theCapraAegagrus

Full disclosure: I'm 100% an amateur at grading.

Did you see the 2nd trailer (~5 mins)? That one tipped the scales in the "must-see" direction for me. It looks well-directed from a visual standpoint. Something Zack Snyder brought to the films that cannot be ignored. Comic books are strictly optical and he brought panels to life on the big screen. Idk if I've ever seen a James Wan film before, but his style looks very good from the Aquaman trailers. It's nice to see some content of Vulko from the final trailer. He was supposed to debut in Justice League (among other supporting characters for the new team members...) and I was sorely disappointed in his absence from the Theatrical Cut (again, same for those other supporting characters). Idk if I'll see this at the 7 PM pre-release, but I'll be seeing it a couple of times during opening weekend for sure.

I would say: 2.5

Received my recognition PM. Officially in.

"Not my diagnosis."

I'd go with Copy B. Better face appeal. Roughly the same grade.

IMO: 3.0

IMO: 3.5

IMO: 2.0

IMO: 8.5

IMO: 8.5

Some died, some are as mediocre as they've ever been, and others have been under ownership newer than mine for a long time. I coded and was an Admin for forums between the ages of 13 and 20. It's been close to a decade since then.

Simple math: You stir %^&*, and you've been a registered user for over a decade. 2 + 2 = 4. I also read these forums for a couple years before joining last year (not an uncommon practice).

Love Religulous, but he's a dingus.

This accusation is based on... 1 topic? A nonsensical topic posted by a drive-by n00b that will never post here again? Okay. I tend to support people based on their merits and not their seniority (see: Creed in The Office). It's disappointing to see that you choose otherwise. And, for the record, Jerkfro has been (based on your definition) a constant %^&*-stirrer for over a decade longer than I have. Let that sink in...

If you buy books that you love, then at least you'll enjoy owning it if you can't sell/resell it. It's a hobby above all.

Says the n00b/troll that joined 4 days ago...

If you've read my posts, then you'd know that I don't believe in anything. Your posts obviously indicate that you don't read posts thoroughly.

Don't make me administrate a forum in you.

I want to contribute to the raffle, and backup Santa, but it's just too hectic a season right now. Next year I'll be more prepared to take part in everything.

Seems like you're arguing just to argue. Who are you to decide that it's not up to me..? I've administrated hundreds of websites and forums in my days. I know how message boards work. It seems to me like you don't. We don't need you popping into threads acting like our parents when you certainly aren't. You don't know how to communicate or discipline, apparently. Your posts are bleeding irony.

Thanks for the mention, @HollyJollyOne. PM'd.

To make it clear, I'm going to request a name change to Arbiter of Meaningful Content, since that hasn't been understood yet.

I do. And obviously you do, too, since you're here. I'm not the cause of any issues here. We don't need 50 Stan Lee topics, just like we don't need 50 eBay topics.