PROBATION DISCUSSIONS 21 21

[jaybuck43]

And I agree with you on that. Given the fact that he can come back, let him earn back his privilege rather than just getting it back at 18 for "time served". Besides he can still be a part of the boards, the HoS only serves as a warning.

[vader2001]

I gave up trying to lead any movement. I just spoke my piece and took a step back.

 

I agree with what bababooey said that there should be some consideration given to the fact that he's a kid. I did a lot of stupid things when I was a 12 years old that I'm glad aren't held against me now that I'm an adult. He knows he wasn't supposed to be here due to the age requirement which would lead to the obvious need to lie about his age. Making up the elaborate stories (believe me, I have some great ones) is but whatever. I chalk it up to him being concerned about being caught so he made up a story. In most of his stories he told to me, the role of "hero" was always play by his young son.

 

I DO think the father monitored his emails so he wasn't getting in trouble as far as creepy guys. I don't think the father takes the comic book industry seriously and is just happy his son is involved in something positive. The father admitted that he didn't know about CGC vs. PGX and had no idea about "grading comics". His son taught him that stuff. By taught, I'm guessing it's the same amount of "humoring the person" my wife gives me when I try to explain how excited I am about buying a certain book. I don't even think the father understands what the CGC Boards really are. He could (and this is all speculation) just look at it as another site like eBay devoted to buying and selling comics. I could be completely wrong and it wouldn't be the first or last time I was.

 

I DON'T think it was an elaborate plot to commit fraud against the CGC Boards. I think he was a 12 year old boy trying to make money to buy comics or Legos or whatever he was buying. I have no explanation for him trying to sell the same books he just poopooed at a higher grade/price. I PM'ed him explaining that I hope he learns to deal with people honestly in the future and uses this as a huge learning experience. I made it clear that what he did was wrong, but I have no doubt that he actually loved comics. He bought some Daredevil Essentials off of me because he really looked forward to reading about the character. I don't see a lot of potential in profit on some old DD Essentials books. He didn't read the PM's though before being banned though.

So, that is my argument for voting "no". As stated, I am well aware I'm in the minority in that opinion and sometimes that how things are. That's why this place is great and a community. People can have different views on things, but the majority vote rules. If you want to attack me or bababooey for having an unpopular view, have at it.

 

 

 

Dude you lost any or all credibility you had with me when you said Legos, therefore your opinion is null and void at this time! Please step away from your computer. Disassemble it and take it to the correct disposal facility and throw it in! Do not look back, just walk away.....

[mikenyc]

I don't like anonymous polls anymore. I want to know who the two people are that voted "no," and why they voted that way.

 

 

 

 

-slym

 

I voted no because it's much more interesting that way.

[Jimmy Linguini]

If I voted I would have voted no because at this point HOS is beating a dead horse.

 

The kid is banned.

[HarveySwick]

I gave up trying to lead any movement. I just spoke my piece and took a step back.

 

I agree with what bababooey said that there should be some consideration given to the fact that he's a kid. I did a lot of stupid things when I was a 12 years old that I'm glad aren't held against me now that I'm an adult. He knows he wasn't supposed to be here due to the age requirement which would lead to the obvious need to lie about his age. Making up the elaborate stories (believe me, I have some great ones) is but whatever. I chalk it up to him being concerned about being caught so he made up a story. In most of his stories he told to me, the role of "hero" was always play by his young son.

 

I DO think the father monitored his emails so he wasn't getting in trouble as far as creepy guys. I don't think the father takes the comic book industry seriously and is just happy his son is involved in something positive. The father admitted that he didn't know about CGC vs. PGX and had no idea about "grading comics". His son taught him that stuff. By taught, I'm guessing it's the same amount of "humoring the person" my wife gives me when I try to explain how excited I am about buying a certain book. I don't even think the father understands what the CGC Boards really are. He could (and this is all speculation) just look at it as another site like eBay devoted to buying and selling comics. I could be completely wrong and it wouldn't be the first or last time I was.

 

I DON'T think it was an elaborate plot to commit fraud against the CGC Boards. I think he was a 12 year old boy trying to make money to buy comics or Legos or whatever he was buying. I have no explanation for him trying to sell the same books he just poopooed at a higher grade/price. I PM'ed him explaining that I hope he learns to deal with people honestly in the future and uses this as a huge learning experience. I made it clear that what he did was wrong, but I have no doubt that he actually loved comics. He bought some Daredevil Essentials off of me because he really looked forward to reading about the character. I don't see a lot of potential in profit on some old DD Essentials books. He didn't read the PM's though before being banned though.

