• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

theCapraAegagrus

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    28,429

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by theCapraAegagrus

  1. theCapraAegagrus
    No.
  2. theCapraAegagrus
    "9.4 range" = somewhere around NM. I tend not to give the opinion of 9.8 unless I can examine it in-hand myself. Would you be happy with "9.8 candidate"?
  3. theCapraAegagrus
    Let's pretend it's a 9.4 blue label. The color touch improves the grade to 9.8, but it's restored.
  4. theCapraAegagrus
    It looks like you're right, though. Iron Man #1 CGC'd is about +50% asking price for Stan Le''s sig. Do they actually sell at that price, though? I've seen these ones listed forever.
  5. theCapraAegagrus
    Well, . On Moderns, I normally add $100/sig. So, Infinity Gauntlet #1 CGC 9.8? All 4 contributors' signed? $500. 50% is ridiculous IMO and it looks like I'll never own a key with Stan's sig if that is a continuing market trend. If you can get a 50% hike, though, more power to ya.
  6. theCapraAegagrus
    ^ Based on the fact that I heard he was charging $150 per signature at some point.
  7. theCapraAegagrus
    Yeah. I also don't have any Stan Lee sigs. Let's pretend that you're beginning at a price that is spot-on FMV per whatever data source. I would probably pay an additional... $200-300 for a good Stan Lee signature on a SA key. I have no idea if that follows any SS trends. That would simply be my personal price range.
  8. theCapraAegagrus
    The most? Yes, the spine is hurting it the most. Giving it a good clean and pressing out the waviness will get it into that 6.0 range IMO.
  9. theCapraAegagrus
    There's no default %. I'm a SS collector. I've probably paid on average 10% more per book, but, I don't have SA keys. They're mostly Bronze/Modern.
  10. theCapraAegagrus
  11. theCapraAegagrus
    You wanna fight bro? The "Marvel didn't catch it" is their share of the blame. That's all speculation, anyways. I don't know which studio chose the "8 Years Later" card. I'm just conveying some meaningless conjecture. The reaction/dialogue by Feige makes it seem to me that Sony put it in there and Marvel overlooked it.
  12. theCapraAegagrus
    That is a character attribute; Not a testament to his limits as an actor. Krasinski is a perfect casting choice regardless of Blunt's inclusion. He's a better fit for Richards than she is for Sue Storm.
  13. theCapraAegagrus
    It's a secret?
  14. theCapraAegagrus
    What even is your username? Every time I see it my dumb ace reads it as, "Name is Grr" in my head.
  15. theCapraAegagrus
  16. theCapraAegagrus
    Murphy's Law.
  17. theCapraAegagrus
    8.5-9.0 IMO.
  18. theCapraAegagrus
    8.5-9.0 IMO.
  19. theCapraAegagrus
    9.0 range.
  20. theCapraAegagrus
    Co-produced. They're both liable for the error.
  21. theCapraAegagrus
    9.0 range.
  22. theCapraAegagrus
    9.0 range.
  23. theCapraAegagrus
    6.5 IMO.
  24. theCapraAegagrus
    7.0 IMO.
  25. theCapraAegagrus
    3.0 IMO.