• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

WB's SHAZAM 2 starring Zackary Levi (4/1/22)
1 1

696 posts in this topic

On 3/1/2023 at 9:08 AM, theCapraAegagrus said:

Since they already announced that they're rebooting, I say there's no chance that this makes enough to be a part of the new DCU. Which isn't even new... Because there's remains of the old DCEU...

Sadly, I agree it likely won’t make enough.     However I hope to see a new version of Shazam in the DCU.   Gunn sensibility would be perfect for the Shazam Universe with its talking Tiger, worm mastermind, and uncle Dudley. 
 

 

 

Edited by eastriver400
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2023 at 9:46 AM, eastriver400 said:

Sadly, I agree it likely won’t make enough.     However I hope to see a new version of Shazam in the DCU.   Gunn sensibility would be perfect for the Shazam Universe with its talking Tigers, worm masterminds, and uncle Dudley.

Gunn would probably be a good fit for Shazam, yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2023 at 8:11 AM, 1Cool said:

I do agree the budgets for movies will have to be trimmed quite a bit since the box office numbers for 99% of movies just doesn't allow for $250 million budgets. But if Cocaine Bear can make good money without any really stars then maybe every movie doesn't need one person making 30 - 40 million to act in it.  100 million is a LOT of money if you are not paying a few actors 20 million and instead invest in great scripts and unknown but talented actors.

I don't think salaries were a huge part of Shazam's $100 million budget. The special effects, the sets, the zillions of people working on a movie like that are just incredibly expensive. Joker had no special effects, Phoenix made $4.5 million, I assume De Niro made a bit less, the rest of the movie cost $50-55 million, and the rest of the cast likely got paid peanuts. A union production winds up having a lot of required costs.  And these movies usually do not do well without some known talent, so that's probably a non-starter. According to this the Shazam salaries are not that crazy: https://www.showbizgalore.com/shazam-fury-of-the-gods-starcast-and-their-salary/  Also, Cocaine Bear has grossed $30 million. It cost $30 million to make. While it is going to turn a profit, it hasn't done it yet. And it has Kerri Russel in it! (As well as Ray Liota RIP). Kerri Russel is at least as big a name as Zach Levi was.

 

 

Edited by the blob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2023 at 12:36 PM, the blob said:

I don't think salaries were a huge part of Shazam's $100 million budget. The special effects, the sets, the zillions of people working on a movie like that are just incredibly expensive. Joker had no special effects, Phoenix made $4.5 million, I assume De Niro made a bit less, the rest of the movie cost $50-55 million, and the rest of the cast likely got paid peanuts. A union production winds up having a lot of required costs.  And these movies usually do not do well without some known talent, so that's probably a non-starter. According to this the Shazam salaries are not that crazy: https://www.showbizgalore.com/shazam-fury-of-the-gods-starcast-and-their-salary/

 

I agree and that is why Shazam is seen as a successful movie (like you posted earlier).  If they would have tried to get a big name actor who commanded big money the movie would have been a bust.  I hope Hollywood is starting to see it doesn't need big name people to make great movies - -script is way more important than having Brad Pitt in a movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2023 at 12:42 PM, 1Cool said:

I agree and that is why Shazam is seen as a successful movie (like you posted earlier).  If they would have tried to get a big name actor who commanded big money the movie would have been a bust.  I hope Hollywood is starting to see it doesn't need big name people to make great movies - --script is way more important than having Brad Pitt in a movie.

Outside of ScarJo the Marvel movies did not have such big names (and was she even that big then?). RDJ was a faded star. Paul Rudd? Hemsworth became a star as Thor. Cumbersnatch? Higgilsten? Ruffalo was an indie film guy. Captain america? I can't even remember his name. They became stars and got expensive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2023 at 1:02 PM, the blob said:

Outside of ScarJo the Marvel movies did not have such big names (and was she even that big then?). RDJ was a faded star. Paul Rudd? Hemsworth became a star as Thor. Cumbersnatch? Higgilsten? Ruffalo was an indie film guy. Captain america? I can't even remember his name. They became stars and got expensive. 

