't been around here long, or been subject to any thread hijacking, if you think that's what I'm doing.

Wow, you mean you bought CGC?

On a serious note, have you read the Moon Knight stories from the Hulk magazine and Marvel Preview? I love that stuff, and it's my fave MK material. Oh and BTW, those books have REAL Moon Knight appearances.

WBN 37 is not a Moon Knight appearance.

If he mailed it USPS, I don't believe we have tracking numbers from the US to Canada, if it's UPS, you might want to contact them. This is true, the USPS will not have tracking to Canada, but a UPS package will!!! If you get USPS insurance, there is a registration number that you can enter in to get confirmation of delivery.

Agreed, and it's over for me. Bygones and all that jazz.

But if Arch reinstates it, the squabble will end immediately and I can post endless while Dale fumes.

All that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing. If someone outright lies (as well as changing it multiple times) then of course I'm going say something, and I am asking Arch to reinstate the thread so we all see exactly what transpired. I have nothing to hide, but Dale certainly does.

Come on, even you disagreed with his earlier assertion that I was the lone gunman, and had, in actuality, come late to the party after all the fireworks were gone. Only in his last post did a hint of truth emerge, as he admitted that GA had hit him first (while neglecting to mention r1970d, Pitboss and a ton of others), and now suddenly I'm no big deal and had no effect on him or his thread. So why did he continue to mention me by name, over and over and over? His version seems to change by the minute. First I'm Mr Evil, the reason for his thread being derailed, and the next, it's GA and others who did it, and I'm totally unimportant. Man, it must suck to have Alzheimer's.

Hey, I'm still allowed to hype my posts. And to tell the truth, you're no longer my mortal enemy - greggy is.

Sorry, I'm just not a fan of bizarre revisionist history that even a mortal enemy like banner has stated is untrue. I came in loooooooooooooooooong after the flamewars were over, yet (for obvious reasons) I'm consistently named as the ONLY person who called Jocko on his rule-breaking. I guess he's tres scared to call anyone else out or to admit he called them "stupid rules".

When you state I am the ONLY one to highlight your transgressions, and that you IMMEDIATELY and FULLY ADMITTED YOU WERE WRONG and QUICKLY CLOSED the thread down with NO COMPLAINT WHATSOEVER, I think anyone with a memory level greater than a goldfish knows exactly who is lying here. But I'm sure Arch can bring the thread back if you ask him, just so we're absolutely clear on what happened.

I find it quite hilarious that Jocko here keeps dragging me out as the big bad guy, when SEVERAL PEOPLE helped point out his OBVIOUS RULE-BREAKING, and by the time I came along, they had ALREADY CHASED HIS SORRY HASS off the forums. But instead of highlighting the FACT that he was LAMBASTED by a GROUP of forum members for his transgressions, it's far safer to keep TROLLING and NAMING me alone. I guess that makes it seem safer, portraying me as the lone gunman, rather than the reality of a group effort long before I even saw the thread. And you really changed your tune since Arch totally deleted your thread. Where are the complaints about the "stupid rules" and how you "didn't do anything wrong"?

And jerks always play this "Oh, boo hoo hoo, these bad people telling me about the multiple rules I broke are the reason there aren't more great books on here! Boo hoo hoo!" angle. Just FOLLOW THE RULES and STOP WHINING LIKE A BUNCH OF OLD LADIES.

How? I've seen threads that have gone on for days before a Mod takes action, and a recent one where I got so ticked I hit the "Notify Mods" button, only to be told it had already been done.

Hey, I admit coming in late, and replying to a few posts before reading the 8-10 pages of drivel, but since a) the books, scans and prices were still there and b) the thread was still active, I really had no idea anyone had done some bizarre "soft close".