Worst Stan Lee signature placement? 0

[serling1978]

Saw this on IG and I really hope Stan went rogue and the person getting the sig didn't ask for him to OBLITERATE THE BLACK CAT'S FACE. 

I'm sure there are many other examples like this, but this has to make the top 10 of the worst. 

[JazzMan]

There's plenty of bad ones..

[JazzMan]

Let's not forget this monstrosity... good signature placement, bad attempt at a spider.

[seanfingh]

9 minutes ago, JazzMan said:

Let's not forget this monstrosity... good signature placement, bad attempt at a spider.

Much love for the Spider-Roach!!!

[chrisco37]

Spider-Roach is 100x better than the 194 or the AF15.  

Just dreadful stuff.   I would expect (hope?) that the sig actually affects the value in a negative manner on either of those books.  Totally ruins them.  

[Ken Aldred]

There’s also the instance of a poorly located sig on a Batman 1 reprint.

Not obscuring any important details, as seen above, but, wrong company, wrong comic book.

[Iconic1s]

Anybody remember when he signed this car for a San Diego Blood Bank raffle/fund raiser during the 2008 SDCC?

[Venomous72]

1 hour ago, JazzMan said:

There's plenty of bad ones..

This is upsetting. 

[Chaos_in_Canada]

[Namtak]

That one is a piece of art until you see the back lol,dont know who own it but he is somewhat Lucky except back cover

[Cliff R.]

1 hour ago, Venomous72 said:

This is upsetting. 

Nauseating. 

Stan should have signed the splash page, below the artwork. 

[Math Teacher]

5 hours ago, serling1978 said:

Saw this on IG and I really hope Stan went rogue and the person getting the sig didn't ask for him to OBLITERATE THE BLACK CAT'S FACE. 

I'm sure there are many other examples like this, but this has to make the top 10 of the worst. 

Yes, that is a poor signature placement. But why, oh why, would you get Stan Lee to sign a book that he had absolutely nothing to do with?

[Mercury Man]

1 hour ago, Chaos_in_Canada said:

To be fair, that Strange Tales doesn't offer a lot of good space to put a signature in the first place.  I guess on the Hydra goon?

[serling1978]

4 hours ago, JazzMan said:

There's plenty of bad ones..

This has to take the top spot as worst ever. Considering the significance of the book and how it's now a total eye sore. Completely ruined. 

 

[Bludriver]

I am not a fan of signatures on a comic book cover, (I would never own one), especially if it is a high grade silver age book. Of the ones posted so far, the AF #15 bothers me the most. What a travesty.

[Domo Arigato]

4 hours ago, JazzMan said:

There's plenty of bad ones..

When that book was signed (defaced?).......a blue label 6.0 was going for about $35k - $45k.

A blue label 6.0 sold last month for $96,000.

Who knows what that yellow label fugly turd is worth.

[Mr bla bla]

12 hours ago, JazzMan said:

There's plenty of bad ones..

WTF is this ...?

atrocity ! A guy with a little artistic sense / creative sensibility would NEVER deface an AF15 like this.

[THE_BEYONDER]

16 hours ago, JazzMan said:

Let's not forget this monstrosity... good signature placement, bad attempt at a spider.

I love this book 

[Ken Aldred]

You have to remember that Stan’s spider-cockroach is only a rough sketch.  If the owner of the book had gone to a top-class inker at the convention, such as having the super-smooth embellishment of Tom Palmer’s style applied, then the end result would’ve been so impressive that even the most critical naysayer would’ve been stunned silent.

[BlowUpTheMoon]

Stan loved signing on faces.