PROBATION DISCUSSIONS 21 21

[hhwolfman]

I can not debate logic with someone that is illogical. HHWolfman 2015.

 

[Jimmy Linguini]

"b) The Hall Of Shame is for serious transgressions. For example, selling a book/books and sending nothing of value in the package. Interfering with someone's business. Being a multiple offender. "

 

This definition isn't definitive enough for me. Plus, when has someone been put on the HOS for interferring with someone's business? Fo-real? Fo-Rizzle?

 

 

[jsilverjanet]

Im Almost catching up to your post count

[Awax]

Im Almost catching up to your post count

 

I'm not even a TOTAL NEWBIE yet

[Hado]

Maybe not you but certainly everyone else believea that Hustrucks offenses aren't substantial to warrant HOS

 

 

Povertyrov

Hado

bragnet

skypinkblu

Crassus

columbiacomics

Jimmylinguini

 

They all felt HusTruck should not be added based on the Hulk 181 incident because not enough proof was presented

 

Let's see the PMs get presented and we can revisit at that time.

 

I'm only questioning why one nomination had push back and why the other one didn't

Is this an official 'List'?

 

 

[Jimmy Linguini]

Post counts only represent your unlikelihood of being voted into HOS

[awakeintheashes]

Im Almost catching up to your post count

 

I'm not even a TOTAL NEWBIE yet

Ditch the blow and go to the Gold Club. You'll rack up more posts that way.

[PovertyRow]

" How do you know with such assurance what their logic is if they never voiced it?" Because they just voiced it in that poll. Good grief.

 

So logic can be voiced in a poll? I retract my lawyer comment. I think you are a psychic. You seem to know the minds of 100+ people, that majority of which have not uttered a peep beyond the poll.

[hhwolfman]

Maybe not you but certainly everyone else believea that Hustrucks offenses aren't substantial to warrant HOS

 

 

Povertyrov

Hado

bragnet

skypinkblu

Crassus

columbiacomics

Jimmylinguini

 

They all felt HusTruck should not be added based on the Hulk 181 incident because not enough proof was presented

 

Let's see the PMs get presented and we can revisit at that time.

 

I'm only questioning why one nomination had push back and why the other one didn't

Is this an official 'List'?

 

 

Now Now there are 13 more out of 150 votes that believe that he does not warrant HOS. We must be fair.

[jsilverjanet]

A

Maybe not you but certainly everyone else believea that Hustrucks offenses aren't substantial to warrant HOS

 

 

Povertyrov

Hado

bragnet

skypinkblu

Crassus

columbiacomics

Jimmylinguini

 

They all felt HusTruck should not be added based on the Hulk 181 incident because not enough proof was presented

 

Let's see the PMs get presented and we can revisit at that time.

 

I'm only questioning why one nomination had push back and why the other one didn't

Is this an official 'List'?

 

 

is it?

It's people who have spoken out against adding him to the HOS, am I incorrect?

[Jimmy Linguini]

Post counts only represent your unlikelihood of being voted into HOS

 

great observation Jimmy. You're smarter than you look.

[jsilverjanet]

Post counts only represent your unlikelihood of being voted into HOS

 

great observation Jimmy. You're smarter than you look.

 

Quoting your own posts doesn't count as two posts. I tried that earlier but it didn't work

[Jimmy Linguini]

Post counts only represent your unlikelihood of being voted into HOS

 

great observation Jimmy. You're smarter than you look.

 

Quoting your own posts doesn't count as two posts. I tried that earlier but it didn't work

 

It doesnt?

[Jimmy Linguini]

Post counts only represent your unlikelihood of being voted into HOS

 

great observation Jimmy. You're smarter than you look.

 

Quoting your own posts doesn't count as two posts. I tried that earlier but it didn't work

 

It doesnt?

 

It does

[Jimmy Linguini]

Post counts only represent your unlikelihood of being voted into HOS

 

great observation Jimmy. You're smarter than you look.

 

Quoting your own posts doesn't count as two posts. I tried that earlier but it didn't work

 

It doesnt?

 

It does

 

Post-Inception

[hhwolfman]

" How do you know with such assurance what their logic is if they never voiced it?" Because they just voiced it in that poll. Good grief.

 

So logic can be voiced in a poll? I retract my lawyer comment. I think you are a psychic. You seem to know the minds of 100+ people, that majority of which have not uttered a peep beyond the poll.

 

They voted, out of what they have read, of his many dealings by many board members, to put him on HOS. All which have seem to have problems. It is just logical.Yes Logic can be voiced in a poll. Just not explained. I am sure if you asked each one that polled. They would have the same logic.

[awakeintheashes]

Now Now there are 13 more out of 150 votes that believe that he does not warrant HOS. We must be fair.

Is it possible that some may not want to advocate for PL or HOS when their own selling or lazy shipping practices run afoul of what they are advocating for? :shrug:

[awakeintheashes]

Post counts only represent your unlikelihood of being voted into HOS

 

great observation Jimmy. You're smarter than you look.

 

Quoting your own posts doesn't count as two posts. I tried that earlier but it didn't work

 

It doesnt?

 

It does

 

Post-Inception

[PovertyRow]

Maybe not you but certainly everyone else believea that Hustrucks offenses aren't substantial to warrant HOS

 

 

Povertyrov

Hado

bragnet

skypinkblu

Crassus

columbiacomics

Jimmylinguini

 

They all felt HusTruck should not be added based on the Hulk 181 incident because not enough proof was presented

 

Let's see the PMs get presented and we can revisit at that time.

 

I'm only questioning why one nomination had push back and why the other one didn't

Is this an official 'List'?

 

 

Now you see, I never said he was not warranted for the HOS. What I DID say was the majority of "accusations" were either not proven or had no relevance to the PL/HOS.

 

What I would like to see is a straight ahead poll with substantiated facts for an HOS nomination. I'd do it myself but would like to see more than using a fake photo of a cracked slab to get out of a deal for HOS. So I would depend on people who have substantiated evidence to make this. Hell, get together in PM if you have to and share info and dig up some evidence for HOS worthy shenanigans and I'll be right there.

 

But I am very fearful of seeing personality dislikes etc. used as a basis for a valid HOS addition. That sets a scary precedent.

[Jimmy Linguini]

Maybe not you but certainly everyone else believea that Hustrucks offenses aren't substantial to warrant HOS

 

 

Povertyrov

Hado

bragnet

skypinkblu

Crassus

columbiacomics

Jimmylinguini

 

They all felt HusTruck should not be added based on the Hulk 181 incident because not enough proof was presented

 

Let's see the PMs get presented and we can revisit at that time.

 

I'm only questioning why one nomination had push back and why the other one didn't

Is this an official 'List'?

 

 

Now Now there are 13 more out of 150 votes that believe that he does not warrant HOS. We must be fair.

Is it possible that some may not want to advocate for PL or HOS when their own selling or lazy shipping practices run afoul of what they are advocating for? :shrug:

 

Don't put me on a list and start questioning my selling habits.

 

I didn't vote because Rob Ford wasn't on the ballet and saying that kind of stuff in the above quoted post is just flagrant Spoon.

 

Yes I spoon my own spoon.

Edited January 11, 2015 by Jimmy Linguini