One of the best thing Marvel did was lock those guys into a salary for the entire run of movies.  Now that they are requiring a salary bump we will see how imaginative Marvel is at developing the next batch of future stars.  I wonder how long it will take for RDJ to be back asking for a few million per movie after the Iron Man gravy train is done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2023 at 1:53 PM, the blob said:

He was a B lister is my point. Generic pretty boy.

 

B-lister - maybe, but he had a solid dozen movies under his belt before Captain America dropped and several of these were serious (non-teen, non comic book) parts.

He had two solid dramatic supporting roles drop in 2007-2008 alone - in Sunshine (when I first realized he could act) and in Street Kings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2023 at 2:40 PM, Gatsby77 said:

B-lister - maybe, but he had a solid dozen movies under his belt before Captain America dropped and several of these were serious (non-teen, non comic book) parts.

He had two solid dramatic supporting roles drop in 2007-2008 alone - in Sunshine (when I first realized he could act) and in Street Kings. 

He was paid $300K for Captain America 1. He got the big paychecks later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2023 at 3:54 PM, the blob said:

He was paid $300K for Captain America 1. He got the big paychecks later.

Yeah - but he wasn't a non-entity.

It's sort of like arguing Ryan Reynolds wasn't a star until he played Deadpool.

Which is true...

If you ignore:

  • Green Lantern
  • Safe House
  • Buried
  • The Proposal
  • Van Wilder
  • Definitely, Maybe
  • Just Friends
  • Waiting
  • The Amityville Horror
  • Blade Trinity

etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2023 at 4:41 PM, Gatsby77 said:

Yeah - but he wasn't a non-entity.

It's sort of like arguing Ryan Reynolds wasn't a star until he played Deadpool.

Which is true...

If you ignore:

  • Green Lantern
  • Safe House
  • Buried
  • The Proposal
  • Van Wilder
  • Definitely, Maybe
  • Just Friends
  • Waiting
  • The Amityville Horror
  • Blade Trinity

etc.

This all began with 1cool talking about paying big stars $20-30 million blowing up the budgets on these movies and why can't we make $40 million movies. These movies wind up costing $100 million + even when they pay the star $300K because of the special effects. Joker cost $60 million or whatever because it didn't really have any. If Chris Evans was only paid $300K he was not a big star, just one of a zillion pretty boys you've seen in stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2023 at 5:08 PM, the blob said:

This all began with 1cool talking about paying big stars $20-30 million blowing up the budgets on these movies and why can't we make $40 million movies. These movies wind up costing $100 million + even when they pay the star $300K because of the special effects. Joker cost $60 million or whatever because it didn't really have any. If Chris Evans was only paid $300K he was not a big star, just one of a zillion pretty boys you've seen in stuff.

Sure.

But like it or not - Chris Evans is now a bonafide action star - as are Gal Gadot, Robert Downey, Jr., Chris Hemsworth, etc.

Both Evans and Gadot were paid at least $15 million each for their last non-superhero action films (The Gray Man and Red Notice, respectively).

Which means they're effectively now priced out of the very ensemble superhero team films that made them A-list stars in the first place.

So we comics fans can't have it both ways.

Either we make do with newer, lesser-known characters from the last 25 years -- or we let both the MCU and DCEU recast the A-list characters - again with younger unknowns.

Realistically, there's no third choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2023 at 5:39 PM, Gatsby77 said:

Sure.

But like it or not - Chris Evans is now a bonafide action star - as are Gal Gadot, Robert Downey, Jr., Chris Hemsworth, etc.

Both Evans and Gadot were paid at least $15 million each for their last non-superhero action films (The Gray Man and Red Notice, respectively).

Which means they're effectively now priced out of the very ensemble superhero team films that made them A-list stars in the first place.

So we comics fans can't have it both ways.

Either we make do with newer, lesser-known characters from the last 25 years -- or we let both the MCU and DCEU recast the A-list characters - again with younger unknowns.

Realistically, there's no third choice.

They're only priced out of the movies that don't do that well. If Thor Love and Thunder can make $761 million then a lot of movies can. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
1 1