So, that is my argument for voting "no". As stated, I am well aware I'm in the minority in that opinion and sometimes that how things are. That's why this place is great and a community. People can have different views on things, but the majority vote rules. If you want to attack me or bababooey for having an unpopular view, have at it.

 

 

Dude you lost any or all credibility you had with me when you said Legos, therefore your opinion is null and void at this time! Please step away from your computer. Disassemble it and take it to the correct disposal facility and throw it in! Do not look back, just walk away.....

The only reason I chose to specifically name Legos as an example of what he might be buying with the money was due to the fact that he apparently was trying to barter with Buzzeta for some Legos. I don't think most 12 year olds play with Legos, but apparently he does.

[vader2001]

I gave up trying to lead any movement. I just spoke my piece and took a step back.

 

I agree with what bababooey said that there should be some consideration given to the fact that he's a kid. I did a lot of stupid things when I was a 12 years old that I'm glad aren't held against me now that I'm an adult. He knows he wasn't supposed to be here due to the age requirement which would lead to the obvious need to lie about his age. Making up the elaborate stories (believe me, I have some great ones) is but whatever. I chalk it up to him being concerned about being caught so he made up a story. In most of his stories he told to me, the role of "hero" was always play by his young son.

 

I DO think the father monitored his emails so he wasn't getting in trouble as far as creepy guys. I don't think the father takes the comic book industry seriously and is just happy his son is involved in something positive. The father admitted that he didn't know about CGC vs. PGX and had no idea about "grading comics". His son taught him that stuff. By taught, I'm guessing it's the same amount of "humoring the person" my wife gives me when I try to explain how excited I am about buying a certain book. I don't even think the father understands what the CGC Boards really are. He could (and this is all speculation) just look at it as another site like eBay devoted to buying and selling comics. I could be completely wrong and it wouldn't be the first or last time I was.

 

I DON'T think it was an elaborate plot to commit fraud against the CGC Boards. I think he was a 12 year old boy trying to make money to buy comics or Legos or whatever he was buying. I have no explanation for him trying to sell the same books he just poopooed at a higher grade/price. I PM'ed him explaining that I hope he learns to deal with people honestly in the future and uses this as a huge learning experience. I made it clear that what he did was wrong, but I have no doubt that he actually loved comics. He bought some Daredevil Essentials off of me because he really looked forward to reading about the character. I don't see a lot of potential in profit on some old DD Essentials books. He didn't read the PM's though before being banned though.

So, that is my argument for voting "no". As stated, I am well aware I'm in the minority in that opinion and sometimes that how things are. That's why this place is great and a community. People can have different views on things, but the majority vote rules. If you want to attack me or bababooey for having an unpopular view, have at it.

 

 

Dude you lost any or all credibility you had with me when you said Legos, therefore your opinion is null and void at this time! Please step away from your computer. Disassemble it and take it to the correct disposal facility and throw it in! Do not look back, just walk away.....

The only reason I chose to specifically name Legos as an example of what he might be buying with the money was due to the fact that he apparently was trying to barter with Buzzeta for some Legos. I don't think most 12 year olds play with Legos, but apparently he does.

 

But dude it's not Legos, it is Lego..... Lego is plural, I got what you where saying, just that you used it incorrect.....

 

[HarveySwick]

 

Really?! It's not "Legos"?!

 

You learn something everyday!

 

http://www.brothers-brick.com/lego-glossary/

 

https://community.lego.com/t5/LEGO-General/The-plural-of-LEGO-is-not-LEGOs/td-p/7769242

Edited February 13, 2014 by HarveySwick

[jaybuck43]

Jimmy, just curious, your aware that the banning is only because he's under 18 and presumably when he turns 18 he can come back. Think of it like a 6 year strike rather than a ban. Now do you still feel its beating a dead horse?

[mikenyc]

Jimmy, just curious, your aware that the banning is only because he's under 18 and presumably when he turns 18 he can come back. Think of it like a 6 year strike rather than a ban. Now do you still feel its beating a dead horse?

 

Yes.

 

If he twirls his mustache for the next six years waiting to return and request partial refunds on his transactions, then let's roll the dice and see what happens.

[Bio-Rupp]

Jimmy, just curious, your aware that the banning is only because he's under 18 and presumably when he turns 18 he can come back. Think of it like a 6 year strike rather than a ban. Now do you still feel its beating a dead horse?

