Get Marwood & I

I stopped after 700. Well, Superior actually. Trust me. It got very worse

I agree. I'd have started with "Amazing Fantasy #15 Spider-Man 1-700 / CGC" That would have got everyone's attention and pre-loaded searches going.

Dunnit. Don't forget DeadOne above by the way - he's looking for help with Galleries if you haven't already spotted it

What, again!? Go on then. Don't delete them this time will you.

Seconded!

Indeed. Take this extract from the Den of Geek link posted earlier regarding Aunt May discovering Peter in his Spidey suit at the end: Says Watts, “That was a thing where I don’t remember exactly at what point it came up when we were just brainstorming ideas, but as soon as that came out, it was like, ‘We gotta’ do that. Like we gotta’ do that!’ It’s like when you have an idea that makes everyone excited and nervous, and feels like, ‘Are we seriously going to do that?’ Then you know you have to do it… And it definitely has opened up a huge can of worms, and I have no idea how we’re going to address it.” Is this kind of off the cuff plotting why these films can often feel unsatisfying? Is this really how to plot and -script a good film? "Hey, why don't we have monkeys explode out of Aunt Mays vanity case!" "Yeah! That rocks baby - it's in!" Whizz-bang-wallop film making. They've taken our souls......

I don't believe that has ever been a barrier to you answering a question before Arch when the mood has taken you and besides, there's nothing to stop you making an announcement without responding to my questions directly, as you did with your likes abuse post. Many people have asked for clarification on the new moderation rules since the new boards went live so it strikes me (no pun intended) that you'd want to clarify them at some point regardless of individuals questioning. I did raise the questions in the right place - you said your guy deleted them in error: I'll stop asking now though - 5 times is enough - and will wait with everyone else to see what you come up with in the natural course of your transition work, i.e. setting out new board policy where the old policy no longer applies. Cheers

Hour by hour resolve firmly, like a Roman and a man, to do what comes to hand with correct and natural dignity, and with humanity, independence, and justice. Allow your mind freedom from all other considerations.

This is the kind of chatter we usually see in a Sales thread. The agenda is obvious. It's all good. Whatever. Why are you making derogatory comments towards us? Do we even know you? Why are you making derogatory comments towards Bomber-Bob and Transplant? Do you even know them?

That was my thought too. If the reference to MJ was meant to be a joke, then what was the intended punch line? 'Only joking guys, we know she's awful and couldn't possibly be MJ'. Seems out of place with the overall championing of the underdog theme.

Jim's agenda is to have a laugh with like minded people. You should try it some time Bob.

You seem to take passive aggressiveness quite seriously!

Not at all - it looks like it has great potential to me. Like most new things, it takes a bit of getting used to and perhaps isn't as intuitive as it could be. Don't sweat the broken record thing - that always happens when you try and make things better. Sure Arch will dive in soon. Keep at it

I just had a go at creating one @DeadOne and I can see what you mean. In your Savage Conan section I see you've posted 'unable to edit' at the bottom: I created a similar gallery set up (now deleted) and saw the 'manage image' button thinking that would do the trick: It allowed me to delete content.... ....but I couldn't add a new image. The + button wouldn't put anything I added using 'choose files' into the text. So I get what you're saying. Hopefully there's either something we're both missing, or it's a solveable system glitch Good luck - your test area looks great by the way

I know. What a cheat.

Now you're just being Talkative? Martin.

I refer the Honourable Gentleman to the reply I gave earlier Sorry for being the class dunce today!

I see, thanks Philip. A quick googleation helped my understanding along. I get it now. Never heard that term in all my years...

I'm confused by this thread. We seem to be debating whether Brian Hitch's photo-referenced art is a good (Michelangelo) thing or a bad (photo-tracer) thing. If so, and looking at the thread title, which one of 'threat' and 'menace' represents the good thing? What am I missing?

Cheers Scott, keep it up For me, I'd want the minimum profile data showing on mobile screen posts given the size constraints. If users want to see the additional data, they can select the full profile. On desktop PCs, you have much more room to display additional profile data under the avatar - usually, we have a large dark grey block of nothing under it so any additional data helps break that up.

Are collected editions cheating? I picked two old hags up at my local charity shop last week Must've been my lucky day, as I then picked up these two books as well:

You are not alone....

Good idea! If he doesn't know you could always tell him to ask G.A.tor

This is intriguing. To help your case along, could you post some examples of the two ends of the quality spectrum as you see them? A thread about art should have pictures, no?