• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

theCapraAegagrus

Member
  • Posts

    28,427
  • Joined

Posts posted by theCapraAegagrus

  1. On 7/26/2023 at 2:39 PM, Dr. Balls said:

    I would definitely agree - but boy, trying to get them to see or admit that their fringe ideals don’t translate into big budget movies - that’s where the butthurt comes in.

    Sure, there are indy stuff and art house films, and those a valid and great vehicles for expression. I’ll accept any story own it’s own merit and I don’t fault anyone for making a story they feel is important - when it’s an expression of their own creation, or an adaptation - creatively, I respect that. The fault comes when you try to uninterestingly shoehorn a previous idea with a “twist” into society, expecting it to be the next Star Wars and then screaming “racist!” Or “bigot!” When the box office numbers aren’t what you expected.

    I got my friend to watch MoS and BvS, trying to get him into some of the stuff I like. He hasn't continued. I stopped 'bothering' him about it after a few weeks. He's more into anime than live-action. The studios should take this approach with repeated ideas.

  2. On 7/26/2023 at 2:23 PM, Dr. Balls said:

    I just dislike the concept of reworking “classic” stories. Make a new story. If these ideals mean that much to you or they are so incredibly valid - they should, theoretically, stand on their own without the crutch of using an established franchise.

    We know that they're not, which is why we know their intentions when they do this stuff, and it's so transparent that most people see through it and reject it.

    We get it. We just don't get why they keep trying when it keeps failing. That will be a significant footnote in cinematic history.

  3. On 7/26/2023 at 9:02 AM, media_junkie said:

    That didn't work out to well for them with the remake of "The Little Mermaid".  Budget of $250million + $100 Million marketing for an all in of $350 million (that we know of).  Little Mermaid had a WW gross of $560 million, so split that in half, Disney received $280 million back, still $70 million short of break even.

    As perceptively pointed out earlier in the thread... There isn't much of a "target audience" for these projects.

  4. What Disney did with the original stories was adapt them; Closely enough that they maintained the narrative that the original story intended but with a happy ending. The 'remakes' have little in common, conveying a sense of laziness and alienating those who wished to see a true live-action adaptation of a story that maintained a relative closeness with the source material.

    This all echoes my previous post.