 

Yes.

 

If he twirls his mustache for the next six years waiting to return and request partial refunds on his transactions, then let's roll the dice and see what happens.

 

Got to hand it to mikenyc... he had the kid pegged from the start and saw right through him.

[paperheart]

I gave up trying to lead any movement. I just spoke my piece and took a step back.

 

I agree with what bababooey said that there should be some consideration given to the fact that he's a kid. I did a lot of stupid things when I was a 12 years old that I'm glad aren't held against me now that I'm an adult. He knows he wasn't supposed to be here due to the age requirement which would lead to the obvious need to lie about his age. Making up the elaborate stories (believe me, I have some great ones) is but whatever. I chalk it up to him being concerned about being caught so he made up a story. In most of his stories he told to me, the role of "hero" was always play by his young son.

 

I DO think the father monitored his emails so he wasn't getting in trouble as far as creepy guys. I don't think the father takes the comic book industry seriously and is just happy his son is involved in something positive. The father admitted that he didn't know about CGC vs. PGX and had no idea about "grading comics". His son taught him that stuff. By taught, I'm guessing it's the same amount of "humoring the person" my wife gives me when I try to explain how excited I am about buying a certain book. I don't even think the father understands what the CGC Boards really are. He could (and this is all speculation) just look at it as another site like eBay devoted to buying and selling comics. I could be completely wrong and it wouldn't be the first or last time I was.

 

I DON'T think it was an elaborate plot to commit fraud against the CGC Boards. I think he was a 12 year old boy trying to make money to buy comics or Legos or whatever he was buying. I have no explanation for him trying to sell the same books he just poopooed at a higher grade/price. I PM'ed him explaining that I hope he learns to deal with people honestly in the future and uses this as a huge learning experience. I made it clear that what he did was wrong, but I have no doubt that he actually loved comics. He bought some Daredevil Essentials off of me because he really looked forward to reading about the character. I don't see a lot of potential in profit on some old DD Essentials books. He didn't read the PM's though before being banned though.

So, that is my argument for voting "no". As stated, I am well aware I'm in the minority in that opinion and sometimes that how things are. That's why this place is great and a community. People can have different views on things, but the majority vote rules. If you want to attack me or bababooey for having an unpopular view, have at it.

 

Apparently Matt Murdock is not the only blind lawyer (where is the baiting thingie?)

Edited February 13, 2014 by paperheart

[Jimmy Linguini]

Jimmy, just curious, your aware that the banning is only because he's under 18 and presumably when he turns 18 he can come back. Think of it like a 6 year strike rather than a ban. Now do you still feel its beating a dead horse?

 

In six years you think he'll come back and the ban will be revoked?

 

I'm under the impression the ban will stick.

[HarveySwick]

I gave up trying to lead any movement. I just spoke my piece and took a step back.

 

I agree with what bababooey said that there should be some consideration given to the fact that he's a kid. I did a lot of stupid things when I was a 12 years old that I'm glad aren't held against me now that I'm an adult. He knows he wasn't supposed to be here due to the age requirement which would lead to the obvious need to lie about his age. Making up the elaborate stories (believe me, I have some great ones) is but whatever. I chalk it up to him being concerned about being caught so he made up a story. In most of his stories he told to me, the role of "hero" was always play by his young son.

 

I DO think the father monitored his emails so he wasn't getting in trouble as far as creepy guys. I don't think the father takes the comic book industry seriously and is just happy his son is involved in something positive. The father admitted that he didn't know about CGC vs. PGX and had no idea about "grading comics". His son taught him that stuff. By taught, I'm guessing it's the same amount of "humoring the person" my wife gives me when I try to explain how excited I am about buying a certain book. I don't even think the father understands what the CGC Boards really are. He could (and this is all speculation) just look at it as another site like eBay devoted to buying and selling comics. I could be completely wrong and it wouldn't be the first or last time I was.

 

I DON'T think it was an elaborate plot to commit fraud against the CGC Boards. I think he was a 12 year old boy trying to make money to buy comics or Legos or whatever he was buying. I have no explanation for him trying to sell the same books he just poopooed at a higher grade/price. I PM'ed him explaining that I hope he learns to deal with people honestly in the future and uses this as a huge learning experience. I made it clear that what he did was wrong, but I have no doubt that he actually loved comics. He bought some Daredevil Essentials off of me because he really looked forward to reading about the character. I don't see a lot of potential in profit on some old DD Essentials books. He didn't read the PM's though before being banned though.

