theCapraAegagrus

Your answers are insufficient.

I hate the bezel screen design and refuse to upgrade from the iPhone 8. Edit: I also don't need 3 f^&*ing cameras on 1 side of the phone.

Anyone else been getting this since the "site maintenance" on Friday?

I concur. And I hate Apple. Their phone is the boss, though.

Yup.

Gotcha. Wanted to make sure you weren't thinking that I meant Stan Lee sigs are above the law... It kind of is. It's part of the reason that I despise any of the custom labels. People have pointed out Spider-Man labels with restoration notes. IMO, non-universal/only-SS comics should be ineligible for those labels.

I would be conscious of prices elsewhere, but I may pay around or very slightly above other venue prices just for the "have it now" factor. Let's say I'm looking to upgrade my Action Comics #684. It's on eBay for $120 all-in. I'd pay $125 at a show just because I don't have to wait for it. If I can haggle it down below eBay, then awesome! If there's no wiggle room; I'll suck it up. I have a fluid budget, though, and everyone's MMV. Some people need to fill their collection with a strict budget, and I have nothing against that. So, personally conscious of other prices, but not afraid to pull the trigger if it's at/above and it fits my budget.

I'm not gonna read 0 comics in January, so, this weekend I'm gonna sit my fat ace down and read all of the stuff I got from the gift exchange last month.

It's the same content, though. A reprint of a first appearances is just that - a reprint of a first appearance. A first print of a first appearance is another thing, dingus!

That's disappointing. I figured that the "artifacts"/props, like Cap's shield, would be. I'm not really looking for an MCU experience.

@Xenosmilus explain your laughter.

Wondering if that edge wear is a manufacturing, or handling, defect.

2.0 IMO.

4.0 IMO.

3.0 IMO.

0.5 IMO.

LQ photo. Comic itself looks vibrant.

Still NG, as far as I can tell.

Because they don't have gold+green Stan Lee labels.

"Immaculate" isn't really an applicable term for comic books. Also, 9.6 and 9.2 are not "low grades", just to be clear. Are there any press-able defects on them? The 9.2 must have a color-breaking crease on it or something to maintain NM- after being pressed (assuming it was actually pressed). And, as I write this, I read the grader notes. Yes, both of these grades seem accurate.

See: My comment on the duplicate thread you posted in the Newbie sub-forum.

I've seen this before and it's usually not good. Did you submit this? If so - call CGC.

People love being divisive. They think it's 'competitive' (it isn't).

Oh.