• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

scburdet

Member
  • Posts

    5,427
  • Joined

Everything posted by scburdet

  1. No basis for a Qualified label on this one. Those are reserved for unverified signatures, damage that is not obvious that doesn't impact the story (cut coupon, MVS, removed Tattooz, etc.), something unusual like a significant production defect (I have one "manufactured without staples") or a book is mostly perfect but has a significant defect that would warrant a lower grade (you rarely see staple detachments with green labels b/c somehow they detached without causing any real damage). The staple detachment here is not like that last case. As long as the tattooz is in the packet, Universal label. If the tattoo is missing, then it probably would get a green 4.0/4.5 to just denote that it was missing.
  2. 6.0/6.5. I think the reader crease is what keeps is a little down
  3. 8.5/9.0. Try to work on the lighting in future posts, the pictures aren't very crisp
  4. 6.0/6.5. Always anticipate a worse grade from CGC than you think when analyzing stains
  5. My eyes went right over the piece missing for some reason. Divide my guess by 2.
  6. >9.0. White covers are always tricky for their ability to obscure defects except grime.
  7. There's a horizontal line across the center of the back cover. Doesn't really look like a scanner thing, but I'd like to know what that is.
  8. FWIW, I would vote against Marvel chipping b/c the edges are otherwise fine. 8.0 tops I think, but lots of upside.
  9. 8.0/8.5, just for the small stress lines