So, that is my argument for voting "no". As stated, I am well aware I'm in the minority in that opinion and sometimes that how things are. That's why this place is great and a community. People can have different views on things, but the majority vote rules. If you want to attack me or bababooey for having an unpopular view, have at it.

 

 

Apparently Matt Murdock is not the only blind lawyer (where is the baiting thingie?)

[THE_BEYONDER]

Jimmy, just curious, your aware that the banning is only because he's under 18 and presumably when he turns 18 he can come back. Think of it like a 6 year strike rather than a ban. Now do you still feel its beating a dead horse?

 

In six years you think he'll come back and the ban will be revoked?

 

I'm under the impression the ban will stick.

 

His ban is for being underage

[MetalPSI]

I gave up trying to lead any movement. I just spoke my piece and took a step back.

 

I agree with what bababooey said that there should be some consideration given to the fact that he's a kid. I did a lot of stupid things when I was a 12 years old that I'm glad aren't held against me now that I'm an adult. He knows he wasn't supposed to be here due to the age requirement which would lead to the obvious need to lie about his age. Making up the elaborate stories (believe me, I have some great ones) is but whatever. I chalk it up to him being concerned about being caught so he made up a story. In most of his stories he told to me, the role of "hero" was always play by his young son.

 

I DO think the father monitored his emails so he wasn't getting in trouble as far as creepy guys. I don't think the father takes the comic book industry seriously and is just happy his son is involved in something positive. The father admitted that he didn't know about CGC vs. PGX and had no idea about "grading comics". His son taught him that stuff. By taught, I'm guessing it's the same amount of "humoring the person" my wife gives me when I try to explain how excited I am about buying a certain book. I don't even think the father understands what the CGC Boards really are. He could (and this is all speculation) just look at it as another site like eBay devoted to buying and selling comics. I could be completely wrong and it wouldn't be the first or last time I was.

 

I DON'T think it was an elaborate plot to commit fraud against the CGC Boards. I think he was a 12 year old boy trying to make money to buy comics or Legos or whatever he was buying. I have no explanation for him trying to sell the same books he just poopooed at a higher grade/price. I PM'ed him explaining that I hope he learns to deal with people honestly in the future and uses this as a huge learning experience. I made it clear that what he did was wrong, but I have no doubt that he actually loved comics. He bought some Daredevil Essentials off of me because he really looked forward to reading about the character. I don't see a lot of potential in profit on some old DD Essentials books. He didn't read the PM's though before being banned though.

So, that is my argument for voting "no". As stated, I am well aware I'm in the minority in that opinion and sometimes that how things are. That's why this place is great and a community. People can have different views on things, but the majority vote rules. If you want to attack me or bababooey for having an unpopular view, have at it.

 

 

Everyone can come to their own conclusion, that's true.

 

Given the lengths he lied to people in PMs I, personally, have some real long term concerns regarding whether or not anyone here would choose to allow someone who has demonstrated such abilities from sharing this space with us in commerce.

 

I guess it's that dealing here is a privilege and not a right. It should be hard to gain and easy to lose if for nothing else but to preserve it for the people for whom this type of deception is a foreign concept.

 

I don't begrudge you your willingness to forgive and to not see this as a forum wide deception. Some have just seen this type of thing before and can't get to where you are, especially without any remorse from the perpetrator whatsoever.

And I can appreciate and accept that there are people who have seen this type of behavior before - I have only been here a year. I guess my point is - he's banned. That was a forgone conclusion as soon as all of this was discovered. It was something that should have and needed to happen. He's gone. If he comes back in 6 years as an adult, should he be held accountable for his actions as a 12 year old? I guess I can't get over his age factored into this.

 

I'm also just looking at the HOS in general. It's been in existence for 8 years. In 2 weeks, I'm assuming there will be two new members. That'll make 8 out of 20 that have been added over the last year or so. Has there been that many new HOS worthy members over the last year compared to previous years? Or are people more apt to run and nominate for HOS now? Maybe I just hold the HOS to a much higher standard reserved for the worst of the worst. To me it's like nominating Rick Ankiel to the baseball HOF because he had one great year. This could all just be and on my part. I guess I'm just concerned about a "watering down" effect of the HOS when there are 50 people on it in a few years. I think the HOS is for MAJOR crooks or scammers that affected a wide majority of the Boards and have no possibility of changing their ways. I just see a 12 year old boy and hope maybe being banned for 6 years and time to reflect on how he impacted everyone here will teach him a lesson.

