• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Upgrayedd2

Member
  • Posts

    257
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Upgrayedd2

  1. On 8/18/2023 at 2:01 PM, bc said:

    Ran a quick query on CGCDATA.COM for all books that were added to the census in the past week (8/8/23 to 8/15/23)

    http://cgcdata.com/cgc/search/desc/no/label/all/orderby/year/variants/yes/census/230815/censusprior/230808/

    image.thumb.png.3d96255c9f3307935963121073945038.png

    If I'm reading this correctly, CGC slabbed a total of 28,472 books in a week or about 5,700 per day (given a 5 day work week) or about 4,100 for a 7 day work week.

    If it's a normal 8 hour, 5 day a week operation, that is about 12 books per minute or one every 5 seconds.

    -bc

    Ah! This is the data I was looking for.

  2. On 6/12/2023 at 3:30 PM, comicginger1789 said:

    A lot of what I classify as new collectors (guys and gals who have jumped in in the last decade) seem to avoid this place. They view it as archaic and stick to the YouTube’s and Instagrams and Whatnots of the world. Which I this is a disservice to their growth in this hobby because this is the best place to be for a very accurate dose of reality. Sadly a lot of people like Bry have their own view and they don’t like criticism so rather than take it and maybe learn or grow, they delete it

    CG,

    I follow Bry and he consistently acknowledges mistakes (financial and grading), provides a collector and investor perspective, and reminds viewers that these are his opinions.

    With respect to the board's existence, I think he was having some fun on someone's behalf. I've been following him for over 2 years and back in those days, we discussed this board.

  3. On 1/3/2023 at 9:25 AM, andrehanderson said:

    I like CGC, but that's an insult to not include notes on a book that looks pristine yet is graded 9.2. I get it if there is an obvious issue with the book, but when it looks like a NM copy, the whole 9.2-9.4-9.6 thing is so subjective and should be explained in the notes. Makes me want to avoid getting anything graded as I have to trust that someone wasn't just having a bad day.

    An even more valid point with the recent discussion on scammers removing comics and attempting to sell color copies. Grading notes would add another level of assurance.

  4. On 12/13/2022 at 5:19 PM, Upgrayedd2 said:

    https://boards.cgccomics.com/profile/104376-cgc-mike/ @CGC Mike Not sure if I added the link to Mike correctly.

    I just received Thor #127 back from CGC: Grade 7.0. The grader's note indicate (1) Light cover tanning (2) Light creasing to cover (3) Moderate spine stress lines to cover (4) Moderate staining to cover

    Here are the items I found: (5) Pulled staples (6) Ripped back page (7) Stain, indent, and wear on back cover

    Please advise on how to proceed.

    Thor 127 Front Cover.jpg

    Thor 127 Pages Out Front.jpg

    Thor 127 Pages Out.jpg

    Thor 127 Top Staple.jpg

    Thor 127 Bottom Staple.jpg

    Thor 127 Back Cover.jpg

    Thor 127 Back Cover Tear.jpg

    Thor 127 Back Cover Stain Wear.jpg

    Update: @CGC Mike Thank you so much for your assistance. CGC took very good care of me. This matter is resolved.

  5. I own and have come across high graded comics which I would describe as pulled staples. However, when I sent the comics in for grading, they came back without any references to the staples. In one instance, I sent the comics back because I thought they were damaged in transit. The feedback I received was, "the slightly offset staple were printed that way." I was very happy to receive that news. 

    I've attached pictures of a comic (not owned by me) that best captures what I see in some of my slabbed comics. I guess I haven't seen, or avoided, enough comics to determine what is slightly offset due to wear vs printed that way. Now there's a whole new variable added to my calculations.

    The enclosed photos are of a CGC 9.6. Several of the comics from my personal selection vary from 6.0 to 9.4 range. Again, with no mention of staple offset.

     

    Screen Shot 2023-01-27 at 5.35.40 PM.png

    Screen Shot 2023-01-27 at 5.35.24 PM.png

    Screen Shot 2023-01-27 at 5.35.00 PM.png

  6. On 1/3/2023 at 9:25 AM, andrehanderson said:

    I like CGC, but that's an insult to not include notes on a book that looks pristine yet is graded 9.2. I get it if there is an obvious issue with the book, but when it looks like a NM copy, the whole 9.2-9.4-9.6 thing is so subjective and should be explained in the notes. Makes me want to avoid getting anything graded as I have to trust that someone wasn't just having a bad day.

    I agree. However, you'll find several distinct camps on this forum who strongly believe one way to the other.

  7. https://boards.cgccomics.com/profile/104376-cgc-mike/ @CGC Mike Not sure if I added the link to Mike correctly.

    I just received Thor #127 back from CGC: Grade 7.0. The grader's note indicate (1) Light cover tanning (2) Light creasing to cover (3) Moderate spine stress lines to cover (4) Moderate staining to cover

    Here are the items I found: (5) Pulled staples (6) Ripped back page (7) Stain, indent, and wear on back cover

    Please advise on how to proceed.

    Thor 127 Front Cover.jpg

    Thor 127 Pages Out Front.jpg

    Thor 127 Pages Out.jpg

    Thor 127 Top Staple.jpg

    Thor 127 Bottom Staple.jpg

    Thor 127 Back Cover.jpg

    Thor 127 Back Cover Tear.jpg

    Thor 127 Back Cover Stain Wear.jpg