• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

scburdet

Member
  • Posts

    5,420
  • Joined

Everything posted by scburdet

  1. Looks like about a 7.0/7.5 minus the detachment (corner crease, a few bends, soiling), but I don't think that would be high enough to convince a CGC grader to give it a qualified grade. Around 3 is the standard for a detached cover.
  2. Can you post the full front & back photos? I believe if the book is significantly higher grade ignoring the detachment, you can get a qualified grade.
  3. I'll be a little more optimistic & say a c/p gets this to 9.0, but I would only invest 8.0 as-is in an offer price
  4. Front: some spine stress lines, something color breaking about the marvel comics bar, outer corners a little rounded. Back: around the smiley face & gift wrapping on the other side is what look like some ink transfer or something. Hard to say from photos. Outside the shadow, it looks like a color breaking line through the BR corner of the business reply card 7.0/7.5
  5. Exactly my thoughts before I scrolled down to the replies. If it was the spine or the little piece, I would say 7.0/7.5, but combined, maxing out at FN. Still sharp
  6. about 1/2 dozen World of Warcraft books around the 9ish. Good for a WoW lover, not great candidates for CGC grading at the cost/book. Probably good candidates for your frequent suggestion of Mylar toploaders
  7. Thanks. I re-checked too. There was a sold issue 8 on ebay within the last few months. I saw it earlier and then forgot. It has a Punisher story, which now I will have to find of that part of my collection https://www.ebay.com/itm/255951903117
  8. Basically jives with all I've found. MCS mentions a lot of Byrne story & art in early CPL issues, but not Layton art. Obviously, it was his publication so there could be something in 1-8, but I haven't even seen so much as a blog post with someone showing images of those issue. They must have been around at some point if MCS has them listed. I can't imagine making the inventory entry if there was never anything to sell Felt pretty fortunate that there was even a copy this nice out in the wild for sale. There are others, but a lot look—to be charitable—pretty crappy.
  9. Please check out the thread guidelines. 1 book/post w/front & back photos and 3 books/day limit. I don't know WoW comics, but my brief research suggests getting a lot of these graded will be a large expense with little chance of adding value. If these were in pristine condition with a shot of getting a bunch of 9.8s—maybe. From what I can see generally, you are likely to be paying more per book to grade than their FMV.
  10. around 7.0, unless the corner is a production issue. I too doubt that hypothesis. Classic looks better than the grade IMO
  11. I agree. I was expecting a lot less in terms of content. I love learning about old, often forgotten, stuff like this
  12. I am not familiar with the CBCS process other than knowing they do sig verification. The downside to slabbing this one is that the unverified signature will be inside. A green label where you can see the signature allows a buyer to do their own amateur verification. Taking anything on faith with collectables is dicey. Beyond that, you just have to assess based on sales/personal preference whether the investment in signature is worthwhile. Sign/grade is going to be more expensive unless you have a standard tier book, where it will be about the same cost, or a higher tier book where it could be cheaper. A lot of collectors thumb their noses at signed blue chip books, other collectors love them. There's no real rule here other than what you want personally.
  13. no. Not unless it was near perfect, which this isn't
  14. 👈 Huge Man-Thing fan 7.5/8.0 just b/c of the creasing along the outer edge Revise down to 6.0 tops b/c I missed the crease at the BRFC. Kind of blends into the yellow if you're being lazy about scanning the book
  15. From my new/old hobby of picking up benchmark creators from before they had mainstream success. I'm sure there must be something that pre-dates this, but it's the earliest published pro/amateur art by Bob Layton (cover inks).that I can find. Perhaps more notable for an unpublished Ditko Blue Beetle story
  16. You would get a yellow label for CC, and a thin green qualified strip above. Looks around a 9.0/9.2 otherwise
  17. The one short color-breaking crease on the BRFC probably set the bar 8.5±0.5
  18. 7.5/8.0 I can see enough stress lines that break color & ink loss (scuffing?) to expect something just under VF+ or NM
  19. Maybe I'm seeing things that aren't there, but I see some stuff especially around Nightcrawler's head. 7.5/8.0
  20. 6.0 on this one too. It's cliché, but this book/series was one that got me into collecting & hunting back issues
  21. 6.0. The wide shot of the cover looks higher grade.
  22. Possible bindery tears on both corners? slight miswrap, a little bottom edge wear along the front left and the BRFC looks slightly rounded. 9.2±0.2 Yellow covers are pretyy good at hiding stuff, so give it a good going over before you send it to CGC.
  23. I can't quite tell if the paper is fully intact on the BLFC. If pressed and that's not a large tear, around 6.0