 

Ive been here since the end of October and seen his type of behavior before. In fact, I see it all to much. IN fact I see it everywhere and it disgusts me.

 

 

Take the blinders off

[A.Romeo]

I gave up trying to lead any movement. I just spoke my piece and took a step back.

 

I agree with what bababooey said that there should be some consideration given to the fact that he's a kid. I did a lot of stupid things when I was a 12 years old that I'm glad aren't held against me now that I'm an adult. He knows he wasn't supposed to be here due to the age requirement which would lead to the obvious need to lie about his age. Making up the elaborate stories (believe me, I have some great ones) is but whatever. I chalk it up to him being concerned about being caught so he made up a story. In most of his stories he told to me, the role of "hero" was always play by his young son.

 

I DO think the father monitored his emails so he wasn't getting in trouble as far as creepy guys. I don't think the father takes the comic book industry seriously and is just happy his son is involved in something positive. The father admitted that he didn't know about CGC vs. PGX and had no idea about "grading comics". His son taught him that stuff. By taught, I'm guessing it's the same amount of "humoring the person" my wife gives me when I try to explain how excited I am about buying a certain book. I don't even think the father understands what the CGC Boards really are. He could (and this is all speculation) just look at it as another site like eBay devoted to buying and selling comics. I could be completely wrong and it wouldn't be the first or last time I was.

 

I DON'T think it was an elaborate plot to commit fraud against the CGC Boards. I think he was a 12 year old boy trying to make money to buy comics or Legos or whatever he was buying. I have no explanation for him trying to sell the same books he just poopooed at a higher grade/price. I PM'ed him explaining that I hope he learns to deal with people honestly in the future and uses this as a huge learning experience. I made it clear that what he did was wrong, but I have no doubt that he actually loved comics. He bought some Daredevil Essentials off of me because he really looked forward to reading about the character. I don't see a lot of potential in profit on some old DD Essentials books. He didn't read the PM's though before being banned though.

So, that is my argument for voting "no". As stated, I am well aware I'm in the minority in that opinion and sometimes that how things are. That's why this place is great and a community. People can have different views on things, but the majority vote rules. If you want to attack me or bababooey for having an unpopular view, have at it.

 

 

Everyone can come to their own conclusion, that's true.

 

Given the lengths he lied to people in PMs I, personally, have some real long term concerns regarding whether or not anyone here would choose to allow someone who has demonstrated such abilities from sharing this space with us in commerce.

 

I guess it's that dealing here is a privilege and not a right. It should be hard to gain and easy to lose if for nothing else but to preserve it for the people for whom this type of deception is a foreign concept.

 

I don't begrudge you your willingness to forgive and to not see this as a forum wide deception. Some have just seen this type of thing before and can't get to where you are, especially without any remorse from the perpetrator whatsoever.

And I can appreciate and accept that there are people who have seen this type of behavior before - I have only been here a year. I guess my point is - he's banned. That was a forgone conclusion as soon as all of this was discovered. It was something that should have and needed to happen. He's gone. If he comes back in 6 years as an adult, should he be held accountable for his actions as a 12 year old? I guess I can't get over his age factored into this.

 

I'm also just looking at the HOS in general. It's been in existence for 8 years. In 2 weeks, I'm assuming there will be two new members. That'll make 8 out of 20 that have been added over the last year or so. Has there been that many new HOS worthy members over the last year compared to previous years? Or are people more apt to run and nominate for HOS now? Maybe I just hold the HOS to a much higher standard reserved for the worst of the worst. To me it's like nominating Rick Ankiel to the baseball HOF because he had one great year. This could all just be and on my part. I guess I'm just concerned about a "watering down" effect of the HOS when there are 50 people on it in a few years. I think the HOS is for MAJOR crooks or scammers that affected a wide majority of the Boards and have no possibility of changing their ways. I just see a 12 year old boy and hope maybe being banned for 6 years and time to reflect on how he impacted everyone here will teach him a lesson.

 

Ive been here since the end of October and seen his type of behavior before. In fact, I see it all to much. IN fact I see it everywhere and it disgusts me.

 

 

Take the blinders off

 

yea enough of the "i believe everyone is good" act ...

[vader2001]

 

Really?! It's not "Legos"?!

 

You learn something everyday!

 

http://www.brothers-brick.com/lego-glossary/

 

https://community.lego.com/t5/LEGO-General/The-plural-of-LEGO-is-not-LEGOs/td-p/7769242

 

Dude you must now vote yes!

[skypinkblu]

Jimmy, just curious, your aware that the banning is only because he's under 18 and presumably when he turns 18 he can come back. Think of it like a 6 year strike rather than a ban. Now do you still feel its beating a dead horse?

 

I don't think there has ever been an incident of someone BEING banned at 12 before.

 

I voted for the HOS, because I see it as a joint HOS vote and mine is for the father, not the child.

 

When I first heard about what was going on and read the father's posts I was pretty sure he didn't realize what was going on, but as the days passed it was the father's statement that he was monitoring everything that changed my mind.

 

I still believe it was the kid posting, but I'm more and more willing to believe that he was guided and encouraged. Even though he's obviously an extremely bright child, he's only a child.

 

I have some really odd pms from a kid who was pretending to be an adult. The one sentence that really sticks in my mind is this one.

 

"I hold a couple things dear in my life, my reputation is one of them. "

 

I think it's sad that a child would say something like that and have no idea what it means because obviously his parent has taught him the wrong thing.

 

So, if GIJoe the child, reaches the age of 18, and can show he's really learned the difference, I'd be willing to explore making some kind of exception for the HOS listt...but I think the father is old enough now (assuming he's the 40 yr old) and deserves the HOS forever.

 

 

I actually think he deserves to stand in the corner for the next 6 years...(the father)...but that's another story.

 

 

My guess is I guess we won't have to worry about it in 6 years. There will be some other site where a 12 year old can post and be encouraged by his parent to pretend he's an adult.

 

 

 

[Hado]

I gave up trying to lead any movement. I just spoke my piece and took a step back.

 

I agree with what bababooey said that there should be some consideration given to the fact that he's a kid. I did a lot of stupid things when I was a 12 years old that I'm glad aren't held against me now that I'm an adult. He knows he wasn't supposed to be here due to the age requirement which would lead to the obvious need to lie about his age. Making up the elaborate stories (believe me, I have some great ones) is but whatever. I chalk it up to him being concerned about being caught so he made up a story. In most of his stories he told to me, the role of "hero" was always play by his young son.

 

I DO think the father monitored his emails so he wasn't getting in trouble as far as creepy guys. I don't think the father takes the comic book industry seriously and is just happy his son is involved in something positive. The father admitted that he didn't know about CGC vs. PGX and had no idea about "grading comics". His son taught him that stuff. By taught, I'm guessing it's the same amount of "humoring the person" my wife gives me when I try to explain how excited I am about buying a certain book. I don't even think the father understands what the CGC Boards really are. He could (and this is all speculation) just look at it as another site like eBay devoted to buying and selling comics. I could be completely wrong and it wouldn't be the first or last time I was.

 

I DON'T think it was an elaborate plot to commit fraud against the CGC Boards. I think he was a 12 year old boy trying to make money to buy comics or Legos or whatever he was buying. I have no explanation for him trying to sell the same books he just poopooed at a higher grade/price. I PM'ed him explaining that I hope he learns to deal with people honestly in the future and uses this as a huge learning experience. I made it clear that what he did was wrong, but I have no doubt that he actually loved comics. He bought some Daredevil Essentials off of me because he really looked forward to reading about the character. I don't see a lot of potential in profit on some old DD Essentials books. He didn't read the PM's though before being banned though.

So, that is my argument for voting "no". As stated, I am well aware I'm in the minority in that opinion and sometimes that how things are. That's why this place is great and a community. People can have different views on things, but the majority vote rules. If you want to attack me or bababooey for having an unpopular view, have at it.

 

 

Dude you lost any or all credibility you had with me when you said Legos, therefore your opinion is null and void at this time! Please step away from your computer. Disassemble it and take it to the correct disposal facility and throw it in! Do not look back, just walk away.....

The only reason I chose to specifically name Legos as an example of what he might be buying with the money was due to the fact that he apparently was trying to barter with Buzzeta for some Legos. I don't think most 12 year olds play with Legos, but apparently he does.

The PM I received from GIJOEISAFAAAFFHKKKKKLLL!!!!! was to send me a link for a Spider-woman Lego (Lego's?) figure.

[MetalPSI]

Is there a button to hump for humping buttons?

 

Seriously. Call a spade a spade already.