-
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
-
Posts
143 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
CGC Journals
Gallery
Events
Store
Posts posted by Shazbot
-
-
- Juno Beach, grendelbo, serling1978 and 1 other
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Looney Tunes 16 clocking in from 1943 as my new most oldest book. The 1st Pussycats will need an upgrade someday for sure. And I can't find Blue Ribbon 3 or Adv of Mighty Mouse 6 on the census at all so that's fun. As for the Australian Duck reprint, tell me flat backgrounds don't just hit better on newspaper stock?
-
- Namtak, ADAMANTIUM and Larryw7
- 3
-
-
Yeah but how much for the gem 1/1 Variant, where you and a friend get to personally take part in the burning of the other 999 books?
There is no bottom I guess.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
- Larryw7, frozentundraguy, grendelbo and 2 others
- 5
-
-
On 8/24/2022 at 2:27 PM, jsilverjanet said:
A lot of times when I goggle info on a particular book (like how to tell 1st prints or stuff like that) usually what comes up is a CGC thread from before
Yeah, this is how I made my way here. I often see these boards as a top search result when I Google. Maybe I'm just too not-connected.
-
-
I would love it. I think any series focused on them would have to exclude mortals pretty much entirely.
Maybe a mini involving all the entities when they were "young". Story line might be a power struggle during the first seconds of the universe's existence. Game of Thrones style. Their "powers" are new, they are inexperienced, their reality is in flux, & next to each other their powers are maybe not all so OP. Would leave room for growth and exploration of characters and the development of the laws of nature in our universe. -
-
Wondering how confident the AC#1, FF#1, AmFan#15, etc owners feel with their big-money CGC grades. Did that "4.0" get an under the table bump from 3.5 or lower? What about that next key they're looking at, think they still want that CGC stamp as much? Trust it nearly as much? I sure wouldn't know. But there's lots of people here on this site who do. If 10.0s are up for grabs, and no fool now thinks they aren't, what other grades can be trusted?
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
On 8/12/2022 at 1:02 PM, CGC Mike said:Given the recent circumstances, we have made adjustments to the labeling originally used for the Ultimate Fallout exhibiting the acetate cover. Going forward, any copies submitted to CGC will display in the label text: "In God We Intrust" Acetate Artist Cover attached with 2 staples after manufacturing. The books will still be allowed to receive a Universal label.
The only thing they think they did wrong, and are willing to correct, is the spelling error.
Just ...wow!! -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
On 8/12/2022 at 1:02 PM, CGC Mike said:We feel it is important to provide transparency on how CGC arrived at our method of certifying Clayton Crain’s Ultimate Fallout comics with the attached acetate covers. For us, this was an unprecedented item to grade. After Mr. Crain spoke with us prior to C2E2, the rules we applied to his books:
- The additional cover had to be created by an established artist in the industry.
- The comic to which the cover was attached had to contain a cover by that same artist.
- A copy of the comic with the attached cover had to be submitted to us for inspection prior to certifying any copies.
Given the recent circumstances, we have made adjustments to the labeling originally used for the Ultimate Fallout exhibiting the acetate cover. Going forward, any copies submitted to CGC will display in the label text: "In God We Intrust" Acetate Artist Cover attached with 2 staples after manufacturing. The books will still be allowed to receive a Universal label.
This will also apply to Mr. Crain’s forthcoming copies of Ghost Rider #1 and Deadpool Nerdy 30 #1 that contain an acetate cover.
This is absolute garbage. As an enthusiast newly retuning to the hobby, I will never, ever submit a book to CGC. I will never again purchase any book with your name attached to it. If I stay at this forum, it's only for the brain trust of forumites.
-
This plot line has gone on for 94 issues now and so far the main antagonist has only made a couple of brief, 4th-wall-breaking cameo appearances to mock us, the readers. This run is cray-cray!! Glad I picked issue #1 off the rack, think I'll add an acetate cover or two, maybe slap some glue on the spines for that square-bound feel, shrink wrap it, and sub through the Triple-Platinum(or 'Black Flag') Tier for that sweet, sweet 10.0.
- DrunkWooky, Beige and troydivision1
- 3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
Bit of a twist on the classic Pump and Dump scam. Hype the umbrella with a hot product then short-sell it all to your inside-trading partners who Jack up the price after the closing bell. In other "markets" such "investors" and those who facilitate these manipulations go to prison.
In this market the only regulators are us. The only way to stop it is to stop paying silly money for manufactured "value". No 32pg comic book should sell off-the-rack for $75. Period.
Frankly tho, LCSs have been doing something like this for forever, they sell all their copies of ASM-361 to speculators and favored regulars before they even put any out on the shelf. Plebs like me go home with a bunch of keys missing from our runs, that 3 months later are way out of our price range(but I'm not bitter about it at all). -
- Larryw7, ADAMANTIUM, djpinkpanther67 and 1 other
- 4
-
Bought this book knowing, based on some of the seller's descriptions, it might not be the March of Comics #9 that I was hoping for. I still have questions.
it was listed as a soft cover children's book & by title only; The Story of the Gloomy Bunny, same as MoC 9. No pictures were provided, and while I'm sure I could have requested some, it was cheap enough to gamble on. Whatever it turned out to be I'd find a place for it.
It arrived today. It's definitely the same story as the MoC. Same story title. Indicia states K.K. As the publisher same as MoC, it's a giveaway like MoC with a children's clothing store advert on the back. The front cover arts are identical, though my background appears to have faded from blue to green-ish.
The indicia however doesn't mention MoC. I've read this is the case for some of the earlier MoC issues, but nothing regarding issue #9 specifically. MoC wouldn't appear on the cover so that's no help. My book's indicia states a copyright of 1946 but not a publication date. Whereas MoC 9 apparently has a pub date of 1947, although I can't actually verify that.
My book has 10 pages of story and art, it's dimensions are 8"x10", printed on what I'm guessing was the same newspaper stock as MoC at the time. Unfortunately, while the art is abundant and very lovely, it's definitely a story book not a comic book.
So my questions, if anyone knows and would be kind enough to answer(and has stuck it through to the end of this diatribe): Was this story definitely published as a comic book at around the same time they published it in such a similar fashion as a story book? Was that unusual at the time? Or did this story book, for some Golden Age weirdness reason, just get mixed into the MoC series in this form?
Anyway, thanks. Here's some pics.
Journals Exist! Go and Have a Look at Them 😎
in Comics General
Posted
Never knew about those, thanks. Unfortunately none of the dropdown links in that Navigation group work for me. The galleries and calendar links work but the dropdowns are dead to my iPhone.☠️