• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Qualified or Crapified?

312 posts in this topic

And I wonder what CGC would grade a book if I just sent in a cover? 893scratchchin-thumb.gif

 

893scratchchin-thumb.gif

 

What if I sent the cover from one book, and insides from another book...... together?

Mark Haspel said during the SD dinner that some books have been submitted like that. I forgot what he said about how it got labelled! tongue.gif

 

you mean they actually "slabbed" them? 893whatthe.gif

Why not? confused-smiley-013.gif

 

Why? confused-smiley-013.gif

They will grade whatever is presented to them. I believe that they will note the book based on the interior with a note that the cover is mismatched. Hell, they told me that some interiors are the combination of 2 different books. I forgot how they dealt with that! confused-smiley-013.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am baffled that you will continue to defend a pile of toilet paper like this. It's missing TEN PAGES! Both of your examples are POOR. One looks nicer than the other, but they're still both POOR because they're missing TEN PAGES.

Which is why it got a qualified grade with full disclosure. Simply grading them both as "poor" seems like it would be providing "less" information. I thought most of you were against that? 893scratchchin-thumb.gif

 

That's a foolish statement. "Poor" is "Poor". As it stands, it wouldn't even say that, it would only say "0.5". To call a "0.5" a "6.0" because the COVER is nice is misleading in the extreme.

 

Give the full disclosure for why it gets a "0.5"... but don't polish that turd and try to tell me that it's better than it actually is because it's "Qualified." Poor is Poor. Deal with it.

 

Just stole this link from another thread. Check out this CGC GEM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to have to 893scratchchin-thumb.gif about this.............................
893scratchchin-thumb.gif hard because it's obvious that you will need to! insane.gif

 

893scratchchin-thumb.gifNope. Not worth responding to..... 893blahblah.gif893blahblah.gif893blahblah.gif

893offtopic1.gif but isn't this POS book your holy grail? MTU 53 CGC 9.6 WP with good QP

 

Yup. Just used the BIN. Got any $$$ you can lend me? confused-smiley-013.gif

Nope...I guess you have to sell some of your sweet DCs to pay for this book! 893frustrated.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

confused-smiley-013.gif where's my Qualified?

Maybe that POS wouldn't be better than a 3.5 if it had the page so they couldn't give you one. goodevil.gif

 

I think that ASM 171 is a definitive PR .5 (sorry Darth)

 

Terrible PQ

Terrible QP

Possible soiling......

 

For god sake's.....they even got the price wrong. tongue.gif

 

That book would be a POS even if that page wasn't missing...... smirk.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Green or Purple Label may be the only way for some people to get a FF 1 or a AF 15.

 

Not everyone who collects comics is a money bags. smirk.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites